* Chris Smith [2014-03-17 23:41]:
> I think the source of this reported problem has been found, and
> happily fixed (the preliminary results are promising).
>
> Basically I needed to find some way to get the backups to complete
> reliably so I started a 20 count ping job a minute before the rsync
* Stuart Henderson [2014-01-27 13:18]:
> On 2014/01/26 14:53, Chris Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Stuart Henderson
> > wrote:
> > > This could be an MTU or RWIN-related issue.
> >
> > Could my issue have anything to with the "miscounting bug for inbound
> > with pf on" menti
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> you stated that my description was wrong and not what you were
> looking for on at least one point of behavior.
If by that, you mean this:
>>If no data is received, it should still return after 0.1s.
> No, read() should not return 10
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014, at 10:35 PM, Jim Rowan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to resurrect some neoware ca22 thinclient boxes, and seeing
> strange behavior I don't know how to interpret.
[...]
> Suspicious that it was the usb drive itself, I tried three separate
> brands. Same thing.
> I put grml
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:14 PM, trifle menot wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
>>> Show me where POSIX says VTIME must be an interbyte timer.
>>
>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap11.html#tag_11_01_07
>
> I missed that during my sea
Hi,
I'm trying to resurrect some neoware ca22 thinclient boxes, and seeing
strange behavior I don't know how to interpret.
I have a bootable 5.4 usb stick. If I put that in the box, right
after the initial bios boot screen (after it says "via c7 1.0Ghz"),
the system resets. This is bef
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> Show me where POSIX says VTIME must be an interbyte timer.
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap11.html#tag_11_01_07
I missed that during my search. POSIX says so. OK.
> And you *still* haven't provided a
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:52 PM, trifle menot wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
>> Your question is "why haven't OS developers done what I think is
>> right?"
>> The answer to that question is "because the POSIX standard says we
>> shouldn't, and is quite clear abo
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> your cute little nickname should have hinted that you don't have a
> mature understanding of the world.
Thanks for the psychoanalysis, doctor. Is your advice free, or do you
charge for it?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> Your question is "why haven't OS developers done what I think is
> right?"
> The answer to that question is "because the POSIX standard says we
> shouldn't, and is quite clear about this."
Show me where POSIX says VTIME must be an interbyt
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:13 PM, trifle menot wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> I *sounds* like the problem you're trying to solve** is some thing like
>> I want to efficiently read data from a serial line, returning
>> whenever at least
>> 250 bytes ar
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:58:15AM +0100, Manuel Giraud wrote:
> I can then connect as root (with the correct authorized_keys) and bioctl
> the crypto softraid and finally kill this sshd.
>
> Drawbacks:
> - compile a self-content sshd (see crunchgen(8) for this) (if
> possible do
> > I suspect they all follow an official specification. Careful test code
> > compared to the specification would decide.
>
> > It might show them all to be right, leaving the obvious conclusion about
> > who is wrong.
>
> To test it, I used two Perl scripts, sender and receiver, a two port
> s
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I suspect they all follow an official specification. Careful test code
> compared to the specification would decide.
> It might show them all to be right, leaving the obvious conclusion about
> who is wrong.
To test it, I used two Perl scr
>On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
>> Are you saying OpenBSD does it wrong, or that all the operating systems
>> do it wrong?
>
>I tested Linux and OpenBSD. Both wrong.
>
>The termios man pages from NetBSD and FreeBSD are identical to
>OpenBSD. So I expect they're wrong too.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Are you saying OpenBSD does it wrong, or that all the operating systems
> do it wrong?
I tested Linux and OpenBSD. Both wrong.
The termios man pages from NetBSD and FreeBSD are identical to
OpenBSD. So I expect they're wrong too.
> > I *sounds* like the problem you're trying to solve** is some thing like
> > I want to efficiently read data from a serial line, returning
> > whenever at least
> > 250 bytes are available or when more then 0.1s has passed.
> > If no data is received, it should still return after
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> I *sounds* like the problem you're trying to solve** is some thing like
> I want to efficiently read data from a serial line, returning
> whenever at least
> 250 bytes are available or when more then 0.1s has passed.
