On 05/15/17 19:18, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi Edgar,
Edgar Pettijohn wrote on Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:57:57PM -0500:
I think this may be normal, but I can't seem to find it documented anywhere.
While viewing a man page in xterm if I hit the 'v' key it appears to open it
for editing in vi. I
Hi Edgar,
Edgar Pettijohn wrote on Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:57:57PM -0500:
> I think this may be normal, but I can't seem to find it documented anywhere.
> While viewing a man page in xterm if I hit the 'v' key it appears to open it
> for editing in vi. I did so accidentally recently and at first
On 2017-05-15 18.57.57 -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> I think this may be normal, but I can't seem to find it documented anywhere.
> While viewing a man page in xterm if I hit the 'v' key it appears to open it
> for editing in vi. I did so accidentally recently and at first I thought I
> broke
I think this may be normal, but I can't seem to find it documented
anywhere. While viewing a man page in xterm if I hit the 'v' key it
appears to open it for editing in vi. I did so accidentally recently and
at first I thought I broke something because of all the
"F^HFI^HIL^HLE^,etc" which I
On 2017-05-15, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Offlist someone recommended I install the QEMU pckage. I'm trying to, but I'm
> getting dependency errors that I can't seem to resolve.
qemu-ga is part of the qemu package, though I haven't heard of it
actually being used on
Offlist someone recommended I install the QEMU pckage. I'm trying to, but I'm
getting dependency errors that I can't seem to resolve.
Can't install cairo-1.14.6p1 because of libraries
|library fontconfig.10.0 not found
| not found anywhere
|library freetype.25.0 not found
| not found
On 2017-05-15, Adam Thompson wrote:
> I still haven't found this answer anywhere...
>
> Does OpenBSD (more specifically, pf(4), I guess) support RFC 6296,
> IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation? Looks like FreeBSD can do it,
> but I can't tell if that's something they
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Kim Blackwood
wrote:
> problem with the abovesetup. However, migrating to OpenBSD on my personal
> laptop and desktopI suspect will give me some problems mounting both
> Samba shares andexternal drives. We could change the file systems
I'm looking for the guest agent for QEMU\KVM in OpenBSD, but I'm not having
great success.
Could someone lend a hand? I'm running 6.0.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
On 2017/05/15 21:23, Ajitabh Pandey wrote:
> Stuart,
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>
> On 2017-05-11, Ajitabh Pandey wrote:
> > I got a similar message when I try to install python, but upong
> >
I still haven't found this answer anywhere...
Does OpenBSD (more specifically, pf(4), I guess) support RFC 6296,
IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation? Looks like FreeBSD can do it,
but I can't tell if that's something they added to their own pf fork, or
if I'm just missing something in
Stuart,
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2017-05-11, Ajitabh Pandey wrote:
> > I got a similar message when I try to install python, but upong
> > investigating I realise that python was already installed - perhaps as
Hi Ron,
Apologies for delayed response. Here are the contents for /etc/installurl
file. I have commented out all entries but one.
$ cat
/etc/installurl
# OpenBSD mirror
https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD
## Germany Mirrors
# Esslinge
#https://mirror.hs-esslingen.de/pub/OpenBSD
# Berlin
On 2017-05-15 Mon 02:50, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> ...
> This system is intentionally simple, to create robustness via simplicity.
>
> I think you are being critical because you think it is amusing.
>
(please not that the subject is still "syspatch ideas")
Syspatch infrastructure itself is
Re-reading your message, I realise I may have misunderstood your
question. My previous advice would only be a good idea if you were
migrating the Samba servers to OpenBSD as well. I am now thinking
that that was not what you were suggesting, so please ignore my
previous comment and apologies.
If I was making the transition you are attempting, I would migrate to
FFS. Then, there would be no trouble regarding read/write ability.
In my experience, FFS is been stable and reliable. If you are
investing in moving to OpenBSD, that would be my recommendation.
On 5/14/17, Kim Blackwood
On 2017-05-15 Mon 08:19, Michal Bozon wrote:
> > > ...
> > ...
> ...
> Reverting the last patchset would be reverting the patches from the last
> patchset file, and removing that file.
>
correction/addition: in the reverse order
>On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 08:36:21AM +, Michal Bozon wrote:
>> I think the justification is:
>>
>> Why do i even need to revert a patch? Only because something got broken
>> by the last syspatch command, that may have applied multiple patches.
>> I might not now which patch caused the problem.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 08:36:21AM +, Michal Bozon wrote:
> On 2017-05-15 Mon 02:23, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > >On 2017-05-15 Mon 01:31, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > >> >2) Notion of transactions
> > >> >
> > >> >Often, more patches are installed at once, with the single `syspatch`
> > >> >command.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 08:36:21AM +, Michal Bozon wrote:
> I think the justification is:
>
> Why do i even need to revert a patch? Only because something got broken
> by the last syspatch command, that may have applied multiple patches.
> I might not now which patch caused the problem.
>
>
On 2017-05-15 Mon 02:23, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >On 2017-05-15 Mon 01:31, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> >2) Notion of transactions
> >> >
> >> >Often, more patches are installed at once, with the single `syspatch`
> >> >command. One might want to be able to revert all those patches at once
> >> >as
>On 2017-05-15 Mon 01:31, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> >2) Notion of transactions
>> >
>> >Often, more patches are installed at once, with the single `syspatch`
>> >command. One might want to be able to revert all those patches at once
>> >as well. A notion of transactions could be made by adding a
On 2017-05-15 Mon 01:31, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >2) Notion of transactions
> >
> >Often, more patches are installed at once, with the single `syspatch`
> >command. One might want to be able to revert all those patches at once
> >as well. A notion of transactions could be made by adding a notion
>
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 07:31:09PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Fri, 12 May 2017 16:15:52 +0200
>
> It seems the problem which had been fixed previous is happening again.
> Does efidev.c have following $OpenBSD$?
>
> /* $OpenBSD: efidev.c,v 1.25 2017/05/11 01:37:24 yasuoka Exp $
(Please ignore. It's my own screwup of dev/audio.c)
On May 14 15:28:26, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> This is current/amdd64 on a Dell Latitude E5570 (dmesg below).
> I am experiencing the following audio regression:
>
> $ aucat -o /tmp/file.wav
> default: couldn't open audio device
>
> This
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:05:38AM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
> We use an internal server to speedup the upgrade of OS and packages of all
> our internal machines (all amd64). We simply set /etc/installurl in every
> machine to point to our server were there are the OS tarballs and packages.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 09:05:38AM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
> We use an internal server to speedup the upgrade of OS and packages of all
> our internal machines (all amd64). We simply set /etc/installurl in every
> machine to point to our server were there are the OS tarballs and packages.
We use an internal server to speedup the upgrade of OS and packages of
all our internal machines (all amd64). We simply set /etc/installurl in
every machine to point to our server were there are the OS tarballs and
packages.
Anyway we'd like to use the standard OpenBSD servers for syspatch as
>2) Notion of transactions
>
>Often, more patches are installed at once, with the single `syspatch`
>command. One might want to be able to revert all those patches at once
>as well. A notion of transactions could be made by adding a notion
>of transactions, but that would add more unnecessary
- Disable and try to exploit (best way to know really)
- If necessary file a bug report with the vendor
- Block perspective ports on your network.
On 14 May 2017 at 21:33, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just checked my router today and found out that the AMT vuln is on there and
>
30 matches
Mail list logo