Erling Westenvik [erling.westen...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> The unit costs are pretty stiff for most of the gadgets but some of
> them appear to be free. Anyway: When can we expect OpenBSD support for
> these devices?
>
> http://www.spiegel.de/static/happ/netzwelt/2014/na/v1/pub/img/Mobilfunk/S3224_G
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
>>Just to bring this issue back to the forefront.
>>
>> In light of shrinking funding, we do need to look for a source to
>> cover project expenses. If need be the OpenBSD Foundation can
On 2014-01-14, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to create an IP unnumbered setup with PPPoE on OpenBSD?
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Martijn Rijkeboer
>
>
Untested but I think you should be able to put an address from your lan
interface on the pppoe interface which might do what you w
Perhaps it's time to slightly increase the cost of CD purchases. I know
it's not a favorite thing to do, but necessary for sustainability.
On 01/14/2014 07:30 PM, Jason Koch wrote:
No need to respond to this: just ideas if they're not already covered. I've
just made my donation.
For what it's
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:56:14PM -0600, Kent R. Spillner wrote:
> Anyways, talk is cheap so I'm going to go make a donation now. If everyone
> reading this did the same this thread could die, and OpenBSD wouldn't.
+1
$10 monthly recurring donation
Predrag
Nicolai, and others,
I'd like to take the opportunity to thank all of those stepping up
to the call for contributions. Every little bit helps.
For those who ask, the OpenBSD Foundation is the best path for
contributions.
I hope some larger contributors will step up, to take a more long term
vie
>> --- Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> Anyone want to suggest we hold a bake sale?
>
> I understand there is a market for brownies in Colorado and Washington state.
>
> Ken Hendrickson
>
>
Not if you are a Fed!!
Jay
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:56:14PM -0600, Kent R. Spillner wrote:
> Anyways, talk is cheap so I'm going to go make a donation now. If everyone
> reading this did the same this thread could die, and OpenBSD wouldn't.
I just did the same, $100 via the OpenBSD Foundation. Feels good. I'm
super ex
No need to respond to this: just ideas if they're not already covered. I've
just made my donation.
For what it's worth - you can see the numbers on wikimedia's donations,
from 2009. I wouldn't discount the $10 user base.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Staeiou/Protocol [see the graphs on
fundr
>previously on this list Theo contributed:
>
>> The OpenBSD project uses a lot of electricity for running the
>> development and build machines. A number of logistical reasons
>> prevents us from moving the machines to another location which might
>> offer space/power for free, so let's not allow
Em 14-01-2014 19:24, Martijn Rijkeboer escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to create an IP unnumbered setup with PPPoE on OpenBSD?
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Martijn Rijkeboer
>
And what the heck you mean by "unnumbered"? If it is wildcard address,
and by it, that the pppoe access concentrator provides
For additional financial source, may I suggest that the project license
some of their artworks? I think this has been asked for so many times
before, maybe you should reconsider your stand on this. Of course Theo or
the OpenBSD project as a whole, or the OBSD Foundation can define which
artwork is
previously on this list Theo contributed:
> The OpenBSD project uses a lot of electricity for running the
> development and build machines. A number of logistical reasons
> prevents us from moving the machines to another location which might
> offer space/power for free, so let's not allow the co
Hi all,
I'm using OpenBSD 5.3 to provide an Alix-based home firewall. Thank
you all for the commitment to elegant, well-documented software which
isn't pernicious to the mental health of its users.
I've a question about the new checksum changes[0], being interested
in such things and having lis
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 03:24:00PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I will take this opportunity to suggest a probably bad idea but one
> > that crossed my mind nonetheless.
> >
> > I have not actively kept up with this list so forgive me if this can't
> > be done, or isn't in line with the communi
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 16:12, Erik Mitchell wrote:
> I have not actively kept up with this list so forgive me if this can't
> be done, or isn't in line with the community's values, but what about
> doing a Kickstarter campaign for each OpenBSD release? Varying levels
> of support could get the di
There's a lot of reasons why I want to avoid this conversation, but since
it's started, I'd say look at http://www.patreon.com/ for a crowdfunding
model - much nicer than Kickstarters. (and a way to get people to
formalize their buying of CD sets every release)
> > Anyone want to suggest we hold a bake sale?
>
> I will take this opportunity to suggest a probably bad idea but one
> that crossed my mind nonetheless.
>
> I have not actively kept up with this list so forgive me if this can't
> be done, or isn't in line with the community's values, but what
> Anyone want to suggest we hold a bake sale?
I will take this opportunity to suggest a probably bad idea but one
that crossed my mind nonetheless.
I have not actively kept up with this list so forgive me if this can't
be done, or isn't in line with the community's values, but what about
doing a
On 1/14/14, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Bob Beck
>> wrote:
>> >Just to bring this issue back to the forefront.
>> >
>> > In light of shrinking funding, we do need to look for a source to
>> > cover project expenses. If need be the OpenBSD Foundation can be
>> > i
Kiril, a dedicated one purpose bank account or officially directed
donations are somewhat problematic to a canadian not for profit -
Normally for expenses the foundation supports we simply re-imburse the
individuals for their costs from our funds.
