Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

On 07/08/14 23:36, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote: What you are trying is not new, but crazy and sh*t seem pretty spot on. Your description, not mine. There's even a wikipedia article dedicated to how dumb this is! >From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database-as-IPC: In computer programmin

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

What you are trying is not new, but crazy and sh*t seem pretty spot on. Your description, not mine. There's even a wikipedia article dedicated to how dumb this is! >From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database-as-IPC: In computer programming, Database-as-IPC is an anti-pattern where

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

On 07/08/14 11:08, Henning Brauer wrote: * Gustav Fransson Nyvell [2014-07-06 03:22]: I made this thing because I wanted or need a way to message between processes that know nothing about each other, using a central name. that's usually called a named pipe. or an mmap'ed "file". Without requ

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

* Gustav Fransson Nyvell [2014-07-06 15:25]: > Of course, I'm looking for > problems in imsg, now... sorry. no, you're missing the point entirely and have been misguided by others. what you are apparently after is what is usually called a message bus/queue. reliable message delivery to n clients

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

* Gustav Fransson Nyvell [2014-07-06 03:22]: > I made this thing because I wanted or need a way to message between > processes that know nothing about each other, using a central name. that's usually called a named pipe. or an mmap'ed "file". > Without requiring any network. So, some basic mes

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

On 07/06/14 15:44, Eugene Yunak wrote: > Can you even read? Can you please stay away from public mailing lists > for sane people? > > > On 6 July 2014 16:25, Gustav Fransson Nyvell > wrote: > > On 07/06/14 15:20, Thomas Adam wrote: > > On 6 July 2014 14:09, Gu

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

Can you even read? Can you please stay away from public mailing lists for sane people? On 6 July 2014 16:25, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: > On 07/06/14 15:20, Thomas Adam wrote: > >> On 6 July 2014 14:09, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: >> >>> This imsg looks pretty much like what I've done, ho

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

On 07/06/14 15:20, Thomas Adam wrote: On 6 July 2014 14:09, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: This imsg looks pretty much like what I've done, however, libmessage does not require any bounds checking whatsoever. It's way easier to use. I'm I think you meant to say "does not require any error check

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

On 07/06/14 14:58, Thomas Adam wrote: On 6 July 2014 13:54, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: I heard about the iPhone? Thanks, I'll look it up. //Gustav No, not Apple, for goodness sake, man! See this: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=msgbuf_drain -- Thomas Adam Hm, seems like ims

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

On 6 July 2014 14:09, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: > This imsg looks pretty much like what I've done, however, libmessage does > not require any bounds checking whatsoever. It's way easier to use. I'm I think you meant to say "does not require any error checking". ;) Don't get me wrong, I don't

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

On 07/06/14 14:58, Thomas Adam wrote: On 6 July 2014 13:54, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: I heard about the iPhone? Thanks, I'll look it up. //Gustav No, not Apple, for goodness sake, man! See this: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=msgbuf_drain -- Thomas Adam Hi, Someone took

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

On 6 July 2014 13:54, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: > I heard about the iPhone? Thanks, I'll look it up. //Gustav No, not Apple, for goodness sake, man! See this: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=msgbuf_drain -- Thomas Adam

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

On 07/06/14 14:39, Thomas Adam wrote: On 6 July 2014 02:20, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: I made this thing because I wanted or need a way to message between processes that know nothing about each other, using a central name. Without requiring any network. So, some basic message passing, across

Re: libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

On 6 July 2014 02:20, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: > I made this thing because I wanted or need a way to message between > processes that know nothing about each other, using a central name. > Without requiring any network. So, some basic message passing, across > the OS. It's implemented using s

libmessage (New crazy sh*t)

Hi there, I made this thing because I wanted or need a way to message between processes that know nothing about each other, using a central name. Without requiring any network. So, some basic message passing, across the OS. It's implemented using sqlite3 which in my case is not good, because I