I've been told I succeed from time to time. :)
Men I fell bad now! Only from time to time!?
Men, you are doing an incredible job and I sure hell do not envy you by
a very long shut!
I am the first buyer of Nick book with plenty of Nick-isims in it! (;>
The FAQ is actually what got me going
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 12:25:09AM -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:
| In the caveats section it states the following:
|
|
| Passing the output of find to other programs requires some care:
|
|$ find . -name \*.jpg | xargs rm
| or
|$ rm `find . -name \*.jpg`
|
| w
In the caveats section it states the following:
Passing the output of find to other programs requires some care:
$ find . -name \*.jpg | xargs rm
or
$ rm `find . -name \*.jpg`
would, given files ``important .jpg'' and ``important'', remove
``important'
On 9 February 2011 12:37, woolsherpahat wrote:
>>> On 6 February 2011 05:23, Alessandro Baggi
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi List, i had registered me to the security list:
>>> security-annou...@openbsd.org since 9 Genuary 2011, but any email come on my
>>> account. Some that had security list subscribtion,
On 02/08/11 15:45, Mihai Popescu wrote:
...
> I will send here another thing. I hope it will be received nicely. I
> mean I don't know how to tell it to be nice for everyone. But I will
> tell it: parts of FAQ go into being more difficult and more abstract
> than the style it use to be back in time
Gentile Cliente,
certo di farle cosa utile e gradita, le comunico alcune
soluzioni economiche per l'azienda o personali
Avr` la possibilit` di pubblicizzare la propria azienda o cercare
l'affare fra gli annunci dei nostri clienti ( tutto gratis )
Clicca_qui
Cordialmente
La direzione
>> On 6 February 2011 05:23, Alessandro Baggi
>> wrote:
>> Hi List, i had registered me to the security list:
>> security-annou...@openbsd.org since 9 Genuary 2011, but any email come on my
>> account. Some that had security list subscribtion, can tell me if since
>> 09/01/2001 at today there are
[IMAGE]
Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg. COLG640205CP30005 Smguenos en
Twitter@pmscapacitacion o bien en Facebook PMS de Mixico
Extendemos una cordial invitacisn a este seminario y con gusto esperamos
su respuesta.
Gestisn Total de Almacenes 360
Almacenes 360 tiene como objetivo que el almac
On 02/08/11 12:45, Mihai Popescu wrote:
OK, reading this, what to do next? If I will be concerned, i will
wait. But why I should be concerned ? If I'm not concerned, can I
install with wrong checksum? ...
I think you need this:
http://psychcentral.com/therapy/
http://www.mentalhelp.n
[IMAGE]
Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg. COLG640205CP30005 Smguenos en
Twitter@pmscapacitacion o bien en Facebook PMS de Mixico
Extendemos una cordial invitacisn a este seminario y con gusto esperamos
su respuesta.
Planeacisn Estratigica e Integracisn de Balanced Scorecard en su Empresa
Est
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Alexander Hall wrote:
> On 02/08/11 22:06, Alexander Hall wrote:
>> On 02/08/11 19:29, patric conant wrote:
>>
>>> I like the idea of a misc@ man page, think of all the typing that could be
>>> saved with RTFM@MP.
>
> Ah. _man_ page. not _web_ page. well, nm.
No pr
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:29, patric conant wrote:
>>
> I like the idea of a misc@ man page, think of all the typing that could be
> saved with RTFM@MP.
>
>
RTFFAQ?
Hello all,
Things got out of my hand and I want to say something and close this thread.
There were some other posts in this thread which I consider are
off-topic. I got also direct email telling me I should not blame
Henning and other developers.
I will try again to explain, moving myself off-top
I am not so educated as others, i use OBSD since 2001-2002, with many
dificulties, but i have undertood that there are only 2 different kind
of persons. Developers and users, developers work for them, and users
recive the collateral benefit using OBSD.
If you use OpenBSD since 2001-2002 I think
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Pieter Verberne
wrote:
> un-nfs3 that is. nfs4 uses tcp by default.
nfs4 itself is rather un-nfs like... :)
On 02/08/11 22:06, Alexander Hall wrote:
> On 02/08/11 19:29, patric conant wrote:
>
>> I like the idea of a misc@ man page, think of all the typing that could be
>> saved with RTFM@MP.
Ah. _man_ page. not _web_ page. well, nm.
/Alexander
>>
>
> Lo and behold! The future is already here!
>
>
On 02/08/11 19:29, patric conant wrote:
> I like the idea of a misc@ man page, think of all the typing that could be
> saved with RTFM@MP.
>
Lo and behold! The future is already here!
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc
;-)
> Linux uses tcp by default? How un-nfs.
It's linux you are talking about. You shouldn't be surprised.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:59 AM, fqui nonez wrote:
> 2011/2/8 Mihai Popescu :
> > Hi Henning,
> >
> > It looks like you are in a bad mood. Please read my entire post and
> > don't cut and paste out of context.
> > Man, if you do not want to answer, please don't. You have spent a lot
> > of time b
On 02/08/11 08:43, Jeff Ross wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
Are you using altq?
Yes, using the hfsc scheduler. I think that was the hint I needed. udp
packets were all being assigned to the dns queue so I added another
match rule to put openvpn traffic into the default queue.
Here's what I ha
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 20:20:18 +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 07:15:26PM +0100, David Steiner wrote:
> Did you try udp v3 mounts? That's the default for a reason.
>
>-Otto
>
that did the trick!
(on linux it defaulted to tcp, and i first thought udp would be
unreliable
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:15:26 +0100, David Steiner wrote:
Did you try udp v3 mounts? That's the default for a reason.
-Otto
that did the trick!
