On Tuesday 14 March 2006 22:48, FTP wrote:
> If ISPs have a fixed pool of static IP addresses then what happens if we
> 'spend' all the existing ones and nothing is left for the newcomers?
The idea is that IPv6 should have replaced Ipv4 by that time
---
Lars Hansson
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:16:18AM -0500, Peter Landry wrote:
> >> Third, if you live in a house with a single address, you cannot
> >> publicly start announcing different addresses without the postal
> >> service knowing about it. If packets should arrive at your home, then
> >> you better make su
>> Third, if you live in a house with a single address, you cannot
>> publicly start announcing different addresses without the postal
>> service knowing about it. If packets should arrive at your home, then
>> you better make sure you write your street and number on the
>> announcement, other thin
On 2006/03/14 15:48, FTP wrote:
> If ISPs have a fixed pool of static IP addresses then what happens
> if we 'spend' all the existing ones and nothing is left for the
> newcomers?
ISPs should have enough address space for their customers and if they
need more they'll apply for more from an LIR/RIR
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 15:48, you wrote:
> I know the way to have different ports by using NAT but this isn't really
> what I try to achieve!
>
> If ISPs have a fixed pool of static IP addresses then what happens if we
> 'spend' all the existing ones and nothing is left for the newcomers?
>
The
please see my replies below!
Thank you
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 02:43:17PM +0100, Bernd Schoeller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 02:20:15PM +0100, FTP wrote:
> > but isn't a way to route and translate connections via a existing static IP
> > address? To have 'internal' IPs acting as static in
I know the way to have different ports by using NAT but this isn't really what
I try to achieve!
If ISPs have a fixed pool of static IP addresses then what happens if we
'spend' all the existing ones and nothing is left for the newcomers?
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:29:01PM +, Patsy wrote:
>
Forgot "nat" (which is obvious) ... in previous post.
Or for example for different http servers, something like this:
(use pf + rdr + nat)
Server 1 : 10.1.1.1 http port 80 -> router ADSL -> 86.x.x.1 http port
80
Server 2 : 10.1.1.2 http port 8080 -> router ADSL -> 86.x.x.1 http port
8080
Server
D]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 13:50
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: (newbie) a network related question
Server 1 : 10.1.1.1 --> router ADSL--> 86.x.x.x1 (public
static IP!)
Server 2 : 10.1.1.2 --> router ADSL--> 86.178.23.4
Server 3 : 10.1.1.3
but isn't a way to route and translate connections via a existing
static IP address? To have 'internal' IPs acting as static in their
own right? How do ISPs 'create' their own static IPs?
You don't 'create' an IP address; the address is assigned. Basically,
from the IANA to the Regional Inter
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 02:20:15PM +0100, FTP wrote:
> but isn't a way to route and translate connections via a existing static IP
> address? To have 'internal' IPs acting as static in their own right?
> How do ISPs 'create' their own static IPs?
Gee - we are talking about a huge area of topics
but isn't a way to route and translate connections via a existing static IP
address? To have 'internal' IPs acting as static in their own right?
How do ISPs 'create' their own static IPs?
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:08:22PM +, Patsy wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, FTP wrote:
>
>
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, FTP wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> my question isn't really OBSD related but I would like to ask if the
> following scenario can be implemented by using a two NICs OBSD box!
>
> If I get a static IP from my provider, is it possible to 'multiple' this and
> create my own static IPs w
Hi there,
my question isn't really OBSD related but I would like to ask if the following
scenario can be implemented by using a two NICs OBSD box!
If I get a static IP from my provider, is it possible to 'multiple' this and
create my own static IPs which are accessible via the Internet? If the
14 matches
Mail list logo
