How to break the httpd's 4G file size limit?

2009-03-10 Thread John Wong
I want to set up the web server to share file, but i know apache-1.3.x (which is openbsd default httpd) had the 4G file size limit, can i break this limit? Thank you.

Quick question about an PF user's guide example

2009-03-10 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues
Hi everyone, I'm trying to build a PF / ALTQ ruleset that handles traffic between 3 internal interfaces and 1 external, so that the internal interfaces can have different priorities on the available bandwidth they can get from the external interface. I don't know if that's possible with only ALTQ

gem0 on Sun V120 goes dead in a few minutes with "gem0: device timeout" error on bsd 4.5, but works without issue on bsd.mp 4.5.

2009-03-10 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Hi, With the 4.5 kernel on Sun V120, the Ethernet interface will go dead after a few minutes. May be 5 to 15 minutes. No consistence yet that I can see. When this happened, all access to the server is gone and no ping reply as well. The only way is to log via the console and simply do: ifcon

mouse cursor is gone after running xorgconfig with nv driver

2009-03-10 Thread microlaser
Hi, I am running openbsd 4.4 on an amd64 with the "nv" driver, with an nvidia gforce 6200. I used xorgconfig to reconfigure x and now the mouse cursor is gone. anyone have any idea how to get it back? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mouse-cursor-is-gone-after-runn

Re: Can someone please suggest a replacement for xterm for me?

2009-03-10 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 18:43:01 + Matthew Szudzik wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:59:49AM -0500, Marcus Watts wrote: > > Recent versions of xterm (237, 242) have some new options you might > > find helpful. > > > > control-center-button brings up "VT options", then > > just past "Allow 80/13

Re: Where is "Secure by default" ?

2009-03-10 Thread Travers Buda
* Artur Grabowski [2009-03-10 10:11:12]: > Han Boetes writes: > > > Paul Irofti wrote: > >> Hello Mr. Troll, thanks for flaming by. Have a good day! > > > > Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by > > stupidity. > > That doesn't seem to be a good idea when you're workin

Re: x11 problems with lenovo w500

2009-03-10 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:43:51AM +, Didier Wiroth wrote: > > > Here is a snip of the error message: > > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules//libvgahw.so > > > (II) Module vgahw: vendor="X.Org Foundation" > > >compiled for 1.5.3, module version = 0.1.0 > > >ABI class: X.Org V

Re: openbsd.org man pages case sensitive

2009-03-10 Thread ropers
> ropers wrote on Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:48:17AM +0100: > >> I've just noticed that the web-based openbsd.org man pages are >> case-sensitive. Observe: >> >> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=Umsm >> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=umsm >> >> Is this intended behaviour or a

Re: openbsd.org man pages case sensitive

2009-03-10 Thread Ingo Schwarze
ropers wrote on Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:48:17AM +0100: > I've just noticed that the web-based openbsd.org man pages are > case-sensitive. Observe: > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=Umsm > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=umsm > > Is this intended behaviour or a bug? T

Re: SNMP

2009-03-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-03-10, Brian McCann wrote: > I feel stupid for not being able to figure this out, but I'm hoping > someone can point out why this doesn't work. I'm trying to get > net-snmp working on my OpenBSD 4.4 box, and for some reason, it's > giving me very little in terms of counters. I'm looking

Re: siliconmotion+current_snapshot

2009-03-10 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:29 PM, comfooc wrote: > Hi, > did someone tested Xorg with siliconmotion LynxM+ under current > snapshot. I've made update to the snapshot last week and Xorg stoped > running - it's shouting that there was no screen found. Which is weird > because it worked properly befor

Re: Can someone please suggest a replacement for xterm for me?

2009-03-10 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 04:24:52PM +, Matthew Szudzik said that > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:16:05PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: > > hmm, on Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:45:49AM +, Matthew Szudzik said that > > > PRIMARY. So, if you've copied something to the CLIPBOARD in firefox, > > >

Re: pkg_add -u updating same package

2009-03-10 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 07:54:53PM +, Stefan Sperling said that > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 07:26:21PM +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote: > > $ sudo pkg_add -ui > > ... > > libglade2-2.6.2p2 (extracting): complete > > libglade2-2.6.2p2 (deleting): complete > > libglade2-2.6.2p2 (installing): complet

