, and is more true, too.
The routing table does not show any appearance of the wrong address,
only some mac addresses for hosts, and some link#n entries for
directly attached networks.
Best,
--Toni++
).
Any insights are most welcome!
Best,
--Toni++
, but to no
avail.
What could that be, and why can't I see this address anywhere?
I'd rather not reboot only to make a change in IP numbers effective...
Best,
--Toni++
comes across good E3 cards, please drop me a
note. Otherwise, try to persuade your carrier to give you Ethernet.
Best,
--Toni++
the badge to avoid any trademark
problems.
Good luck!
Best,
--Toni++
: icmp_seq=140 ttl=64 time=-5.-130 ms
64 bytes from 172.20.10.1: icmp_seq=141 ttl=64 time=-6.-843 ms
Other machines on that same 100MBit/s Ethernet respond within more or
less consistent times of some 0.3-0.5 ms.
Any suggestions are most welcome!
Best,
--Toni++
and require a reboot. But that's occasionally, eg.
1x in some five years accumulated computer uptime (over several
systems), maybe less, although I'd still love to see it fixed.
Best,
--Toni++
application in Linux.
- Toni Spets
next?
Try reading the proposals using tcpdump. I found this quite useful.
Best,
--Toni++
. Then donate them.
Last year I gave ten weeks of electricity for the machine room to OpenBSD.
Meanwhile my employer bought exactly *two* CDs, and I had to push for that.
Ugh.
Best,
--Toni++
that they will donate will DECREASE (if at all possible).
But ok, I will shut up and go on in my little nasty dreamworld.
You should rather come out of it and face the real world, imho.
Best,
--Toni++
.
Do you have something specific on your mind?
Best,
--Toni++
from a European point of view.
If you are a business and have trouble getting the donation into your
tax statement, then just order something from Wim and donate at the
same time.
(Background: OpenBSD is not a charity according to at least German tax
law.)
Best,
--Toni++
misbegotten to me. Try
to name at least one incentive for Alberta to fund a project where the
financial benefits will largely be reaped outside of Alberta.
I don't expect OpenBSD to ever be the major taxpayer of whatever
country or state you name.
Best,
--Toni++
you!
Best,
--Toni++
when to keep my big mouth shut.
Thank you!
Best,
--Toni++
,
--Toni++
a few other routes).
Best,
--Toni++
a good thing, but a better thing is seeing a line flap if
it does, possibly with a differentiation between local and remote end.
Offhand, I don't see anything to this effect in the code (CVS), but
that may well be me.
Thank you!
Best,
--Toni++
(phew!), but I
should find ways to investigate my applications.
TIA!
Best,
--Toni++
misleading top output (despite
the machine feeling quite sluggish)?
How do I generally go about hunting for such a problem?
TIA!
Best,
--Toni++
the machine boots the
named kernel, but instead, it boots _immediately_, so I have no time to
make up my mind to choose a different kernel. What am I doing wrong?
This is a machine originally installed with 3.7, now running stock 3.8
on it's way to -stable.
TIA!
Best,
--Toni++
, no cvsync, no CVSup. That would save him some
network traffic and disk space, and amount to using a remote repository
like described on the anoncvs.html page, but it may be not as robust as
having a local mirror of the entire tree in the face of network or
server problems.
Best,
--Toni++
network. Your internal routing would not
be much affected except that you know how to find the current gateway
where to push the traffic through (ie, detecting and properly handling
line failure). You don't need BGP for that.
Best,
--Toni++
and why such things happen, I'd very much
like to know.
Thank you!
Best,
--Toni++
if I can get
the 3.7 (3.8?) problem solved.
Any help is very much appreciated!
Best,
--Toni++
is not automatic,
but policy - not only your own, but that of other people on the 'Net
as well.
Best,
--Toni++
raise awareness for the problem at their
end. But in the meantime, I've pretty much given up hope that I'll see
any progress talking to these guys.
Wrt. Niklas: You probably want to partially blame me for the gdt(4)
driver Niklas has done so nicely.
Best,
--Toni++
, and where I control only one end, not the
other.
Best,
--Toni++
, originating or
terminating at the gateway machine. Eg. the client says AUTH TLS to
start negotiating SSL...
Best,
--Toni++
to not
having such a driver.
Best,
--Toni++
,
--Toni++
by SSL, thus making
password-sniffing a bit more difficult. Having to chose between no
firewall at the border on the one side and no SSL on the FTP server on
the other is no satisfacory answer.
Best,
--Toni++
to write a driver (or find somebody who can do it).
what is usually needed is docs for some developer(s)
(me for example since i already have a card ;)
Talk to Niklas...
Best,
--Toni++
tried to talk to SBEI, they were not very helpful.
Best,
--Toni++
, it is undesirable as well because tunnels on L2 tend to hang
after a while, with keepalives ensuring a timely restart.
Can anyone please tell me what's going on there, and how/where to fix?
Thank you!
Best,
--Toni++
Hello,
On Wed, 31.08.2005 at 11:50:34 +0200, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
problem: On PPPoE, apparently no keep-alives (LCP echo requests +
answers) get send or received. Therefore, the connection gets reset by
digging the man page and upping the logging noise revealed that LCP
echo
to manually remove an announced network via
bgpctl and later add it again (btw, setting the peer to down didn't
help - after a while it was back up without me setting it up again).
Best,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Thu, 14.07.2005 at 09:07:48 +0200, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
imho just dropping one of them should be sufficient to solve the
problem if they are indistinguishable anyway (perhaps together with a
warning)?
sorry for the noise - of course that might be not so good an idea
exited
Any idea on how to (help) debugging this? Who of you runs bgpd
supervised?
TIA!
Best,
--Toni++
,
--Toni++
established, I see only two SAs, using ipsecadm, when I
expect four (two outer, two inner).
Best,
--Toni++
Hi,
the problem could be nailed down to be related to a hardware defect.
Please see below:
On Tue, 17.05.2005 at 17:09:21 +0200, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bge0 at pci1 dev 13 function 0 Broadcom BCM5705 rev 0x03, BCM5705 A3
(0x3003): irq 9 address 00:e0:81:64:6f:97
brgphy0
pull the LSI card and install an IDE drive,
the box installs and boots with no problems, but I didn't check any
of the NICs yet, so there might be more problems lurking...
Best,
--Toni++
Hi,
from reading some archives I figured that it might be important to note
that the LSI card (53C1020) is PCI-X, but sticks in a regular PCI slot.
I have one other PCI-X type card that should go into this same machine
which I'll probably be able to test tomorrow.
Best,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Wed, 11.05.2005 at 19:14:21 +0200, Rogier Krieger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/11/05, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It crashes after most of dmesg with this error message:
uvm_fault(0x80890500, 0x1, 0, 1) - e
fatal page fault in supervisor mode
trap type 6
401 - 446 of 446 matches
Mail list logo
