On 7/7/2011 12:42 PM, IT Guy wrote:
Hi all,
I'm in the process of migrating our company from a certain proprietary mail
system to a new OpenBSD mailserver (IMAP + Postfix).
I'd like to be able to migrate our users one at a time rather than do the whole
company in one fell swoop.
Does anyone
Luiz Gustavo wrote:
Luiz Gustavo S. Costa wrote:
exists other maillist for the discussion about this ?
dev ? pf ?
please, anybody help-me :)
2009/9/28 Luiz Gustavo S. Costa :
has anyone with the same problem? developers? what could this be?
2009/9/26 Luiz Gustavo S. Costa :
Aaron Mason wrote:
Hi all,
Does OpenBSD comply with RFC 3021, allowing /31 subnets for
point-to-point links? I'd resigned to the fact that you couldn't
since each subnet needs a network and broadcast address, though in the
grand scheme of things it makes sense.
TIA
::yawn::
$ sudo ifconf
SD *itself* needs is code and donations, not more devotees
unless I'm severely mistaken.
If someone wants to use inferior tools to for a given project's
requirements I'm more than happy to let them do so (unless they're
paying me for consulting).
Cheers,
Tico
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking into getting switches to be used in port-extender style,
and found a thread from last year recommending Cisco switches. I need
about 20-50 ports atm, and would like to avoid Cisco. My current
preference is using Procurve (2810 or 29xx). Do they work?
What do
ripts you
want, but I was curious why you wanted to start over? What problem with
nsh are you trying to fix?
!Saludos!
Tico
[A] http://www.nmedia.net/nsh/
increase in CPU
use (but still gives an idea on how long you have to wait).
-
In other words, ditto. I've always noticed (and then ignored) a
difference between BSD/Solaris load average running the same processes
vs Linux on the same hw.
systat is much more useful, IMNSHO.
-
t
more experience than I do which is why I'm writing and
listening. Is the two router approach really a bodge or
a legitimate hack?
This should work fine if configured sanely. If your head is really on a
chopping block, it might be wise to either undertake massive testing of
your config
I'm glad I checked my inbox again before responding -- that's exactly
what I was going to say.
+1.
I'm in *no* way convinced that running out of a resource (IPv4
addresses) would be a good thing. It's been my experience that most
network engineers agree with me.
-tico
he flaming starts, remember that I said "most."
Cheers,
Tico
Karl
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-06-15, tico wrote:
Also, if you want to cram two boxes in 1U and still have a decent number
of NICs, check out ABMX:
http://www.abmx.com/1u-twin-server
those are supermicro machines.
Correct. I should have specified that.
they also have short-depth
on a shelf mounted in reverse in the back of your cabinet behind a
switch ... sort of like these guys:
http://www.fubra.com/blog/2007/10/mac-mini-bgp-routers-part-2.html
Cheers,
Tico
John Arnold wrote:
They all did 60+ MB/s, meaning I got at least 60% out of the gig links,
without resorting to jumbo frames, creative recv/sendspace sysctls or
anything, and also I did generate and sink the traffic on the end nodes,
so that also "adds" to the load for them.
Given that they c
I'm not in Spain, but have an interest in Spanish-language BUGs. Also, I
can provide hosting.
-Tico
Mike Erdely wrote:
If you can't get a mailing list set up, I can host a list for you on
metabug.org.
You can also send meeting information (and other posts) to
i...@metabug.org and
g a different router for that
leg of your network.
Imagestream (proprietary+linux based) works for a good+cheap solution
that can talk iBGP to your other ethernet-only routers. Or just get a
used Juniper/Crisco/whatever. See also Sangoma's Wanpipe offerings
(FreeBSD/linux).
-Tico
ds:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=118245939832197&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=119403349716792&w=2
-Tico
Graeme Lee wrote:
tico wrote:
Graeme Lee wrote:
<>
Network layout is somewhat complicated. 1 x ebgp and 1 x ibgp
session receive ipv4 world tables. Gif tunnel to a hurricane router
in Hong Kong. I'm receiving ipv6 world bgp tables from this peer.
