At 03:07 PM 6/26/2006 -0400, Matt Singerman wrote:
Argh, things have gone from bad to worse.
So I rebooted the machine on a whim, thinking that maybe the network
debacle from earlier could be cleared up by a simple reboot. No go.
And now, if pf is enabled, no traffic can flow anywhere. If it's
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 03:07:04PM -0400, Matt Singerman wrote:
> Argh, things have gone from bad to worse.
>
> So I rebooted the machine on a whim, thinking that maybe the network
> debacle from earlier could be cleared up by a simple reboot. No go.
> And now, if pf is enabled, no traffic can fl
On Jun 26, 2006, at 3:07 PM, Matt Singerman wrote:
.
I am obviously in over my head here.
This may be too obvious, but have you gone through the pf faq? It has
an example ruleset.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/
Mike
Argh, things have gone from bad to worse.
So I rebooted the machine on a whim, thinking that maybe the network
debacle from earlier could be cleared up by a simple reboot. No go.
And now, if pf is enabled, no traffic can flow anywhere. If it's
disabled, the machine acts simply as a bridge.
I a
Okay, I think I understand what you are saying - one of the interfaces
has to have an IP in order to connect into it. My questions is, which
one of the two should it be, and what should it be? I assume not the
same IP as the bridge itself?
On 6/26/06, Peter Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You
On 6/26/06, Peter Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That sorta makes sense if your firewall was working as a bridge, but I
don't think that you mentioned anything about a bridgename.bridge0.
Was/Is your machine acting as a nat-style firewall? If so, then
you'll have to assign it some IPs.
How l
You should be able to configure one of the bridged interfaces to have
an IP in order for you to SSH into the box.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Bridge
On 6/26/06, Matt Singerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe the server was configured as a bridge - bridgename.bridge0
exists, and co
I believe the server was configured as a bridge - bridgename.bridge0
exists, and contains:
add dc0 add dc1 up
It was running for a good 300 days or so. It was set up and
configured by my predecessor, and I am not completely sure on all of
its configurations.
On 6/26/06, Peter Blair <[EMAIL PRO
That sorta makes sense if your firewall was working as a bridge, but I
don't think that you mentioned anything about a bridgename.bridge0.
Was/Is your machine acting as a nat-style firewall? If so, then
you'll have to assign it some IPs.
How long was it running since its last reboot? Were the
Hi all,
Well, I emailed the list earlier with another problem, but that has
been completely supplanted by this new one.
I work for a small department within a larger organization, and we
have a fair amount of lattitude - we run our own servers and whatnot.
We had a special exception under organi
10 matches
Mail list logo
