On 01/12/12 00:05, Markus Wernig wrote:
> If I set net.inet.carp.log=7, I get lots of the following on both fws,
> only for carp1 and carp2, never for carp0 and carp3:
> carp2: ip_output failed: 65
> carp1: ip_output failed: 65
> carp2: ip_output failed: 65
> carp1: ip_output failed: 65
> carp2: i
* Stuart Henderson [120111 19:00]:
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:42:11 + (UTC)
From: Stuart Henderson
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 5.0 Snapshot: ASUS Wireless Card - Not Configured
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (OpenBSD)
Sender: owner-m...@open
I have a web server handling predominantly https traffic sitting on a DMZ
behind a CARP'd firewall of two ALIX 2D3s.
Since the firewall is NATting traffic to the web server, the source IP of
requests arriving at the web server is always the firewall's CARP address on
the DMZ. I'd like the server
Steven's method has worked for me as well, with OpenVPN on OpenBSD 4.9.
Lawrence
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 07:48:55PM -0500, Steven Surdock wrote:
> I ran OpenVPN on the loopback and did an rdr (back in the day). It has
> worked for me.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=119446553412564&w=2
>
476525
[IMAGE]
Pms de Mixico prestigiada firma de Capacitacisn presenta:
La Asistente Ejecutiva Moderna
-Mas de 900 asistentes satisfechas nos respaldansupera con ixito los
retos del 2012.
-Obtenga las herramientas necesarias para alcanzar un sptimo desempeqo en
su funcisn.
!Reciba la inform
On 2012-01-11, Steven wrote:
> * Christiano F. Haesbaert [120109 08:45]:
>>On 9 January 2012 02:21, Steven wrote:
>>> IC. Any recommendations for a good replacement wireless card? I've
>>> read the list on the FAQ, but my experience in wireless cards is
>>> (besides the ASUS card) practically n
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:08 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
>> > Agreed, .. but if locate.update does NOT run as root, that would seem to
>> > indicate some problem other than permissions.
>>
>> If you're saying what I think you're saying, then I disagree
I ran OpenVPN on the loopback and did an rdr (back in the day). It has
worked for me.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=119446553412564&w=2
-Steve S.
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
> Of Dr.-Ing. Torsten Finke
> Sent: Wednes
On 01/11/12 14:24, Barry Grumbine wrote:
>> Bite the bullet, upgrade, life is better at 5.0
>>
>
> ...knew I forgot something.
>
> There aren't many North American mirrors that go back to 4.2. I was
> fortunate to find "obsd.cec.mtu.edu" which Nick Holland recently
> notified us that he needs to
Hi all! very simple PF question, is it possible to limit the number of
ICMP echo replies, like 5/min from any source address ?
TIA!
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
> > Agreed, .. but if locate.update does NOT run as root, that would seem to
> > indicate some problem other than permissions.
>
> If you're saying what I think you're saying, then I disagree and think
> your logic is backwards.
> What user do you think
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:18 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
...
>> Ah, but that's *not* how locate.updatedb is invoked by the cronjob!
>> There's a reason I called out the need to mimic that when trying to
>> replicate the problem while walking through locat
* Tomas Bodzar [120108 00:00]:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Steven
wrote:
Hi,
I recently purchased an ASUS PCE-N15 Wireless-N PCI-E Adapter.
http://www.asus.com/Networks/Wireless_Adapters/PCEN15/
Details from pcidump will be maybe useful for developers, but it seems
like you have some W
Am 12.01.12 00:13, schrieb Philip Guenther:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
...
([foobar@bistromath]<~>)$ time sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
Password:
Ah, but that's *not* how locate.updatedb is invoked by the cronjob!
There's a reason I called out the need to mimic
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> ...
> > ([foobar@bistromath] <~>)$ time sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
> > Password:
>
> Ah, but that's *not* how locate.updatedb is invoked by the cronjob!