(on linux it defaulted to tcp, and i first thought udp would be
unreliable so never tried that.)
cheers
Oh, I didn't read your mail well. Yes
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 07:15:26PM +0100, David Steiner wrote:
> > Did you try udp v3 mounts? That's the default for a reason.
> >
> >-Otto
> >
>
> that did the trick!
> (on linux it defaulted to tcp, and i first thought udp would be
> unreliable so never tried that.)
Linux uses tcp by d
> Did you try udp v3 mounts? That's the default for a reason.
>
>-Otto
>
that did the trick!
(on linux it defaulted to tcp, and i first thought udp would be
unreliable so never tried that.)
cheers
CURSO TALLER
El Credito y la Cobranza... Una Actividad de Exito.
Duracion: (1 dia) 10 hrs.
Inversion: $4,400 pesos mas IVA
Objetivo: Conocer por medio de practicas vivenciales las razones por las
que una empresa tiene ixito al otorg
2011/2/8 Mihai Popescu :
> Hi Henning,
>
> It looks like you are in a bad mood. Please read my entire post and
> don't cut and paste out of context.
> Man, if you do not want to answer, please don't. You have spent a lot
> of time bitching and no time to give a damn clear answer.
> It's not my prob
Henning was being nice. This stupid question keeps coming up. Yes, it
is a stupid question and yes it is annoying and yes Henning should
remind you of that. The so called good answers have been provided a
trillion times by now. Learn how to use the internet or get of it.
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 a
I'm attempting to exclude ssh traffic from host to host IPSec transport
traffic. And not having much success on the OpenBSD side (OpenBSD to
Racoon.)
Here's what ipsec.conf looks like:
--- ipsec.conf ---
flow esp proto tcp from any to any port 22 type bypass
ike esp transport from 10.222.0.
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 05:05:20PM +0100, David Steiner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Pieter Verberne
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:02:31 +0100, Pieter Verberne wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> See thread at the bottom. I have also problems reading files while
> >> mounting from
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Pieter Verberne
wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:02:31 +0100, Pieter Verberne wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> See thread at the bottom. I have also problems reading files while
>> mounting from Ubuntu. I cannot read files larger than +/- 18KB.
>>
>> /etc/exports:
>> /home/
> So the process I thought about it's not true. Better to remove the
> SHA256 then, what purpose can it serve if it is not syncronised?
> I still don't figure out why this checksum missmatch is ( on the same
> server, not among servers).
The troll haas been planted.
Methinks this project is somehow about good code, not good moods.
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
> Of Mihai Popescu
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 9:19 AM
> To: misc
> Subject: Re: is SHA256 file used or not ?
>
> Hi Hennin
Hi Henning,
It looks like you are in a bad mood. Please read my entire post and
don't cut and paste out of context.
Man, if you do not want to answer, please don't. You have spent a lot
of time bitching and no time to give a damn clear answer.
It's not my problem that you attract idiots ( I failed
[4.8/amd64]
Hello,
Is there a way to change the dump device without rebuilding the kernel?
That's not clear if "config(8) -e" is able to do this.
Thanks, regards.
Stuart Henderson wrote:
Are you using altq?
Yes, using the hfsc scheduler. I think that was the hint I needed.
udp packets were all being assigned to the dns queue so I added another
match rule to put openvpn traffic into the default queue.
Here's what I have now:
match in all scrub
Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:55:51AM +1030, David Walker wrote:
>> I have a machine at work, beige box with 4.8 on it that doesn't like
>> hotplugd.
>> I thought it might be the issue with 16 USB devices failing attach so
>> Any ideas welcome.
> try -current
Thanks Jacob.
[IMAGE] Mexico Lunes 7 de febrero del 2011
Escucha el videomensaje aca
que nuestra amistad dure para toda la vida
Tu amigo es : car
[IMAGE]
Envie un mensaje a su amigo desde aqui
Copyright 2011, Terra Networks, S.A. Mexico
Security Code: D:Inetpubwwwrootwebsensenewdesign
Dr.sci. Sam Semir Osmanagich
Foreign member of the Russian
Academy of Natural Sciences
www.samosmanagich.com
B
Date: January 28th, 2011.
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE BOSNIAN PYRAMID DISCOVERY
B
B In April 2005 I first traveled to the town of Visoko, 20 miles
northwest from Sarajevo, the capita
Are you using altq?
On 2011-02-07, Jeff Ross wrote:
> On 02/07/11 12:33, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
>> On 7 February 2011 16:53, Jeff Ross wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I found this explanation for the following OpenVPN error
>>> "write UDPv4: No buffer space available (code=55)"
>>>
>>> "N
Dear Visa Cardholder,
Continuous Monitoring is an integral part of Visa's multiple layers of
security. In addition to other fraud monitoring tools, we can often spot
fraud based upon transactions on the card that are outside of cardholders
typical purchasing pattern.
This allows us to spot fraudul
> Maybe some of user will eventually
> get a clue glueing all the answer scattered on this list and FAQ.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#shamismatch
That entry contains all the relevant details end users should need,
which is "we're aware that checksum mismatches happen on snapshots;
it's no
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:22:19AM +0200, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> Hello Henning,
>
> I wasn't aware that I need permission to continue a thread.
> Excuse me for my missunderstanding, but think I'm not involved in the
> release and compile procedures. If you don't like to answer, please
> don't.
>
Hello Henning,
I wasn't aware that I need permission to continue a thread.
Excuse me for my missunderstanding, but think I'm not involved in the
release and compile procedures. If you don't like to answer, please
don't.
As a matter of fact, most of list users preffer to joke and to write
something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
I still have this issue with 4.9. Please let me know if I could assist
with any additional data. During the last week I had this problem about
3 times, so I can run tests when the issue is present but I don't know
what I could check.
I can say
44 matches
Mail list logo
