* Joel Wiramu Pauling [2011-02-01 01:40]:
> The better option is to acquire IPv6 transit someway
getting ipvshit is never a better option.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Serv
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:55 AM,
wrote:
> I ran "host www.google.com" on a new OpenBSD 4.8 install and got this:
>
> 13:50:28.132052 127.0.0.1.41209 > 127.0.0.1.48830: udp 31
> 13:50:28.132081 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: icmp: 127.0.0.1 udp port 48830
> unreachable
> 13:50:29.133552 ::1.38033 > ::1.48
[IMAGE]
!Promociones Especiales para grupos!
Capacitacisn Impartida por: Mtro. Alberto Ledesma Gonzalez.
Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico presenta:
Licitaciones Pzblicas para la Ley de PEMEX.
Experto Consultor Mtro. Alberto Ledesma Gonzalez
Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg. COLG640205CP
http://www.recadosnoorkut.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/real-santander.jpg
Prezado Cliente,
I com grande satisfagco que a equipe de seguranga do Internet Banking
Real Santander envia este e-mail a vocj cliente.
o motivo pelo qual estamos entrando em contato para alertar que seu
Cartco Chave
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
> Does the PS3 support ipv6? Are Sony's servers IPv6 compliant. The
> better option is to acquire IPv6 transit someway (either by
> terminating a tunnel broker pipe and advertising RA from your openbsd
> box) or better still switching to
[IMAGE]
!Promociones Especiales para grupos!
Capacitacisn Impartida por: Mtro. Gerardo Coronado Lspez
Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico presenta:
Seminario- Taller Supervisisn de Personal y Grupos Altamente Efectivos
Experto Consultor Mtro. Gerardo Coronado Lspez
Empresa Registrada ante la
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:43:30 -0500
Dustin Cannon wrote:
> Perhaps it's just a matter of
> someone being interested enough to take the plunge?
And decide whether they think it's worthwhile or more important than
other things to work on.
The FreeBSD jail is quite quite cool in some respects, and
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:27:18PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
>>
>> i don't understand the confusion. we have a state table (let me
>> nitpick: it's a tree). a packet comes in. we do a lookup in the table,
>> looking for an entry where the
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Dustin Cannon
wrote:
> or against implementing such jails in OpenBSD. Perhaps it's just a matter
of
> someone being interested enough to take the plunge? Thanks for your time
and
Yes.
google for "henning jails openbsd"
why henning? I remember reading his comment that he would like it,
brings this page.
http://www.monkey.org/openbsd/archive/misc/0409/msg00569.html
Nothing's changed AFAIK.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Dustin Cannon
wrote:
> [posting to misc since this is
Does the PS3 support ipv6? Are Sony's servers IPv6 compliant. The
better option is to acquire IPv6 transit someway (either by
terminating a tunnel broker pipe and advertising RA from your openbsd
box) or better still switching to an ISP that support native v6
service.
Kind regards
-JoelW
On 1 Fe
There is an out-of-date script in infrastructure/build . It looks to me
that it list everything installed. If it needs to be updated, it tells you
that too.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Bryan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 13:29, wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have a script to sort of
* Jason McIntyre [2011-02-01 01:14]:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:27:18PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> >
> > i don't understand the confusion. we have a state table (let me
> > nitpick: it's a tree). a packet comes in. we do a lookup in the table,
> > looking for an entry where the key fields m
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:53:31AM +1300, Paul M wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:28:13AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> >>
> >>then i change my mind and we should add a note that the default pass
> >>behaviour (NOT rule, even tho there kinda is a default rule
> >>internally...) doesn't lead to
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:27:18PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> i don't understand the confusion. we have a state table (let me
> nitpick: it's a tree). a packet comes in. we do a lookup in the table,
> looking for an entry where the key fields match the packet. keys are:
>
> protocol
> addre
[posting to misc since this is not appropriate for tech where I
originally sent it]
Hi misc,
After reading about FreeBSD jails I naturally wondered whether OpenBSD
had a similar feature. Well, I ran across sysjail. It's my
understanding that sysjail
was discontinued due to an inherent flaw invo
> $ pkg_info | grep ^banana- > /dev/null
Could also be
$ pkg_info | grep -q ^banana-
the alternative is UPnP, which you'd need a supporting daemon to add port
mappings into pf to support with an obsd gateway
Josh Smith [juice...@gmail.com] wrote:
> misc@,
>
> I recently acquired a playstation 3 and have been running into some
> difficulties playing it online behing my openbsd ga
misc@,
I recently acquired a playstation 3 and have been running into some
difficulties playing it online behing my openbsd gateway. After doing
some research and testing I have been able to overcome most of these
problems by appending the static-port option to my nat rule. I
understand the conc
* Jason McIntyre [2011-01-31 21:45]:
> > puh. not sure we're on the road to overengineering here.