> There's a reason I called out th
BSDCan 2012 will be held 11-12 May, 2012 in Ottawa at the University of
Ottawa. It will be preceded by two days of tutorials on 9-10 May.
NOTE: This will be Fri/Sat with tutorials on Wed/Thu.
We are now accepting proposals for talks.
The talks should be designed with a very strong technical cont
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
...
> ([foobar@bistromath] <~>)$ time sudo /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
> Password:
Ah, but that's *not* how locate.updatedb is invoked by the cronjob!
There's a reason I called out the need to mimic that when trying to
replicate the problem
Hello all
I have recently upgraded a pair of CARPed firewalls from 4.6 to 5.0
(late, I know ...) after almost 2 years of absolutely flawless operation
(ipv4 interfaces only).
I have changed all the nat/rdr rules in pf.conf to the new syntax, not
changed any other fw/nw setting (at least to my kno
* Christiano F. Haesbaert [120109 08:45]:
On 9 January 2012 02:21, Steven wrote:
IC. Any recommendations for a good replacement wireless card? I've
read the list on the FAQ, but my experience in wireless cards is
(besides the ASUS card) practically nil.
Should I just hang on to the ASUS and
Am 11.01.12 22:34, schrieb Ted Unangst:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012, L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 01:30 PM 1/11/2012, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
4.3 was released May 1, 2008. That's almost 4 years old software. What
are you expecting here? Someone to check out the code from that
version and deeply inspect what
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> At 01:30 PM 1/11/2012, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
>
>>4.3 was released May 1, 2008. That's almost 4 years old software. What
>>are you expecting here? Someone to check out the code from that
>>version and deeply inspect what may be causing your problem, that
On 01/11/2012 05:12 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
If only one disk is affected at a time, 5.0 is the fastest, and has the
most trouble with responsiveness while being fast, this is likely to be
improved by a fair I/O scheduler. There is a generic framework
Ted Unangst [t...@tedunangst.com] wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>
> > There's also an issue with dirty buffers getting eaten up, but that is
> > prominent on slow devices, and you'd be WAITing in buf_needva in that case.
>
> I don't think needva has been totally ruled out
L. V. Lammert wrote:
> At 01:04 PM 1/11/2012, Barry Grumbine wrote:
>>Bite the bullet, upgrade, life is better at 5.0
>
> Sorry, but *UPGRADING* isn't the question - the question is why
> locate is not working properly. If nobody has ever seen such a
> problem, it would be quite more forthright to
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> If only one disk is affected at a time, 5.0 is the fastest, and has the
> most trouble with responsiveness while being fast, this is likely to be
> improved by a fair I/O scheduler. There is a generic framework in place
> now for schedulers to get plu
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:09 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> Lesson #1: examine the anomalous data for clues.
>>
>> So, you're saying that
>> locate /usr | grep ^/usr | head
>>
>> returns nothing but
>
> Yep! As does locate /usr
>
>> locate /home |
Also, in order to help others when they encounter a similar issue,
please be sure to post what the problem and/or solution were once you
figure them out.
Philip Guenther
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
> Lesson #1: examine the anomalous data for clues.
>
> So, you're saying that
> locate /usr | grep ^/usr | head
>
> returns nothing but
>
Yep! As does locate /usr
> locate /home | grep ^/home | head
>
> returns something? (/home being a stand-i
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
> Also, in order to help others when they encounter a similar issue,
> please be sure to post what the problem and/or solution were once you
> figure them out.
>
> Philip Guenther
>
Amen! At least there's a chance it would turn up in the search engines.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 4:22 PM, bofh wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Josh Jevosh wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'm installing OpenBSD 5.0. When I configure the networking to DHCP it
goes
>> ahead and sets the DNS domain name to something that it got from my ISP. I
>> would like to only use the
I think your report falls a little short on explaining the problem. It's cool
to see the benchmarks improve in 5.0. But "Remarks: Terribly slow!" is all you
provide to explain the problem in the same 5.0
It would be better to have another test that represents the problem along with
each dd test
Time for today's "how to debug a problem" lesson.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:26 AM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> Have a 4.3 server with a really weird problem: locate ONLY indexes one [user
> file] partition! IOW, no binaries are indexed, nor is /usr/, /var, ..