Re: OpenBSD 4.4 amd64 bsd.mp can't detect 16GB memory

2009-03-10 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:07:55 -0400 (EDT) Prakshep Dineshchandra Patel wrote: > Hi every one, > > I have installed OpenBSD 4.4 amd64 on " Dell PowerEdge 1950" which > contain 16GB of ram. > > As in that kernel 'BigMem' is already set to 1. But during boot time I > can see 4GB instead of 16GB

SNMP

2009-03-10 Thread Brian McCann
I feel stupid for not being able to figure this out, but I'm hoping someone can point out why this doesn't work. I'm trying to get net-snmp working on my OpenBSD 4.4 box, and for some reason, it's giving me very little in terms of counters. I'm looking for Ethernet interface counters and whatnot

Re: SNMP

2009-03-10 Thread Steven Surdock
The package is unfortunately not fully functional in 4.4. I ended up creating an unsupported package from the unsupported 5.4.2.1 port. I believe there were other dependent packages to recompile, but it works for me. -Steve S. > -Original Message- > From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:

OpenBSD 4.4 amd64 bsd.mp can't detect 16GB memory

2009-03-10 Thread Prakshep Dineshchandra Patel
Hi every one, I have installed OpenBSD 4.4 amd64 on " Dell PowerEdge 1950" which contain 16GB of ram. As in that kernel 'BigMem' is already set to 1. But during boot time I can see 4GB instead of 16GB ram. When I use 'Top' command it will shows around 8GB ram. Any suggestions from any one h

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:49:52 +0100 Thomas Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:04:46 -0500 > Marco Peereboom wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:30:39PM +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote: > > > Ubuntu 8.04 (Linux 2.6.24-19) powers down my system just fine > > > with halt -p (see previous post for det

Re: Article about network monitoring system developed on OpenBSD

2009-03-10 Thread ropers
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 10:53:45AM -0500, Christopher Linn wrote: >>> >>> http://labs.omniti.com/trac/reconnoiter/ 2009/2/5 Joe S : > > Are there any screenshots of Reconnoiter in action? I'm curious to see > how it looks. Apologies if this was a joke, but if it wasn't: The kind of things tha

Re: autoconf 2.62 build problem

2009-03-10 Thread Marc Espie
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:24:04PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2009-03-10, Sebastian Anding wrote: > > I tried to build subversion and ruby from ports current. While building > > autoconf 2.62 > > autoconf 2.62 needs newer m4 (in base). you have two choices: > > 1. run an unsupported

Re: Where is "Secure by default" ?

2009-03-10 Thread Marc Espie
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:11:12AM +0100, Artur Grabowski wrote: > Always attribute to malice even that which has been explained by > stupidity. Stupidity is easy to fake. Surprisingly enough, most often it's not. I've met more actual stupidity than faked one.

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Richard Verwayen
Am 10.03.2009 um 16:33 schrieb Johan L: Stefan Sperling skrev: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:34:38AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: What happens here is that the bios lies and tells us to write a value to some register and nothing happens. We have debugged several of these machines and all to

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:04:46 -0500 Marco Peereboom wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:30:39PM +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote: > > Ubuntu 8.04 (Linux 2.6.24-19) powers down my system just fine > > with halt -p (see previous post for details). > > Alrighty I'll look at that code (ugh!). > While we're

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Fulvio Ciriaco
I can confirm that this behaviour is OpenBSD specific, at least on my HP pavilion dv2000. I have also linux and netbsd here and they shutdown -p now fine. Fulvio At Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:16:57 +, Matthew Szudzik wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:34:38AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > What

Re: rack mounted intro server lab

2009-03-10 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:03:10 +0200 Lars Noodin wrote: > I've run an intial pilot of a Soekris net4801 with OpenBSD 4.4, using > gpioctl to turn on and off other machines and netboot them for console > installs. The notes below are a mess and there just to record until > they can be arranged to m

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Johan L
Stefan Sperling skrev: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:34:38AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: What happens here is that the bios lies and tells us to write a value to some register and nothing happens. We have debugged several of these machines and all to the same avail; we are doing it right but not

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Marco Peereboom
Alrighty I'll look at that code (ugh!). On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:30:39PM +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:03:57 + > Stefan Sperling wrote: > > Do people have success powering off such machines with other > > open source operating systems? If so, we could check to see > >

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Marco Peereboom
I'd love to hear see this. Back when we looked at this we did the equivalent to the other OS'. I guess we could look again but a confirmation that it works on $OS would help. On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:16:57PM +, Matthew Szudzik wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:34:38AM -0500, Marco Peereb