> If no
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> In the future, please submit concise reports rather than a link to
> something vague which is part of a long conversation on some site out
> there. It will indicate you are serious.
I may do that.
> Perhaps VMIN and VTIME were designed b
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:01 PM, trifle menot wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
>> You haven't convinced me the design needs fixing, nor have you proved
>> that the goal that you (sorta) describe can't already be solved with
>> the existing APIs.
>
>> "What probl
> There is also a GSoC project to get BFD into OpenBSD. So if a student is
> interested in working on that that would be an oportunity.
Honestly, I think many people are building hacks because they lack a
carefully-integrated BFD. If we had it, it would not solve fair-share
problems, but it would
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> You haven't convinced me the design needs fixing, nor have you proved
> that the goal that you (sorta) describe can't already be solved with
> the existing APIs.
> "What problem are you trying to solve?"
a) set VMIN = 250; don't read()
> On stackoverflow I said:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20154157/termios-vmin-vtime-and-blocking-non-blocking-read-operations/22771908#22771908
>
> Any thoughts on fixing the design, in favor or opposed?
In the future, please submit concise reports rather than a link to
something vague
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:57:38PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2014-03-31, marst wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 07:52:52PM -0400, marst wrote:
>>>I set up a shortcut in my cwm config that goes like this:
>>>bind 4-p "/home/marst/bin/screenshot.sh"
>>>
>>>screenshot.sh goes like this:
>>>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:41 PM, trifle menot wrote:
> On stackoverflow I said:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20154157/termios-vmin-vtime-and-blocking-non-blocking-read-operations/22771908#22771908
>
> Any thoughts on fixing the design, in favor or opposed?
You haven't convinced me the d
On 2014-03-31, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> Hi,
> followed faq/current.html,
>
>===> man
> pod2man --official --release="OpenBSD 5.5" --center=OpenSSL --section=3
> --name=ASN1_OBJECT_NEW
> /usr/src/lib/libssl/man/../src/doc/crypto/ASN1_OBJECT_new.pod >
> ASN1_OBJECT_new.3
> Perl API version v5.16
On 2014-03-31, marst wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 07:52:52PM -0400, marst wrote:
>>I set up a shortcut in my cwm config that goes like this:
>>bind 4-p "/home/marst/bin/screenshot.sh"
>>
>>screenshot.sh goes like this:
>>
>>#!/bin/sh
>>scrot -s '%Y-%m-%d_$wx$h.png' # -e 'mv $f ~/documents/shot
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 07:52:52PM -0400, marst wrote:
>I set up a shortcut in my cwm config that goes like this:
>bind 4-p "/home/marst/bin/screenshot.sh"
>
>screenshot.sh goes like this:
>
>#!/bin/sh
>scrot -s '%Y-%m-%d_$wx$h.png' # -e 'mv $f ~/documents/shots' -e 'feh $f'
>
>Ran by itself, the c
On stackoverflow I said:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20154157/termios-vmin-vtime-and-blocking-non-blocking-read-operations/22771908#22771908
Any thoughts on fixing the design, in favor or opposed?
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 01:08:12PM +0200, Thorleif Wiik [BCIX] wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> were running OpenBGPd since a long a time as route servers.
I guess those are configured as route-reflectors. Correct?
> We now want to export certain BGP Communities to all route server peers.
>
> We already se
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 07:59:19PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014/03/31 09:31, Andy wrote:
> > Hi Stuart,
> >
> > Does Henning, Claudio or any of the other developers have any plan to
> > implement BGP equal cost multi-path support (maximum-paths) to OpenBGPd?
>
> No idea about anyone e
If I suspend the laptop it only suspends for a second or two and then it
resumes by itself. Same issue with and without running X
OpenBSD 5.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #42: Sun Mar 30 21:06:10 MDT 2014
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 8474574848 (808
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Imre Oolberg wrote:
...
> But i wonder how i could ask the system how much are the so to say
> ulimits of the running unbound process, e.g. number of open files?
There's currently no way to do that from a non-privileged process and
no canned way to do it from a p
On 2014/03/31 09:31, Andy wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> Does Henning, Claudio or any of the other developers have any plan to
> implement BGP equal cost multi-path support (maximum-paths) to OpenBGPd?