> > basically, the flow is like this:
> > -we do a state lookup. if we find a mathcing state, we apply actions
> > associated with it and are done.
> > -if no state matched we traverse the ruleset. t
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 13:29, wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a script to sort of kickstart an installation after doing a
> bare install of OpenBSD, and it's designed to be idempotent (won't
> hurt to run it several times).
>
> Currently I install some packages, but that's a bit of a time-waster
>
Per cancellarti dalla news non rispondere alla mail,utilizza remo ve Per
visualizzare la news sul sito clicca qui
Servizio Recupero CreditiContributi
per la creazione di Nuove Imprese Regione LombardiaContributi
per i Poli Florovivaistici
Contributi "De Minimis " Nuove Iniziative
Contributi
per
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:28:13AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
then i change my mind and we should add a note that the default pass
behaviour (NOT rule, even tho there kinda is a default rule
internally...) doesn't lead to state creation.
Perhaps it could be worded in terms of what one should
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 01:51:15PM -0800, Sean Kamath wrote:
> %!
> newpath clippath stroke showpage
>
> These four commands were the smallest PostScript I could figure out to send to
> a printer to print something without burning up tons of toner. It should
> produce a small line all the way aro
Hi Travis,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:29 PM, wrote:
> Currently I install some packages, but that's a bit of a time-waster
> in that it will reinstall. B Is there a way I can test for whether a
> package has been installed already, given only the package name, and
> not necessarily the executabl
> > I have a script to sort of kickstart an installation after doing a
> > bare install of OpenBSD, and it's designed to be idempotent (won't
> > hurt to run it several times).
> > Currently I install some packages, but that's a bit of a time-waster
> > in that it will reinstall.
> Is there a way
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:29 PM, wrote:
> Currently I install some packages, but that's a bit of a time-waster
> in that it will reinstall. Is there a way I can test for whether a
> package has been installed already, given only the package name, and
> not necessarily the executable name (if th
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:29:40PM -0600, tra...@subspacefield.org wrote:
> I have a script to sort of kickstart an installation after doing a
> bare install of OpenBSD, and it's designed to be idempotent (won't
> hurt to run it several times).
>
> Currently I install some packages, but that's a b
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:41:02PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Jason McIntyre [2011-01-31 18:14]:
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:28:13AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > > then i change my mind and we should add a note that the default pass
> > > behaviour (NOT rule, even tho there kinda is a
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011, at 19:19:09PM GMT+01:00, Joachim Tingvold wrote:
Okay, but where goes the line between the two? I mean, does this mean
I can't use the carp-interface in the route-to at all?
pass in log on $int_if proto { tcp, udp, icmp } from $our_int_net
route-to {($ext_carp_if $e
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:10:04PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:28:13AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > then i change my mind and we should add a note that the default pass
> > behaviour (NOT rule, even tho there kinda is a default rule
> > internally...) doesn't lead
Hey all,
I ran "host www.google.com" on a new OpenBSD 4.8 install and got this:
13:50:28.132052 127.0.0.1.41209 > 127.0.0.1.48830: udp 31
13:50:28.132081 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: icmp: 127.0.0.1 udp port 48830
unreachable
13:50:29.133552 ::1.38033 > ::1.48830: udp 31
13:50:29.133577 ::1 > ::1: icmp
* Jason McIntyre [2011-01-31 18:14]:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:28:13AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > then i change my mind and we should add a note that the default pass
> > behaviour (NOT rule, even tho there kinda is a default rule
> > internally...) doesn't lead to state creation.
> it's
Hey all,
I have a script to sort of kickstart an installation after doing a
bare install of OpenBSD, and it's designed to be idempotent (won't
hurt to run it several times).
Currently I install some packages, but that's a bit of a time-waster
in that it will reinstall. Is there a way I can test
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011, at 18:53:29PM GMT+01:00, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
This does not work at all. If I change
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html#RulesetTips
+ Ruleset Tips
Filter the physical interface. As far as PF is concerned, network
traffic comes from the physical interface, not th
Hi Gilles.
On 31/01/2011, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 06:04:12PM +1030, David Walker wrote:
>
> bug, it is the default indeed but "from local" should work
>
> should work, if it doesnt it's a bug
>
> Will let you know when it's fixed
>
> Gilles Chehade
Thanks for looking at t
Le Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:24:04 +0100,
Joachim Tingvold a icrit :
> Hi,
Hello,
> This does not work at all. If I change
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html#RulesetTips
+ Ruleset Tips
Filter the physical interface. As far as PF is concerned, network
traffic comes from the physical interface,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011, at 18:24:04PM GMT+01:00, Joachim Tingvold wrote:
match out on $ext_carp_if inet from $our_int_net to any nat-to
$ext_carp_if
Do I also need to consider reply-to for this to work?
