Le 18-10-2013 6:18, YASUOKA Masahiko a écrit :
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 21:10:25 +0200
Gruel Bruno b.gr...@sdnet.info wrote:
As i thought that it's doesn't read my users file i changed the
username password but nothing else.
Yes, the log shows the session is terminated because the passwords
* Johan Beisser j...@caustic.org [2013-10-16 21:09]:
Right. I guess if I want to define multiple queues for matching
traffic, I need to either redo the filter rules to use tagging*, or
simply do it per outbound bit of traffic.
let's make that outright clear: defining queues is for bandwidth
* Boris Goldberg bo...@twopoint.com [2013-10-17 15:59]:
You probably need to mention that the new queuing is using hfsc model and
what hfsc model is.
I don't think anyone should have to care what algorithm is being used
under the hood.
I extensively use cbq and very confused by the
On 2013-10-18, Gabriel Guzman g...@guzman-nunez.com wrote:
+h3Does my package need a readme?/h3
+A package may require special instructions to run on OpenBSD, or
+additional files may need to be downloaded before the port will work
+properly, or your port may rely on additional packages to
Just a thought: now that fuse support is enabled what about ntfs-3g?
Il 17/ott/2013 23:36 David Vasek va...@fido.cz ha scritto:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013, Joel Sing wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Manuel Giraud wrote:
Hi,
I have a ntfs partition with rather large (about 3GB) files on it. When
I
On 2013-10-18, Scott McEachern sc...@blackstaff.ca wrote:
Circumstances change, and I might be able to redeploy those HDDs as a
RAID5 array. This, at least in theory, would allow the 18TB total to be
realized as 15TB as RAID5, gaining me 6TB.
even if softraid would rebuild raid5, I'd worry
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Paolo Aglialoro paol...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a thought: now that fuse support is enabled what about ntfs-3g?
ntfs-3g is in ports (sysutils/ntfs-3g).
It's fuse support that, as of now, it's not enabled.
Ciao,
David
On 10/18/13 07:31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013-10-18, Scott McEachern sc...@blackstaff.ca wrote:
Circumstances change, and I might be able to redeploy those HDDs as a
RAID5 array. This, at least in theory, would allow the 18TB total to be
realized as 15TB as RAID5, gaining me 6TB.
even if
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:28:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013-10-18, Gabriel Guzman g...@guzman-nunez.com wrote:
+h3Does my package need a readme?/h3
+A package may require special instructions to run on OpenBSD, or
+additional files may need to be downloaded before the port
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, David Vasek wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013, Joel Sing wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Manuel Giraud wrote:
Hi,
I have a ntfs partition with rather large (about 3GB) files on it. When
I copy these files on a ffs partition they are corrupted. When I try to
checksum them directly
I've got two OpenBSD boxes acting as my border router[s], talking BGP to
a small # (~4) of peers.
At the moment, I've got them using carp(4) on every interface, and
bgpd.conf has for each neighbor{} stanza, a depend on carpX line.
This works, more or less, but failover is anything but
Hello,
I recently brought a pci usb gigabit ethernet with chipset AX88179 and
update the source to 5.4. After the making the 5.4 new kernel, I found out
that I still can't use the usb gigabit enternet. Is there anyone using the
usb gigabit ethernet under 5.4 ? Any idea to solve the problem ?
There is a driver in development in -current that is not yet
enabled, axen(4). It is not part of 5.4.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:29:27PM +0800, man Chan wrote:
Hello,
I recently brought a pci usb gigabit ethernet with chipset AX88179 and
update the source to 5.4.? After the making the 5.4
Hello guys,
Since 4.9, there is a auto-scaling tcp buffer size, good functionnality
but i've a question. I'm using a pair of OpenBSD servers as squid
proxies. Our internet bandwidth is 1Gb/s so we are able to download @ 90
Mbytes /s if needed.
When I was using OpenBSD 4.8, i was tuning
On Friday, October 18, 2013 16:53 CEST, Frederic URBAN
frederic.ur...@ircad.fr wrote:
Hello guys,
Since 4.9, there is a auto-scaling tcp buffer size, good functionnality
but i've a question. I'm using a pair of OpenBSD servers as squid
proxies. Our internet bandwidth is 1Gb/s so we are
Hello Henning,
Friday, October 18, 2013, 5:37:23 AM, you wrote:
I extensively use cbq and very confused by the current queuing manual. It
seems that actual speed will be somewhere between min and max (and wont
be equal to bandwidth), but how to get an idea where?
HB bandwidth is the target
I think he did answer your question, if you read between the lines.. A session
cannot be 'pushed' to max! It needs to demand the bandwidth in the first place.
Try reading this; http://trash.net/~kaber/hfsc/SIGCOM97.pdf
This along side /many/ other Internet pages allowed us to fully implement
On 10/11/13 15:38, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:04:16AM -0400, Jiri B wrote:
Try `su' to your user on that system and try to `ls -lR' those dirs,
I suppose he won't be able to do that.
j.