No idea about anyone else's plans...
> I guess it should be quite quick to add as OpenOSPFd already s
On 31/03/14 1:34 PM, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
A few updates for the page: http://www.OpenBSD.org/users.html#isp
* Fix broken Swebase link.
* Add Devio.us
* Add Grex
* Add Polar Home
It looks like Reverse.Net should be removed. Their website makes
it pretty clear they don't run OpenBSD
On 03/30/14 22:47, Maurice Janssen wrote:
Hi,
I have two SunFire V210 machines to offer to any developer (preferably in
Europe) that can use such a machine for OpenBSD development.
Both are dual CPU 1.0 GHz with 2 GB RAM.
Just contact me off list please.
Maurice
I've had a couple replies,
On 31 Mar 2014 at 18:13, Chi wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:34:39 +0100
> skin...@britvault.co.uk (Craig R. Skinner) wrote:
>
> > Reverse.Net uses OpenBSD on AMD hardware to provide shell
> accounts,
> > website hosting, and domain name hosting.
>
> results to
> Access Denied:
> Because of hi
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:34:39 +0100
skin...@britvault.co.uk (Craig R. Skinner) wrote:
> Reverse.Net uses OpenBSD on AMD hardware to provide shell accounts,
> website hosting, and domain name hosting.
results to
-
Hi!
I had trouble with unbound running out of resources, esp. open files
limit and good people pointed me towards /etc/login.conf. It seems that
unbound is much better now after implementing class for it
unbound:\
:datasize-cur=2G:\
:datasize-max=2G:\
:maxproc-max=256:\
A few updates for the page: http://www.OpenBSD.org/users.html#isp
* Fix broken Swebase link.
* Add Devio.us
* Add Grex
* Add Polar Home
Index: www/users.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/users.html,v
retrieving revision 1.132
diff -
Hi,
followed faq/current.html,
===> man
pod2man --official --release="OpenBSD 5.5" --center=OpenSSL --section=3
--name=ASN1_OBJECT_NEW
/usr/src/lib/libssl/man/../src/doc/crypto/ASN1_OBJECT_new.pod >
ASN1_OBJECT_new.3
Perl API version v5.16.0 of Encode does not match v5.18.0 at
/usr/libdata/pe
On 2014-03-29 Sat 19:26 PM |, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >
> > Eventually, will base ftpd be removed?
>
> The program (some might say pogrom) to delete old shit doesn't really
> need any more suggestions at this time.
I'm happily using it & was wondering if I should plan to stop doing so.
On 2014-03-30, marst wrote:
> I set up a shortcut in my cwm config that goes like this:
> bind 4-p "/home/marst/bin/screenshot.sh"
>
> screenshot.sh goes like this:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> scrot -s '%Y-%m-%d_$wx$h.png' # -e 'mv $f ~/documents/shots' -e 'feh $f'
is scrot in the PATH inherited by this scri
Hi Stuart,
Does Henning, Claudio or any of the other developers have any plan to
implement BGP equal cost multi-path support (maximum-paths) to OpenBGPd?
I guess it should be quite quick to add as OpenOSPFd already supports
this and the kernel FIB is ready.
Actually quite surprised this isn
marst said:
> bind 4-p "/home/marst/bin/screenshot.sh"
Why do you need shellscript for one-liner?
> scrot -s '%Y-%m-%d_$wx$h.png' # -e 'mv $f ~/documents/shots' -e 'feh $f'
If you uncomment the rest of the command, it won't do what you wanted it
to do. Use something like this instead:
bind 4-p
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 03:15:43AM -0400, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 05:15:36PM -0400, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
> > $ grep -rF w...@openbsd.org www | wc -l
> > 2558
> >
> > Perhaps those should be changed then?
> >
> > I'd send a patch, but I think it'd be sill
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 05:15:36PM -0400, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
> $ grep -rF w...@openbsd.org www | wc -l
> 2558
>
> Perhaps those should be changed then?
>
> I'd send a patch, but I think it'd be silly since it'd just be
> a mechanical change, and a pretty huge diff.
I was informed o
47 matches
Mail list logo