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Ted Unangst
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote: > What happens here is that the bios lies and tells us to write a value to > some register and nothing happens. We have debugged several of these > machines and all to the same avail; we are doing it right but nothing > happens. Maybe it i

siliconmotion+current_snapshot

2009-03-10 Thread comfooc
Hi, did someone tested Xorg with siliconmotion LynxM+ under current snapshot. I've made update to the snapshot last week and Xorg stoped running - it's shouting that there was no screen found. Which is weird because it worked properly before - no configuration changes made by me. After all I've tri

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:03:57 + Stefan Sperling wrote: > Do people have success powering off such machines with other > open source operating systems? If so, we could check to see > if they have a magical quirk that fixes this. > > I'll try powering off my x60s with Linux later, I think I stil

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Matthew Szudzik
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:34:38AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > What happens here is that the bios lies and tells us to write a value to > some register and nothing happens. We have debugged several of these > machines and all to the same avail; we are doing it right but nothing > happens. May

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:34:38AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > What happens here is that the bios lies and tells us to write a value to > some register and nothing happens. We have debugged several of these > machines and all to the same avail; we are doing it right but nothing > happens. Do

Re: How long it should take for a fsck to check a 300GB hdd?

2009-03-10 Thread Schöberle Dániel
> > > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 5:10 PM > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Tomas wrote: > > > > Like the subject implies - I would like to know how long it > > > should take for > > > > a fsck to check a 300GB hdd. I think that my pc's fsck is > > > checking a 300GB > > > > for too long - ab

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Marco Peereboom
What happens here is that the bios lies and tells us to write a value to some register and nothing happens. We have debugged several of these machines and all to the same avail; we are doing it right but nothing happens. Maybe it is an idea to complain to the vendor.

Re: autoconf 2.62 build problem

2009-03-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-03-10, Sebastian Anding wrote: > I tried to build subversion and ruby from ports current. While building > autoconf 2.62 autoconf 2.62 needs newer m4 (in base). you have two choices: 1. run an unsupported frankenstein system with parts of -current and parts of 4.4. if you do this, ple

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Aaron Stellman
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:31:09PM +, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:40:44PM +0800, David Schulz wrote: > I've been seeing this with my x60s, too. For ages. From about 4.4 release > till up to now, don't know if it ever worked before 4.4. > > I don't know how to fix it. >

Re: autoconf 2.62 build problem

2009-03-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:40:35PM +0100, Sebastian Anding wrote: > I tried to build subversion and ruby from ports current. While building > autoconf 2.62 > I in the following error: > dmesg follows: > OpenBSD 4.4 (GENERIC) #1021: Tue Aug 12 17:16:55 MDT 2008 > dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/us

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Aaron W. Hsu
David, On 10-Mar-2009 David Schulz wrote: > ThinkPad X200 running with a recent Snapshot (Feb28-09), so 4.5 beta, > oftentimes does not power down the machine when using halt -p. > Sometimes it does, often enough it does not. There is a Bug Report in > the Bug Tracker for a ThinkPad T20 running u

Re: Bug OpenBGPD, IPv6 peer gets cleared, never gets up again

2009-03-10 Thread Arnoud Vermeer
Hi, Elisa and I were looking at the production-pilot logs last night and noticed the following: Mar 10 04:41:45 radix-new bgpd[25100]: neighbor 2001:7f8:1::a501:6265:2 (LEASEWEB-v6-02) AS16265: withdraw 2001:1af8::/32 Mar 10 04:41:45 radix-new bgpd[12120]: neighbor 2001:7f8:1::a504:8345:1 (XSN

autoconf 2.62 build problem

2009-03-10 Thread Sebastian Anding
I tried to build subversion and ruby from ports current. While building autoconf 2.62 I in the following error: ===> Building for autoconf-2.62 make all-recursive Making all in bin autom4te_perllibdir='..'/lib AUTOM4TE_CFG='../lib/autom4te.cfg' ..