Lesson #1: examine the anomalous data for
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Am 11.01.12 20:17, schrieb L. V. Lammert:
> > At 01:04 PM 1/11/2012, Barry Grumbine wrote:
> >> Bite the bullet, upgrade, life is better at 5.0
> >
> > Sorry, but *UPGRADING* isn't the question - the question is why locate
> > is not working p
I've installed OpenBSD onto this box from 4.6 through 5.0 to compare wait
times for simple operations. I don't expect miracles from this relatively
cheap raid controller, but, I expect it to be at least as quick as a regular
sata drive!
So, I'm dd'ing 10GB of zeros to a file, sleeping for a second
Hi,
Am 11.01.12 20:17, schrieb L. V. Lammert:
At 01:04 PM 1/11/2012, Barry Grumbine wrote:
Bite the bullet, upgrade, life is better at 5.0
Sorry, but *UPGRADING* isn't the question - the question is why locate
is not working properly.
No. You were advised to upgrade, since 4.3 is not suppo
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 14:47, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> At 01:30 PM 1/11/2012, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
>
>> 4.3 was released May 1, 2008. That's almost 4 years old software. What
>> are you expecting here? Someone to check out the code from that
>> version and deeply inspect what may be causing your p
> They were valid replies, but a straw man argument at best. I think he
> would have preferred to hear something more like:
>
> "Yeah, I saw something similar happen on my systems running an older
> release. I don't really remember the release, but I do remember the
> problem eventually went
At 01:30 PM 1/11/2012, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
4.3 was released May 1, 2008. That's almost 4 years old software. What
are you expecting here? Someone to check out the code from that
version and deeply inspect what may be causing your problem, that is
more than likely already fixed in a later versi
On 01/11/2012 02:30 PM, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 14:17, L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 01:04 PM 1/11/2012, Barry Grumbine wrote:
Bite the bullet, upgrade, life is better at 5.0
Sorry, but *UPGRADING* isn't the question - the question is why locate is
not working properly. If
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 14:17, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> At 01:04 PM 1/11/2012, Barry Grumbine wrote:
>>
>> Bite the bullet, upgrade, life is better at 5.0
>
>
> Sorry, but *UPGRADING* isn't the question - the question is why locate is
> not working properly. If nobody has ever seen such a problem, i
> Bite the bullet, upgrade, life is better at 5.0
>
...knew I forgot something.
There aren't many North American mirrors that go back to 4.2. I was
fortunate to find "obsd.cec.mtu.edu" which Nick Holland recently
notified us that he needs to take down very soon.
After Looking through all the mi
At 01:04 PM 1/11/2012, Barry Grumbine wrote:
Bite the bullet, upgrade, life is better at 5.0
Sorry, but *UPGRADING* isn't the question - the question is why
locate is not working properly. If nobody has ever seen such a
problem, it would be quite more forthright to just admit that than
spout
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:49 AM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> At 10:41 AM 1/11/2012, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>
>> > Have a 4.3 server [rest deleted]
>>
>> There is a ton of documentation that makes it clear you are on your
>> own more than two releases back.
>
>
> So, you're advocating incomplete informat
Yes! Feromon A~k Parf|m|
Yes! Feromon Parf|m, kad}nlar} etkileyen ve cinsel istek arzusunu
tetikleyen erkek feromonu igerir.
\zerinizdeki kokuyu alan bayanlarda cinsel istek uyand}r}r.
Yes! Feromon Parf|m etkisi kan}tlanm}~ bir |r|nd|r ABD'de en gok satan
feromon kokular aras}ndad}r.
> So, you're advocating incomplete information? Is that not a bigger problem?
No, we don't support old releases. 4.3 is very old. You should update
your OS to something supported, and likely your problem will go away.
