You might want to post your dmesg (e.g. /var/run/dmesg.boot)
OpenBSD 4.3, released today, has many enhancements directly applicable
to the Net5501.
We have 4.3 running on a rackmount model from KD85, and subjectively
it "feels" much faster than my personal Net5501, not yet upgraded.
Kevin
Thank you !
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:00:55 -0600
Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> - OpenBSD 4.3 RELEASED
> -
>
> May 1, 2008.
>
> We are pleased to announce
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:22:20AM +1000, Rich Healey wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >
> > May 1, 2008.
> >
> > We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 4.3.
[...]
> [snip]
>
> Ok, so to clarify, I was run
thanks
Congratulations!!! OpenBSD 4.3 is great
Diego Fernando Nieto Moreno
---
IEEE Student Branch
IEEE Computer Society Branch Chapter Member
http://www.ieee.org/security
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 08:56:57PM -0400, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to connect a Netgear FVS114 to my OpenBSD 4.2 machine. I seem to
> be stuck getting the following three error lines when I use isakmpd -K -d
>
> 205022.882116 Default attribute_unacceptable: AUTHENTICATIO
Thanks Theo and all for another release.
You'll have to find a volunteer to make the ftp servers support OpenSTP for
next release ;-)
--
Mark Mathias
Hi, I have just compiled and tested the program and I hopefully can say,
its really working. I never expected such interest by solving this
problem so I started loosing the hope.
Thanks to the patch of Cesare Gargano, now I can run mrxvt using ksh
and then kill X with Ctrl+Alt+Backspace without l
Rich Healey wrote:
...
> I've been finding it a bit slow, but nice enough, bnut with the release
> "realeased" as it were, I should now rebuild the kernel/userland to
> incorporate the changes?
>
> Sorry if this is in the FAQ somewhere, I've been unable to find it.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5
Well, it should work if your snapshot is pre-4.3. The FAQ says that
upgrades should work if your current release is minus one from the
release you are upgrading to.
>
> Ok, so to clarify, I was running a snapshot on my macppc machine.
>
> I've been finding it a bit slow, but nice enough, bnut wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> May 1, 2008.
>
> We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 4.3.
> This is our 23nd release on CD-ROM (and 24rd via FTP). We remain
> pr
I thought 'noauto' only was for ignoring the volume upon reboot. What I
want to accomplish is to delete a current volume, e.g. sd2 below.
But I tested anyway, and this is the, perhaps not too surprisingly, result:
# bioctl -i softraid0
Volume Status Size Device
softraid0 0 Online
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Marti Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is that I hear!? The FTP floodgates opening for 4.3?
It should be their wallets and paypal accounts, not FTP.
aaron.glenn
May 1, 2008.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 4.3.
This is our 23nd release on CD-ROM (and 24rd via FTP). We remain
proud of OpenBSD's record of more than ten years with only two remote
holes in the
What is that I hear!? The FTP floodgates opening for 4.3?
As always, good work, devs...and I have a brand new V210 to play with
as well...life is good
--
Systems Programmer, Principal
Electrical & Computer Engineering
The University of Arizona
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to install OpenBSD on an Acer Aspire 5920G laptop -- everything
including X works quite nicely. During the installation, I get a DHCP address
for the built-in Broadcom NIC (BCM5787M) so the NIC does work during the
installation process.
When the system comes up though, I no longer h
Thanks! man, this is really annoying, first I thought the -hold 0x00
option solved my problem but was because I moved to bash, indeed I wrote
a mail telling how idiot I am xD . Returning to ksh the
Ctrl+Alt+Backspace problem persist as usual. I will try your fix.
Thanks a lot for your time
-Jes
OpenBSD 4.3-current (GENERIC) #847: Tue Apr 29 01:46:34 MDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5750 @ 2.00GHz ("GenuineIntel"
686-class) 2 GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,AC
Hi All,
I am wondering what could be the performances on this board. At the
moment I see that our board is the bottleneck in our network.
On the board we have running something like 1.5K routes and some pf
rules (no effect with them on/off).
The strange thing is that I noticed that when bgpd is
Now this idea: I don't have an issue with.
For HoneyPot systems, obviously, you want to "Attract attention", you setup
attractive, known buggy user agent strings and the like for other services.
Then watch who attempts.
For Silent Lurker systems, you want an obscure response to thinks like the
HT
On 30/04/08 00:38 +0200, Jesus Sanchez wrote:
> Solved! Oh my god, I'm so dumb and idiot, the option -hold was not
> helping me
> because I was using it in the wrong way, I used "-hold 0" and "-hold
> false" and
> I did not relized what the good option was "-hold 0x00" for the byte order.