Connectivity to the p
n: i = IGP, e = EGP, ? = Incomplete
flags destination gateway lpref med aspath origin
*>2400:6800::/32 2001:470:1:53::1100 0 6939 10105 i
$ uname -mr
4.4 i386
What does your "bgpctl sho nex" give you?
-tico
t seen that behavior occur again after I upgraded to 4.4, but YMMV.
Cheers,
Tico
://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=nx&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html
And CVS shows that nx is no longer in the tree:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/pci/Attic/if_nx.c
As for the hardware itself, I have no experience with it.
-Tico
e an OpenBSD-based
network infrastructure to support your company's needs there are a
number of folks that can provide commercial support, many of which
either lurk on this list or are listed here:
http://www.openbsd.org/support.html
Best regards
-Tico
.
Sound good for me. Is there any patch I can download and compile bgpd
on my own?
Regards,
Falk
Falk,
Read the rest of the thread to which you've just responded:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=122894875212174&w=2
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/bgpd/rde.c
-Tico
meout -- resetting
em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
messages on the console when using the e1000 NIC emulation, but it
doesn't seem to be too severe right now, and is only occurring when I'm
serving a decent bit of data (55-68mbps SSH/rsync data).
Damn, forgot to send my response to list:
Message-ID: <49624a88.3020...@raapid.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:59:36 -0600
From: tico
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "P.Pruett"
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP w/o bdb okay?
References
r a valid AS4_PATH before announcing it onwards to cause
problems for OpenBGPd users, if not others.
I'd rather be missing a route than missing an entire feed and/or
propagating attributes that will kill others' BGP sessions.
-tico
So either of you should contact the ukranian ISP who is at that
prefix; that is the problem, right?
Yes we've been in contact with said ISP. They have called out their on call
engineer and their upstreams are applying pressure. This time it was
unintentional. A rouge isp DoSing all OpenBGP
tico wrote:
Ditto.
This has just caused me the same problems. Alex at Hurricane Electric
found this for me, and my ipv4 BGP sessions have *only* stabilized
after filtering out this prefix (4.4-RELEASE on i386).
I'll post up MRT dumps if anyone's interested.
-Tico
Peter Bristow
Ditto.
This has just caused me the same problems. Alex at Hurricane Electric
found this for me, and my ipv4 BGP sessions have *only* stabilized after
filtering out this prefix (4.4-RELEASE on i386).
I'll post up MRT dumps if anyone's interested.
-Tico
Peter Bristow wrote:
Hi Al
ee weeks ago) missed including any relevant
troubleshooting info.
-Tico
. If you manage to make any progress in your efforts (or any one
else's) to run OpenBSD under Xen with any amount of usefulness, I'd be
interested to hear about it. Feel free to contact me off-list.
Cheers!
-Tico
Whyzzi wrote:
Answers to your questions are inline /w the question
2008/11/18 tico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Why is this sent to the "ports@" mailing list ?
I've lurked the list for a long time - since around 2.8. I've asked
the odd question here and/or there
/avg/max/std-dev = 0.340/0.340/0.340/0.000 ms
$ mount | grep var
/dev/wd0e on /var type ffs (local, nodev)
/dev/wd0h on /var/spool/imap type ffs (local, noatime, nodev, nosuid,
softdep)
Read:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html
afterboot(8), httpd(8), bgplg(8), mount(8)
-tico
ed address families.
Thanks for the quick fix! If anyone is interested, I've got a looking
glass up at http://208.86.95.250/cgi-bin/bgplg and the IPv6 address (not
running the v6-enabled Apache at the moment) is 2607:f618:1::1
Cheers!
Tico
On 2008-09-24, tico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reading the FILTERS section of bgpd.conf lead me to believe that
> simply adding "allow from any inet6 prefixlen 12 - 48" would allow
> the IPv6 prefixes that my neighbor was announcing to me be added
> from the RIB in
URRENT, so forgive me if this is old news -- the only IPv6-related
brokenness that I could find that seemed to even remotely be similar is
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=121036759606446&w=2
et voila!
$ ping6 -S 2607:f618:1::1 ipv6.google.com
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2607:f618:1::1 --> 2001:4860:0:2001::68
16 bytes from 2001:4860:0:2001::68, icmp_seq=0 hlim=59 time=76.009 ms
Anyhow, cheers!
-Tico
35 matches
Mail list logo
