Thanks for the precisions :).
And no problem i you laugh because of me :p
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT,
UNIX systems, security and network engineer
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le mardi 08 juillet 2014 à 11:03 +0200, Henning Brauer a écrit :
* InterNetX - Robert Garrett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There is 0 chance this works on OpenBSD. The underlying concepts that
not only make it possible on Dragonfly, but actually useful are not there.
As Henning Brauer pointed out, this makes no sense if the underlying
subsystems arent taken care of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
you will find ldap support within dfly -current..
and no you will not find nfsv4
rg
On 07/06/2014 02:16 AM, Brad Smith wrote:
On 05/07/14 8:01 PM, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Franco Fichtner write:
I have immense respect for Matt as a user of his
On 08 Jul 2014, at 04:55, Henning Brauer hb-open...@ml.bsws.de wrote:
* Franco Fichtner slash...@gmail.com [2014-07-06 00:29]:
Missing SMP support is the fork in the road. The window of opportunity
seems to be closing. A penny for Henning's thoughts on this...
my thoughts are only worth
On 06 Jul 2014, at 01:01, Predrag Punosevac punoseva...@gmail.com wrote:
The rumors are that npf is a vaporware.
npf(4) is a chain of clever data structures. How well that translates
to the actual requirements of the networking domain I can't see.
DragonFly community is tiny.
You mean alive
* Franco Fichtner slash...@gmail.com [2014-07-08 10:48]:
On 08 Jul 2014, at 04:55, Henning Brauer hb-open...@ml.bsws.de wrote:
And the possible pf MP gains are drasticly overrated anyway.
I'm not sure. Maybe that's a stance that fits OpenBSD well, but in
networking as a whole that's not
* InterNetX - Robert Garrett robert.garr...@internetx.com [2014-07-08 09:42]:
Uprading pf with [dfly's] set of changes to support [dfly's] locking
mechanisms, is a seriously non trivial exercise.
and 100% wasted as done.
starting off an old, ancient, pf, which is roughly 4 times slower than
On 08 Jul 2014, at 09:58, Henning Brauer hb-open...@ml.bsws.de wrote:
this has NOTHING to do with the problem or the question at hand.
So then what has it to do with? You tell me I missed the obvious
but don't provide your arguments.
Lucky, I've been asked to leave this mailing list so you
* Franco Fichtner slash...@gmail.com [2014-07-08 11:20]:
On 08 Jul 2014, at 09:58, Henning Brauer hb-open...@ml.bsws.de wrote:
this has NOTHING to do with the problem or the question at hand.
So then what has it to do with? You tell me I missed the obvious
but don't provide your arguments.
Lucky, I've been asked to leave this mailing list so you don't have
to bother. Good luck.
This is quite sad: polite confrontation is always good means of progress,
whatever the topics.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Henning Brauer hb-open...@ml.bsws.de wrote:
* Franco Fichtner slash...@gmail.com [2014-07-06 00:29]:
Missing SMP support is the fork in the road. The window of opportunity
seems to be closing. A penny for Henning's thoughts on this...
my thoughts are only
* sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com [2014-07-08 14:16]:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Henning Brauer hb-open...@ml.bsws.de wrote:
* Franco Fichtner slash...@gmail.com [2014-07-06 00:29]:
Missing SMP support is the fork in the road. The window of opportunity
seems to be closing. A
Hi,
Posting such a topic in such a list might probably sound a bit
aggressive, but this patch should not be misinterpreted. I think it's
clear to everybody that it would be great to update pf in dragonfly, but
that's a lot of work and nobody is working on this. This patch followed
a complaint on
* Joris Giovannangeli jo...@giovannangeli.fr [2014-07-08 17:47]:
Posting such a topic in such a list might probably sound a bit
aggressive, but this patch should not be misinterpreted. I think it's
clear to everybody that it would be great to update pf in dragonfly, but
that's a lot of work
It's a very interesting diff.
If i have time i'll test it on -CURRENT on the two next weeks.
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT, Engineering
UNIX Systems, Security and Network Engineer
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le jeudi 03 juillet 2014 à 11:35 -0500, patric conant a écrit :
This seems relevant
- Original Message -
| It's a very interesting diff.
|
| If i have time i'll test it on -CURRENT on the two next weeks.
|
| --
| Best regards,
|
| Loïc BLOT, Engineering
| UNIX Systems, Security and Network Engineer
| http://www.unix-experience.fr
Considering that these patches use the
* Franco Fichtner slash...@gmail.com [2014-07-06 00:29]:
Missing SMP support is the fork in the road. The window of opportunity
seems to be closing. A penny for Henning's thoughts on this...
my thoughts are only worth pennies? :)
ok, first thought: where's your diff? Not directed at Franco
thanks for the laugh.
* Loïc Blot loic.b...@unix-experience.fr [2014-07-07 10:21]:
It's a very interesting diff.
If i have time i'll test it on -CURRENT on the two next weeks.
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT, Engineering
UNIX Systems, Security and Network Engineer
patric conant wrote:
This seems relevant to a lot of interest.
commit 3a0038bfb239dd522057809c52d7d23dd2134c38
Author: Matthew Dillon dillon at apollo.backplane.com
http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/mailman/listinfo/commits
Date: Thu Jun 26 20:40:32 2014 -0700
pf - make the bulk of PF
On 05 Jul 2014, at 23:42, Predrag Punosevac punoseva...@gmail.com wrote:
I have immense respect for Matt as a user of his code since Amiga C
compiler. I probably speak for lots of people both in OpenBSD and
DragonFly camp if I say that I would prefer him to finish HAMMER2 and
leave concurrent
Franco Fichtner write:
I have immense respect for Matt as a user of his code since Amiga C
compiler. I probably speak for lots of people both in OpenBSD and
DragonFly camp if I say that I would prefer him to finish HAMMER2 and
leave concurrent threading in PF to Henning.
Talks about this
On 05/07/14 8:01 PM, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Franco Fichtner write:
I have immense respect for Matt as a user of his code since Amiga C
compiler. I probably speak for lots of people both in OpenBSD and
DragonFly camp if I say that I would prefer him to finish HAMMER2 and
leave concurrent
This seems relevant to a lot of interest.
commit 3a0038bfb239dd522057809c52d7d23dd2134c38
Author: Matthew Dillon dillon at apollo.backplane.com
http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/mailman/listinfo/commits
Date: Thu Jun 26 20:40:32 2014 -0700
pf - make the bulk of PF concurrent under normal
23 matches
Mail list logo