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Adam Emanuel
The same here, for HP Pavilion dv6312 laptop On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Didier Wiroth wrote: > Hello, > I have the same issue here on a lenovo w500 (model 4063-34g). > Didier > > OpenBSD 4.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Fri Mar 6 08:17:59 CET 2009 >r...@406334g.wiroth.net:/usr/obj/kernels

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:40:44 +0800 David Schulz wrote: > Hello all, > > ThinkPad X200 running with a recent Snapshot (Feb28-09), so 4.5 beta, > oftentimes > does not power down the machine when using halt -p. Sometimes it does, often > enough it does not. [...] FWIW, my workstation does not pow

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Didier Wiroth
Hello, I have the same issue here on a lenovo w500 (model 4063-34g). Didier OpenBSD 4.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Fri Mar 6 08:17:59 CET 2009 r...@406334g.wiroth.net:/usr/obj/kernels/GENERIC.MP real mem = 3174764544 (3027MB) avail mem = 3066773504 (2924MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: S

Re: halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:40:44PM +0800, David Schulz wrote: > Hello all, > > ThinkPad X200 running with a recent Snapshot (Feb28-09), so 4.5 beta, > oftentimes > does not power down the machine when using halt -p. Sometimes it does, often > enough it does not. I've been seeing this with my x60

halt -p does not powerdown ThinkPad X200 under 4.5beta

2009-03-10 Thread David Schulz
Hello all, ThinkPad X200 running with a recent Snapshot (Feb28-09), so 4.5 beta, oftentimes does not power down the machine when using halt -p. Sometimes it does, often enough it does not. There is a Bug Report in the Bug Tracker for a ThinkPad T20 running under 4.4, which has the exact same Prob

Re: Fail to use ste driver on sparc64 arch

2009-03-10 Thread Eric Belhomme
Le mardi 10 mars 2009 C 10:24 +, Stuart Henderson a C)crit : > I would look through a driver which was already converted and see what > was done. vr(4) doesn't look to be a bad choice, since it was done in > stages, so there are small commits you can look at (look at jason@'s > commits in Oct

Re: x11 problems with lenovo w500

2009-03-10 Thread Didier Wiroth
> > Here is a snip of the error message: > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules//libvgahw.so > > (II) Module vgahw: vendor="X.Org Foundation" > >compiled for 1.5.3, module version = 0.1.0 > >ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 4.1 > > (II) intel(0): Creating default Display subs

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Fail to use ste driver on sparc64 arch

2009-03-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/03/10 10:40, Eric Belhomme wrote: > Le mardi 10 mars 2009 ` 09:24 +, Stuart Henderson a icrit : > > > > > ste*at pci? # D-Link DFE 580TX > > > > It will need more than that, this driver needs to be converted to > > use bus_dma instead of vtophys. If you need a wor

Re: How long it should take for a fsck to check a 300GB hdd?

2009-03-10 Thread Tomas
> > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 5:10 PM > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Tomas wrote: > > > Like the subject implies - I would like to know how long it > > should take for > > > a fsck to check a 300GB hdd. I think that my pc's fsck is > > checking a 300GB > > > for too long - about 45 minutes

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Fail to use ste driver on sparc64 arch

2009-03-10 Thread Eric Belhomme
Le mardi 10 mars 2009 C 09:24 +, Stuart Henderson a C)crit : > > ste*at pci? # D-Link DFE 580TX > > It will need more than that, this driver needs to be converted to > use bus_dma instead of vtophys. If you need a working 4-port ethernet > now, Sun QFE cards work and they

Re: Fail to use ste driver on sparc64 arch

2009-03-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/03/10 08:25, Eric Belhomme wrote: > > So I tried to recompile my own kernel, customising the GENERIC config > file by adding this line : > > ste*at pci? # D-Link DFE 580TX It will need more than that, this driver needs to be converted to use bus_dma instead of vtophys

Re: How long it should take for a fsck to check a 300GB hdd?

2009-03-10 Thread Schöberle Dániel
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 5:10 PM > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Tomas wrote: > > Like the subject implies - I would like to know how long it > should take for > > a fsck to check a 300GB hdd. I think that my pc's fsck is > checking a 300GB > > for too long - about 45 minutes. And during i

Re: Where is "Secure by default" ?

2009-03-10 Thread Artur Grabowski
Han Boetes writes: > Paul Irofti wrote: >> Hello Mr. Troll, thanks for flaming by. Have a good day! > > Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by > stupidity. That doesn't seem to be a good idea when you're working with security. Weren't we talking about "secure by default"

Fail to use ste driver on sparc64 arch

2009-03-10 Thread Eric Belhomme
Hi guys, I'm trying to use a D-Link DFE580TX quad-nic card on a Sun Ultra5 station (sparc64 arch). This card is supposed to work well with ste driver, but it seems it is not included in the GENERIC 4.4 kernel... according to the dmesg, the card seems to be detected by the kernel : console is key