Re: OpenBSD 5.0 Snapshot: ASUS Wireless Card - Not Configured

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Steven wrote: > Hi, > > I recently purchased an ASUS PCE-N15 Wireless-N PCI-E Adapter. > > http://www.asus.com/Networks/Wireless_Adapters/PCEN15/ > > After i installed it and restarted my computer I got this in the > dmesg (I'm assuming this is the ASUS adapter as i

Re: Ted Unangst Static Source Code Analysis

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Lars wrote: > I was watching an older video regarding Static Source code analysis to > make code more secure. B I especially enjoyed your comments about SQL > injections and escaping sql which all sorts of websites forget to do. > > What tools are used in OpenBSD fo

OpenBSD 5.0 Snapshot: ASUS Wireless Card - Not Configured

Hi, I recently purchased an ASUS PCE-N15 Wireless-N PCI-E Adapter. http://www.asus.com/Networks/Wireless_Adapters/PCEN15/ After i installed it and restarted my computer I got this in the dmesg (I'm assuming this is the ASUS adapter as it's the only new device message I noticed in the logs. I'll

Re: OpenBSD as router for UK FTTC?

http://www.sinet.bt.com/506v1p0.pdf

Ted Unangst Static Source Code Analysis

I was watching an older video regarding Static Source code analysis to make code more secure. I especially enjoyed your comments about SQL injections and escaping sql which all sorts of websites forget to do. What tools are used in OpenBSD for static source code analysis? I guess Lint is consider

Re: dual dvi with 2 monitors, 1 dvi is not detected

On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 10:02:22PM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote: > Hmm ... unfortunately, I'm not a programmer. I guess I'll have to buy > another brand/card. > I had a look at the ati driver manual >

Re: dual dvi with 2 monitors, 1 dvi is not detected

Jure Pe?ar wrote: > I remember Matrox G450 as being well supported even by XFree86. They have > G550 dual dvi model, no expirience with it though. Well, since we seem to be reminiscing instead of checking current facts--which would be work and sort of boring, you know, so why bother--let me tell

Re: dual dvi with 2 monitors, 1 dvi is not detected

On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 22:02:22 +0100 Didier Wiroth wrote: > Are there other brands I could have a look, I would really appreciate > your feedback. I remember Matrox G450 as being well supported even by XFree86. They have G550 dual dvi model, no expirience with it though. -- Jure PeD ar

Re: dual dvi with 2 monitors, 1 dvi is not detected

Hmm ... unfortunately, I'm not a programmer. I guess I'll have to buy another brand/card. I had a look at the ati driver manual . I checked many online shops, but I was not able to fi

Re: dual dvi with 2 monitors, 1 dvi is not detected

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 04:15:53PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 03:52:40PM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote: > > Hello, > > I've purchased a zotac nvidia geforce 210 graphic card. it has a dual > > dvi output, which I was hoping to use with xorg and 2 monitors. > > Note for the fut

Re: OpenBSD as router for UK FTTC?

For the archives sake, we finally solved this. pppoe(4) never requests an mru during lcp negotiation (and acks any reasonable mru offered). In our case we were being offered an mru (1492) by the BT AC (BRAS) which we ack'd. With the mru agreed at both ends of the link our auth with the BT bras succ

Re: Router performance - high BDP and low transfer speeds

On 1/6/2012 11:13 PM, Hassan Monfared wrote: Hi, have you tried timeout and optimization settings in PF ? try : set optimization high-latency or set optimization conservative Thanks for the ideas. I did consider the high-latency setting, but have not tried it. My understanding (which might be

Re: Router performance - high BDP and low transfer speeds

On 1/7/2012 4:48 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote: I'm trying to troubleshoot some performance issues for high speed data transfers across a long network path with a fairly high bandwidth delay. Any difference between TCP and UDP? I haven't been able to compare

Re: Daily digest, Issue 2350 (31 messages)

Henning Brauer wrote: >* Pete Vickers [2012-01-06 11:38]: >> Just a quick question to see if anyone's working on implementing the above on >> OpenBSD, and in particular it's integration with OpenBGPD/OpenOSPF ? Note >> that >> this is not a 'please can I have this feature for free' or suchlike,

Re: inet6 autoconfprivacy broken on -current ?

Le 02/01/2012 6:00 PM, Mattieu Baptiste a icrit : On my machine running -current/amd64, inet6 autoconfprivacy seems to broke neighbor sol/adv. I just tested this and it works for me. Sorry. Simon

Routing to public ip of pppoe(4) interface

Hi, for every address of a local interface a loopback route is created on demand. Those routes look like the second one here: 192.168.123.252/30 link#3 UC 10 - 4 vr2 192.168.123.25300:0d:b9:24:60:42 UHLc 04 - 4 lo0 But this mechanism

Re: Router performance - high BDP and low transfer speeds

In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote: > I'm trying to troubleshoot some performance issues for high speed data > transfers across a long network path with a fairly high bandwidth delay. Any difference between TCP and UDP? As a test to help pinpoint things, can you try passing the traffic near the

Re: OpenBSDd functionality equal to "neighbor allowas-in"?

You can work around this by pointing a default at your provider, too. But it is kind of yucky. On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 09:21:35AM +0100, Pete Vickers wrote: > SOO can be used for loop detection, but only if your bgp peerings don't strip > extended communities. > > another dirty hack would be to g

Re: OpenBSDd functionality equal to "neighbor allowas-in"?

SOO can be used for loop detection, but only if your bgp peerings don't strip extended communities. another dirty hack would be to get the peer to aggregate your 'remote' prefixes towards you (without as-set) to conceal the ASN. beware that ebgp routes are prefered over ibgp by default though - th

Ocean freight from China ,Jan 2012

HiMuhammad IMRAN,Happy new year ,my dear friend. Hope we have good luck and close relationship in this nice year. We update O/F to your side, share it with you as normal. By the way, many carrier cut some vessels before our Chinese New year holiday, any accurate info, contact us any time. PO