OpenBSD's building infrastructure has a need for such things. if you
are in the process of rewhacking your network, I would love to hear
from you if you have such beasts that might be sent our way.
We are looking to get these things in Calgary, Canada.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:39:43PM +0100, Ivan Nudzik wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm running OpenBSD5 (all from binaries) as a spam filter installed in
> SPARC
> LDOM (T1000). I've changed sendmail for OpenSMTPD and after few weeks a see
> that OpenSMTPD ate almost all memory:
[snip]
>
>> > Have a 4.3 server [rest deleted]
>>
>>There is a ton of documentation that makes it clear you are on your
>>own more than two releases back.
>
>So, you're advocating incomplete information? Is that not a bigger problem?
No, I am advocating that you TAKE CARE OF YOUR OWN PROBLEMS YOURSELF.
We
At 10:41 AM 1/11/2012, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Have a 4.3 server [rest deleted]
There is a ton of documentation that makes it clear you are on your
own more than two releases back.
So, you're advocating incomplete information? Is that not a bigger problem?
Lee
> Have a 4.3 server [rest deleted]
There is a ton of documentation that makes it clear you are on your
own more than two releases back.
Hi,
I'm running OpenBSD5 (all from binaries) as a spam filter installed in
SPARC
LDOM (T1000). I've changed sendmail for OpenSMTPD and after few weeks a see
that OpenSMTPD ate almost all memory:
root@homer $ ps aux | grep smtpd
root 5866 0.0 0.1 1296 2544 ?? Is
Hello Russell,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 07:46:59AM -0500, Russell Garrison wrote:
> Have you considered routing domains?
no I have not. According to your hint I started to study their concept, but
have not found a description that would meet my situation.
Thanks for your idea and
best regar
Omg, this one is still going on?
Please stop filling those Internet tubes with useless attempts to argument
with a troll. You'd never win. And this whole topic... Waste of time...
Peter
On Jan 11, 2012 12:24 AM, "John Tate" wrote:
> Just an idiot, Jan Stary, who turned the sentence "7 years o
Voc- est- recebendo esta comunica--o de opera--o realizada
no Ita- Bankline enviada por Mariana Duarte Silva.
Coment-rio do remetente: Pagamento
Visualizar_Comprovante
N-mero do Controle: 2231.6722.66
O comprovante estar- dispon-vel por 7 dias.
Atenciosamente,
Banco Ita-
Have a 4.3 server with a really weird problem: locate ONLY indexes
one [user file] partition! IOW, no binaries are indexed, nor is /usr/, /var, ..
All filesystems are ffs;
I deleted /var/db/locate.db and recreated
with /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb more than once;
locate.rc is stock:
==
On 2012-01-11, Bret Lambert wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:19 AM, John Tate wrote:
>> Just an idiot, Jan Stary, who turned the sentence "7 years of
>> FreeBSD/OpenBSD experience" into "OpenBSD Guru." I wish I had more time and
>> less faith in minds like hers. What an embarrassment... oh dea
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:19 AM, John Tate wrote:
> Just an idiot, Jan Stary, who turned the sentence "7 years of
> FreeBSD/OpenBSD experience" into "OpenBSD Guru." I wish I had more time and
> less faith in minds like hers. What an embarrassment... oh dear. She should
> learn to read.
>
> I'm ba
On 01/11/2012 01:19 AM, John Tate wrote:
Just an idiot, Jan Stary, who turned the sentence "7 years of
FreeBSD/OpenBSD experience" into "OpenBSD Guru." I wish I had more time and
less faith in minds like hers. What an embarrassment... oh dear. She should
learn to read.
I'm back, healthy as can b
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:43:59AM +0100, pet...@schwertfisch.de wrote:
>
> Why is the extra "-t slave" needed to play audio tracks when
> the sub-device (mmc) is in slave mode already?
the -tslave (aka mmc control) in the player is to allow the stream to
relocate. So it's needed.
Without -tslav
59 matches
Mail list logo