As far as the suggested "donation" meter that's an
Hi,
Is it possible to create an IP unnumbered setup with PPPoE on OpenBSD?
Kind regards,
Martijn Rijkeboer
Hello!
Running 5.4-RELEASE/macppc on a Mac PowerBook G4, attempting to
interact with the built-in bwi(4) card results in badness. I have
installed bwi-firmware-1.4p2 from ports; the card is detected, but
attempting to run "ifconfig bwi0 scan" or "ifconfig bwi0 up" results
in the error message in
On Wed, January 15, 2014 00:03, Bob Beck wrote:
>Just to bring this issue back to the forefront.
>
> In light of shrinking funding, we do need to look for a source to
> cover project expenses. If need be the OpenBSD Foundation can be
> involved in receiving donations to cover project electrica
--- Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Anyone want to suggest we hold a bake sale?
I understand there is a market for brownies in Colorado and Washington state.
Ken Hendrickson
> Yes, we remove about 10 of the architectures. We'd slowly lose the
> developers who like to work on those areas. They also work in other
> areas, but ... I suspect they would another BSD that supports them.
Darn' tootin'!
> Anyone want to suggest we hold a bake sale?
Make that a lo-carb bake
How about we hold a bake sale?
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Bob Beck
> wrote:
> > >Just to bring this issue back to the forefront.
> > >
> > > In light of shrinking funding, we do need to look for a source to
> > > cover project
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
> >Just to bring this issue back to the forefront.
> >
> > In light of shrinking funding, we do need to look for a source to
> > cover project expenses. If need be the OpenBSD Foundation can be
> > involved in receiving donations to cover pro
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
>Just to bring this issue back to the forefront.
>
> In light of shrinking funding, we do need to look for a source to
> cover project expenses. If need be the OpenBSD Foundation can be
> involved in receiving donations to cover project electri
Not so long ago, the cwd functionality was removed from tmux.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=138270549910047&w=2
With the current i386 snapshot, tmux behaves as follows:
Opening a new window with prefix-c in xterm
creates a new window and starts a shell in $HOME
Opening a new window with pre
And actually, if you're reading this, you can help by passing this on
to people you know *off these lists*.
When we post to these mailing lists saying these things we are asking
for your help to get the word out to
people who support open source projects. Those people are not
necessarily here, and
Just to bring this issue back to the forefront.
In light of shrinking funding, we do need to look for a source to
cover project expenses. If need be the OpenBSD Foundation can be
involved in receiving donations to cover project electrical costs.
But the fact is right now, OpenBSD will shut do
previously on this list Артур Истомин contributed:
> > > I think pop3 is dead but recently there was a mail in tech@
> > > stating Sunil Nimmagadda develops pop3 daemon closed to
> > > OpenBSD standards.
> >
> > That's a good point. I don't like leaving mails on the server for more than
> > a
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a PPPoE connection to my ISP (solcon.nl). I've read
pppoe(4) and pppoe(8) and got the following configuration:
cat /etc/hostname.pppoe0
inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \
pppoedev em2 authproto pap \
authname '@solcon.net' authkey '' up
dest 0.0.0.1
Em 14-01-2014 06:49, Renaud Allard escreveu:
>
> To be fair, virtualizing stuff without a common shared storage is a
> little bit useless. The biggest power of virtualization is to be able
> to move VMs between physical hosts or even powering on physical hosts
> when you need more power.
>
> But se
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:10:09PM -0500, John Smith wrote:
> > I think pop3 is dead but recently there was a mail in tech@
> > stating Sunil Nimmagadda develops pop3 daemon closed to
> > OpenBSD standards.
>
> That's a good point. I don't like leaving mails on the server for more than a
> day or
OBSOLETE WHEN UA.CA IMPLEMENTS NEW SPAMLOGD
Because traplist.gz sometimes expires hosts that are still sending spam to
the world, I'd like to keep these addresses tarpitted for a while after
they are removed, say 24 hours. This logic doesn't apply to the nixspam
list because it contains addresses
Hi,
following Stuart's suggestion to use libbind, I recompiled and linked
Pantomime.
I added:
ADDITIONAL_LDFLAGS += -lbind
ADDITIONAL_LDFLAGS += -Wl,-L/usr/local/lib/libbind
-Wl,-R/usr/local/lib/libbind
ADDITIONAL_INCLUDE_DIRS += -I/usr/local/include/bind
I confirm that the additional inclu
accept
--
--
Josef Weissacher
weissacher.jo...@gmail.com
--
unsubscribe misc@openbsd.org
On 01/14/2014 05:49 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 14-01-2014 01:11, Christopher Ahrens escreveu:
What I meant by bare-metal was if I should run a bunch of services on
the same installation of OpenBSD.
I've run in the same physical space issue with my company servers and
didn't think twic
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:36:03AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014-01-12, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> You must use libbind's headers, too: -I/usr/local/include/libbind
>
> It would probably make sense to apply the diff suggested in that thread
> though, as it fixes this case and I don't s
42 matches
Mail list logo
