On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:26:37PM -0800, Karsten McMinn wrote:
On 10/31/06, Berk D. Demir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under 1 second... Even Firefox...
I can not achieve similar even with prebind'ed binaries on an Athlon64
3500+ with more than 1GB empty DDR2 memory to scratch.
I took a
On 11/1/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additionally, as pointed out, it isn't enabled yet.
I take you mean by default. I've playing with it and it
seems to be doing something. I really should go
read some of the diffs and tech@ to get an idea
where its being loaded. firefox runs
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:43:55AM -0800, Karsten McMinn wrote:
On 11/1/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additionally, as pointed out, it isn't enabled yet.
I take you mean by default. I've playing with it and it
seems to be doing something. I really should go
read some of the
On 10/19/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's true, but once everything is loaded and the system has been
running long enough to figure out what belongs in swap and what belongs
in memory, simple stuff shouldn't take too long. Simple stuff like
opening an xterm.
following up,
Karsten McMinn wrote:
apps are loading in under a second (including firefox) and with
the eye candy all turned on.
Under 1 second... Even Firefox...
I can not achieve similar even with prebind'ed binaries on an Athlon64
3500+ with more than 1GB empty DDR2 memory to scratch.
Good for you.
On 10/31/06, Berk D. Demir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under 1 second... Even Firefox...
I can not achieve similar even with prebind'ed binaries on an Athlon64
3500+ with more than 1GB empty DDR2 memory to scratch.
I took a stopwatch to it and firefox is 2.5 seconds. In other words
it loads in
is the new prebinding code in 4.0?
The code is there. It is not being used by anything yet. There
are things which need to be worked out.
is the new prebinding code in 4.0?
The code is there. It is not being used by anything yet. There
are things which need to be worked out.
and this stuff is documented in the ldconfig(8) manpage, see -P,
if you want to play.
On 2006/10/19 10:03, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
dillo is fast but useless. You can get the same thing with any of the
console browsers like w3m,lynx,elinks etc...
anyone who hasn't tried w3m might have a surprise if they run
w3m-*-image in an xterm.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 10:03:37AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:42:45PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
I'm not sure about KDE, but rxvt loads pretty fast (10ms?) on ion. And
this is not exactly new hardware (neomagic driver, Thinkpad 390X).
aterm takes .5
On 10/17/06, Karsten McMinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what needs to be done in order to
get fast 2d xorg (and friends) performance. I term
fast as not having to wait for window operations, with
most every application and xorg opertation taking no longer
than 100ms. if
On 10/18/06, Jeff Quast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Documentation is key!
http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/CategoryHardwareChipset
http://www.xfree86.org/current/manindex4.html
It took me about 30 minutes to find a $30 ati card that is well
supported. The 9200 looks promising. I was able to find a
On 10/18/06, Karsten McMinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/18/06, Jeff Quast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Documentation is key!
http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/CategoryHardwareChipset
http://www.xfree86.org/current/manindex4.html
It took me about 30 minutes to find a $30 ati card that is well
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:55:10AM -0700, Karsten McMinn wrote:
On 10/18/06, Jeff Quast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Documentation is key!
http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/CategoryHardwareChipset
http://www.xfree86.org/current/manindex4.html
It took me about 30 minutes to find a $30 ati card
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:42:45PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
I'm not sure about KDE, but rxvt loads pretty fast (10ms?) on ion. And
this is not exactly new hardware (neomagic driver, Thinkpad 390X).
aterm takes .5 seconds due to the transparent background, and dillo
takes about 1 second
I'm trying to figure out what needs to be done in order to
get fast 2d xorg (and friends) performance. I term
fast as not having to wait for window operations, with
most every application and xorg opertation taking no longer
than 100ms. if anyone experiences this kind of
performance in any xorg
On 10/17/06, Karsten McMinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what needs to be done in order to
get fast 2d xorg (and friends) performance. I term
fast as not having to wait for window operations, with
most every application and xorg opertation taking no longer
than 100ms. if
On 10/17/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do you mean if anyone experiences anything that bad? i've never had a
window operation take as long as 100ms even using the vesa driver.
the example closest to me at the moment is a desktop I work
on:
OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #617: Thu Mar 2
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:37:32PM -0700, Karsten McMinn wrote:
OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #617: Thu Mar 2 02:26:48 MST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2 GHz
cpu0:
19 matches
Mail list logo
