On 2014-04-27, Edwin Amsler edwin...@gmail.com wrote:
Good call. That would work around this current problem nicely. Though, I
don’t know if this problem is with this specific core, or Cyrix chips in
general.
I won’t be too worried about the whole exercise. I was going to use it for a
Hi Ingo,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de wrote:
I'm working on 5.2 version.
That's unsupported for nearly a year now.
Consider upgrading to 5.5 after May 1.
I know, but I'll never know what ancient versions my users will use, so I'm
using a (reasonably) old
Hi Michal,
Michal Lesiak wrote on Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:01:54PM +0200:
I know, but I'll never know what ancient versions my users will use,
so I'm using a (reasonably) old version to build the package and
compile stuff to retain some backwards-compatibility.
That's not a good plan at all.
Hi Ingo,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de wrote:
That's not a good plan at all. Sometimes, new binaries work on
old versions and vice versa, but in general, that's not the case.
So if you ship packages for 5.2-stable (well, actually, 5.2-obsolete),
you force
Ok, got it. My understanding was that binaries complied on older systems have a
better chance of running correctly on newer systems than the other way around.
Huh? You've understood incorrectly. Each release of OpenBSD is ABI
incompatible
with the previous, or next. We make no promises about
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 09:27:50 -0700, Yassen Damyanov wrote:
Pardon me, just saw that it says 1.0.0f, not 1.0.1f.
Fear makes the wolf look bigger!
Y.
There are other things to worry about if you are running 5.1, what about
that use-after-free race condition openssl has that is patched in
Hi Theo,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Huh? You've understood incorrectly. Each release of OpenBSD is ABI
incompatible
with the previous, or next. We make no promises about ABI. Making such
promises
would be incompatible with making
Folks,
I'm trying to configure the amd service in order to auto-mount a NFS
directory. I noticed that adding the following line in
/etc/rc.conf.local:
amd_flags=-a /tmp/amd_mnt -l syslog -x all /nfs nfs.map
the service fails to start, not being probably able to apply the
specified options to
On Sun, April 27, 2014 22:32, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
Folks,
I'm trying to configure the amd service in order to auto-mount a NFS
directory. I noticed that adding the following line in
/etc/rc.conf.local:
amd_flags=-a /tmp/amd_mnt -l syslog -x all /nfs nfs.map
the service fails to
On Sun 27/04, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
On Sun, April 27, 2014 22:32, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
Hi.
This is mentioned in /etc/rc.conf:
amd_flags=NO# for normal use: and see amd_master below
Hi Kirill,
Thanks for your feedback. 5.4-Rel here, and:
just22@poseidon:[~] egrep
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Yassen Damyanov yassen_...@yahoo.comwrote:
Hello list,
I worry about my 5.1 servers being at risk due to the heartbleed bug, as
they report openssl 1.0.1f which is known to be vulnerable:
Funny to see people being scared about security issue of particular
On 2014-04-27, Michał Lesiak mic...@10bees.com wrote:
Hi Ingo,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de wrote:
That's not a good plan at all. Sometimes, new binaries work on
old versions and vice versa, but in general, that's not the case.
So if you ship packages
The constant MFSNAMELEN as defined in:
lib/libc/sys/getfsstat.2:#define MFSNAMELEN 16
lib/libc/sys/statfs.2:#define MFSNAMELEN 16
sys/sys/mount.h: #define MFSNAMELEN 16
defines the fs type name and, according to comments, it includes nul
terminating character.
The following code
Ping.
Can anyone confirm or deny whether or not the newer Thinkpad
tablets' styluses work as an input device? I see that there is a
usbtablet(4) driver in xenocara, with people reporting success
using external tablets, so it would probably be a matter of
whether or not the newer Thinkpads still
On April 27, 2014 6:46:31 PM CDT, Bryan Linton b...@shoshoni.info wrote:
Ping.
Can anyone confirm or deny whether or not the newer Thinkpad
tablets' styluses work as an input device? I see that there is a
usbtablet(4) driver in xenocara, with people reporting success
using external tablets, so
Is OpenBSD capable of booting from pure UEFI yet? This basically translates to
Is there a UEFI capable bootloader since I don't have secure boot or anything
turned on. I'm rather happy not having to deal with the bios at the moment so
having to turn legacy boot back on would be really annoying.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Tekk t...@parlementum.net wrote:
Is OpenBSD capable of booting from pure UEFI yet? This basically
translates to Is there a UEFI capable bootloader since I don't have
secure boot or anything turned on. I'm rather happy not having to deal with
the bios at the
17 matches
Mail list logo