Thanks Jiri.
Indeed he can't.
I've looked at this closer and I found out that on
Hi there,
having a personal dislike of Facebook (and the MeeToo-systems alike)
for their impertinent sniffing for private data I tried on my laptop to
block facebook.com via hosts-file. Interestingly this failed: Calling
http://www.facebook.com; always resulted in a lookup for
Regards,
The way it gets blocked (but not all for a wise kid) properly is via CDIR and
block DNS via OpenDNS services
Greetings.
2013/10/18 Stefan Wollny stefan.wol...@web.de
Hi there,
having a personal dislike of Facebook (and the MeeToo-systems alike)
for their impertinent sniffing for
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi there,
having a personal dislike of Facebook (and the MeeToo-systems alike)
for their impertinent sniffing for private data I tried on my laptop to
block facebook.com via hosts-file. Interestingly this failed: Calling
http://www.facebook.com;
On 19 October 2013 00:27, Stefan Wollny stefan.wol...@web.de wrote:
Hi there,
having a personal dislike of Facebook (and the MeeToo-systems alike)
for their impertinent sniffing for private data I tried on my laptop to
block facebook.com via hosts-file. Interestingly this failed: Calling
Hi Andres,
yes - I have read about OpenDNS' services and that many out there are
really happy with them.
But I try to do my homework first before relying on s.o.
else: I _do_ have this OpenBSD-based squid-server - why not use it to
it's full potential? Might not be a big deal traffic-wise, but
On 10/18/13 18:27, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi there,
having a personal dislike of Facebook (and the MeeToo-systems alike)
for their impertinent sniffing for private data I tried on my laptop to
block facebook.com via hosts-file. Interestingly this failed: Calling
http://www.facebook.com;
Am Fri, 18 Oct 2013 19:21:44 -0400
schrieb Brian McCafferty br...@mccafferty.ca:
[ ... ]
If you use dhclient on your laptop, I think you need to make sure to
specify lookup file bind (the search order) to have the hosts file
checked before DNS server. ie- in resolv.conf.tail
bind file is the
Am Fri, 18 Oct 2013 19:33:11 -0400
schrieb mia kmiy...@comcast.net:
[ ... ]
If you're handling DHCP for all of the traffic for your site, why not
just set up a dns server, point your dhcp clients to this DNS server
and create an authoritative zone for facebook.com that points to
somewhere
Am Sat, 19 Oct 2013 01:02:58 +0200
schrieb Marios Makassikis mmakassi...@gmail.com:
Hi Marios!
[ ... ]
Anyway: I think I finally managed to block all their IPs via PF and
on this laptop I now feel a little less 'observed'. [Yes, I know -
this is just today's snapshot of IPs!]
Did
On 10/18/13 18:27, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi there,
having a personal dislike of Facebook (and the MeeToo-systems alike)
for their impertinent sniffing for private data I tried on my laptop to
block facebook.com via hosts-file. Interestingly this failed: Calling
http://www.facebook.com; always
Am Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:02:55 -0500 (CDT)
schrieb Eric Johnson eri...@mathlab.gruver.net:
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi there,
having a personal dislike of Facebook (and the MeeToo-systems alike)
for their impertinent sniffing for private data I tried on my
laptop to
mia wrote, On 10/18/13 16:33:
If you're handling DHCP for all of the traffic for your site, why not
just set up a dns server, point your dhcp clients to this DNS server
and create an authoritative zone for facebook.com that points to
somewhere other than facebook?
Running your own own DNS
On 10/19/2013 at 12:27 AM Stefan Wollny wrote:
|Hi there,
|[snip]
|
|My question is on the squid-server I have running at home: What
|would make more sense - blocking facebook.com via pf.conf alike
or are
|there reasons to use squid's ACL instead? Performance? Being
|ultra-paranoid and
i'd imagine that putting 'www.facebook.com' in your hosts file will do it,
unless the browser ignores /etc/hosts
you could always use the url filtering mechanism of relayd combined
with pf redirects, but if people really want to bypass it, they'll
do proxyies (via ssh even) or remote desktop or
Darren Spruell [phatbuck...@gmail.com] wrote:
I don't have a great deal of experience with SSD disks but was spec'ing
some systems to use them. We'd be doing RAID on the hosts and I'd prefer
to have something supported by bio(4) for volume management. Do SSDs
have any impact on ability to do
List, I'm bringing you into the middle of an off-list conversation where
I'm setting up a RAID10 array. Well, I'm using two RAID1 arrays as the
drives for a RAID0 array.
All relevant information follows. Any clue to why I'm ending up with an
array 1/4 the size I'm expecting?
On 10/18/13
34 matches
Mail list logo