>
> Ma
On 2008-04-30, HDC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Part of my dmesg:
Please send *all* of the dmesg, not just part of it.
Hi all,
OpenBSD 4.3-current (GENERIC) #0: Wed Mar 19 04:21:24 CET 2008
As anyone else, I use dump(8) for my backups.
Now I experience this: I made a full dump a while ago with
dump -0 -a -u -f /backup/dump.var.www /var/www
Since then, /var/www got much smaller (you wouldn't believe the
I have the same problem. The device dont transfer any packet,
but de link is up.
Part of my dmesg:
mskc0 at pci11 dev 0 function 0 "Marvell Yukon 88E8040" rev 0x12,
Yukon-2 FE+ (0x0): irq 11
msk0 at mskc0 port A: address 00:1d:09:47:96:8b
ukphy at msk0 phy 0: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, r
Sure but you forget to mention the MTBU. Currently SSD is lower than
SATA drives.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 01:15:56PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > > > I have been reading around the archives a bit and found a few
> > > > references to using 4.3 to get the full performance out of a
> > > > Transcen
Thanks all for suggestions.
I have got finally what I want.
I have created base ramdisk about 4Megs,
then I'm fetching all other daemont/tools into the
mfs disk ang run them. This solution works for now.
30.04.08, 01:58, "Daniel Ouellet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I guess what people try to
Hi
I have the "Intel PRO/1000 PT Quad Port Bypass Server Adapter" and I don't
know how to get the bypass mode working under OpenBSD. Thers is almost no
documentation from Intel and the only reference Ive seen to changing the
bypass mode is a line that said it must be changed programatticall
Le Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:36:48 +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a icrit :
> any info on why http://www.opencvs.org/ is down, and how active is
> this project?
> thx
>
http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20080228093414
--
- Nicolas.
any info on why http://www.opencvs.org/ is down, and how active is
this project?
thx
> > > I have been reading around the archives a bit and found a few
> > > references to using 4.3 to get the full performance out of a
> > > Transcend SSD but my results are showing that the drive is slower
> > > on all fronts.
> >
> > Do you mean, slower with 4.3 than previous versions, or slower
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:36:59AM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> >From which release is Drupal in ports? I can not find it
> in OpenBSD 4.1. I know it is time to upgrade but my
> installation runs sooo nicely now.
4.3, excellent time to update.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Parvinder Bhasin
> I am completely stumped on this , how can I graph pf states etc with
> symon and symux? I do see my regular pf graph but how do i create
> graphs for pf states etc?
Here's the changes
Jonathan Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually it only seems to be used in a handful of asus boards.
> There is a FreeBSD driver that is at least partially working but
> no developers seem to have the hardware so we can't even try
> to port it.
I have the hardware, but the problem is that Op
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:39 PM, aromes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Just couple of questions please:
>
> -Do you know a multi-booter software (doesn't matter if it's commercial)
> that will
> let me multiboot easily Windows XP, Free BSD, Open BSD and Linux from
> partitions that ar
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Lars NoodC)n wrote:
> On OpenBSD 4.2, ssh-keyscan looks like it tries for SSH1 first, rather
> than SSH2, which is the default[1] for OpenBSD. However, it appears not
> to retry the scan with SSH2 if SSH1 fails.
ssh-keyscan never rolls over to a different protocol unless you
On OpenBSD 4.2, ssh-keyscan looks like it tries for SSH1 first, rather
than SSH2, which is the default[1] for OpenBSD. However, it appears not
to retry the scan with SSH2 if SSH1 fails.
$ ssh-keyscan -v 127.0.0.1
debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.7 pat OpenSSH*
debug1: 127.0.0.1 doesn't support ssh1
Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, vous pouvez le visualiser en
suivant ce lien.
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Retrouvez toutes nos nouveautis :
Laissez-vous guider par notre silection de mai et n'hisitez pas ` faire
appel ` un professionnel du cadeau d'affaire pour vous
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 07:47:08PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:10:41PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 05:15:43PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > I am currently running a web site which says http://joomla.*
> > >
> > > Strangely enough, it's a drup
acpi/ is being populated so I' reworked an old patch I made and
I post again it ported from NetBSD
all these key events are catched (alas no events for volume keys):
BrightnessDownPressed
BrightnessDownReleased
BrightnessUpPressed
BrightnessUpReleased
DisplaySwitchP
38 matches
Mail list logo