--
Joachim
Hi,
I'm trying to set up two redundant gateways using OpenBSD 4.8, CARP
and PF (see below for setup details).
I want to force packets incoming on carp1, out on carp0 (and NAT it,
using carp0's IP).
Here's the output from /etc/pf.conf on GW0;
<<
# Interfaces
pfsync_if="em4
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:28:13AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> then i change my mind and we should add a note that the default pass
> behaviour (NOT rule, even tho there kinda is a default rule
> internally...) doesn't lead to state creation.
>
it's not going to be easy deciding where to in
Now I'm in trouble! ;-)
I've been using IPv6 via tunnel for a while, with decent success.
Lately, I have found an ISP here in Germany who hands out free native
IPv6 access, which is to be used on top of the existing DSL line. And I
already have an account with them.
How do I configure PPPoE for
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 09:37:24AM +, Dennis den Brok wrote:
> Jan Stary schrieb:
> > "fo" just forces a form feed;
> > it doesn't "turn PS support on/off" or whatever.
>
> Certainly not, but it seems the printer is picky about recognizing
> PostScript as such. I don't know what data actually
Otto Moerbeek schrieb:
> printcap sh is your friend.
It is indeed, thank you.
--
Dennis den Brok
On 2011-01-26 19:05, Jeff Ross wrote:
On 01/26/11 10:44, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda skrev 2011-01-26 16:39:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Hello list.
I'm quite new to Openbsd, have used Freebsd for a while.
I have a newly installed Openbsd syste
On 2011-01-27 16:39, Orestes Leal R. wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:56:02AM +0100, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Upon installation of noip I ran the command noip2 -C to configure it.
I want noip to run a script every 30 minutes that sends a mail to me
at the end of the updating of the address.
So I
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 06:04:12PM +1030, David Walker wrote:
> Howdy.
>
> I was setting up smtpd on a machine today and I noticed a couple of issues.
>
> This does not work:
> accept from local for domain example.com relay
> This does:
> accept for domain example.com relay
>
> I realize "from l
Try search by "proxychains" it may help you
Best Regards,
spawn
2011/1/28 Jiri B.
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 07:52:34AM -0800, James Hozier wrote:
> > I'm looking for a program that I can use to use SOCKS proxies for various
> programs,
> > such as different IRC clients (ircII, irssi, etc.) an
* Peter Hessler [2011-01-31 09:37]:
> On 2011 Jan 30 (Sun) at 22:48:17 +0100 (+0100), Henning Brauer wrote:
> :* Peter Hessler [2011-01-30 22:23]:
> :> On 2011 Jan 30 (Sun) at 19:04:50 +0100 (+0100), Henning Brauer wrote:
> :> :* Stuart Henderson [2011-01-30 19:03]:
> :> :> I disagree, I think i
Gentile Cliente,
Abbiamo rilevato attivita irregolari sul tuo BCC
Internet banking sul conto 31/01/2011.
Per la tua protezione, necessario verificare questo
attivita prima di poter continuare a utilizzare il
conto.
Si prega di scaricare il documento allegato alla presente
e-mail a rivede
I should have mentioned this is on 4.8 and of course it could be user
error which wouldn't surprise me overly.
Best wishes.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 09:37:24AM +, Dennis den Brok wrote:
> Jan Stary schrieb:
> > "fo" just forces a form feed;
> > it doesn't "turn PS support on/off" or whatever.
>
> Certainly not, but it seems the printer is picky about recognizing
> PostScript as such. I don't know what data actuall
Jan Stary schrieb:
> "fo" just forces a form feed;
> it doesn't "turn PS support on/off" or whatever.
Certainly not, but it seems the printer is picky about recognizing
PostScript as such. I don't know what data actually hits the wire,
maybe there is some bogus data sent before the actual PostScr
Si vous ne visualisez pas ce message, suivez ce lien
Pour chaque dossier transmis par Internet, 1 ? est versi ` l'association +
Entrepreneurs du Monde ;, qui accompagne des dizaines de milliers de
micro-entreprises dans le monde par l'attribution de microcridits accordis aux
entrepreneurs les
Howdy.
I was setting up smtpd on a machine today and I noticed a couple of issues.
This does not work:
accept from local for domain example.com relay
This does:
accept for domain example.com relay
I realize "from local" is the default.
This does not work:
accept from all deliver to maildir /var
On 2011 Jan 30 (Sun) at 22:48:17 +0100 (+0100), Henning Brauer wrote:
:* Peter Hessler [2011-01-30 22:23]:
:> On 2011 Jan 30 (Sun) at 19:04:50 +0100 (+0100), Henning Brauer wrote:
:> :* Stuart Henderson [2011-01-30 19:03]:
:> :> I disagree, I think it is worth mentioning explicity - I have seen
:
55 matches
Mail list logo
