Jason Dixon wrote:
Unless you've got a DS-3 or better, why does it matter?
1 interface is for the ADSL connection. I'm not worried about that.
2 interfaces are local networks. It's the throughput between those 2
that I noticed a bit of a bottleneck. It's not *that* bad. It's more
suprising
On 10/9/05, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, i was talking about OBSD!
Anyhow, what would it be the problem with DTrace, for OBSD not supporting it?
if you have to ask that question, you have no business running a tool
like dtrace.
aaron.glenn
On 10/7/05, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran an Ultra-5 for 2 years straight as my home firewall. It got replaced
with an hppa just because I could :-) My mailserver is still an ultra-5 that
has run for 3 years. The only time it has been down is when my ups gave out.
Sparc +
On Friday 07 October 2005 21:28, Joe S wrote:
Is anyone on the list running an Ultra 5 as firewall? I would like to
move my firewall from an overpowered P4-3GHz box to a Sun Ultra 5 360MHz.
Yes. My Sun Ultra 5 isn't just a firewall, but an NFS server with a relatively
large disk for my home
OpenBSD i386 3.7 GENERIC.MP
How do you bind/lock a process (and if possible childs) to a specific cpu?
Directions to TFM/more info gladly accepted...
regards
/David
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Hello,
I have an external USB 2.0 storage device with OpenBSD i386
installation and some free space. Is it possible to install
OpenBSD/macppc on that spare space without breaking my i386
installation?
ew, ick.
How will it all work? Would it be possible to
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 07:00:55AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Hello,
I have an external USB 2.0 storage device with OpenBSD i386
installation and some free space. Is it possible to install
OpenBSD/macppc on that spare space without breaking my i386
On Oct 10, 2005, at 2:16 AM, Joe S wrote:
Jason Dixon wrote:
Unless you've got a DS-3 or better, why does it matter?
1 interface is for the ADSL connection. I'm not worried about that.
2 interfaces are local networks. It's the throughput between those
2 that I noticed a bit of a
Hi,
Finally I got around to testing mbuf tag merging patch by Henning
that Theo suggested. For the details on the test setup see my
original post [1], only difference now is that the interfaces are
all on different interrupts.
Only i386 results now, I didn't have the time to test amd64.
I've been reading through manpages and tutorials but have not been
able to get an answer to a question I have.
I am wondering if it's possible to use OpenBSD as an unnumbered PPPoE
client bridge. Basically a transparent bridge that processes packets
for PPPoE so the rest of the network
Hi,
we have an failover-test-setup looking like below:
+CARP0-HOST(M)-CARP1--(WAN)
|
(WAN)RemoteHost---RemotLAN
+CARP0-HOST(B)-CARP1--(WAN)
|
|
LocalLAN
ipsec(isakmpd) is setup to build a vpn between LocalLAN and
There is something wrong with my rules file, and I cant find the problem.
pf.conf...
# $OpenBSD: pf.conf,v 1.28 2004/04/29 21:03:09 frantzen Exp $
#
# See pf.conf(5) and /usr/share/pf for syntax and examples.
# Remember to set net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 and/or net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1
# in
Testing new config.
--
The only way to keep your health is to eat what you don't want, drink
what you don't like, and do what you'd rather not.
- Mark Twain
On 10.10.2005, at 16:35, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
altq on $if cbq bandwidth 100Mb queue { all, local, http, ssh, rsets }
try other names. one of them seems to be a keyword?!
{ xall, xlocal, xhttp, xssh, xrsets }
Karl-Heinz
maybe i've missed something.
ifconfig rl0 group wan_if
pf.conf:
- altq on wan_if cbq bandwidth 100Mb queue { http ssh }
produce an error when loading the ruleset.
but every other rules like
- pass in on wan_if proto tcp to port ssh keep state queue ssh
will be accepted.
isn't that a bit
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 12:35:10AM +1000, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
altq on $if cbq bandwidth 100Mb queue { all, local, http, ssh, rsets }
use a different name instead of all, like std. all is a reserved
keyword.
queue all bandwidth 32Kb proirity 1
queue local bandwidth 100Mb proirity 10
thanks everyone, problems fixed.
I love you guys.
On 10/11/05, John Kintaro Tate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is something wrong with my rules file, and I cant find the problem.
pf.conf...
# $OpenBSD: pf.conf,v 1.28 2004/04/29 21:03:09 frantzen Exp $
#
# See pf.conf(5) and
Ouff found the problem ...
The soekris interfaces (sis) do not like setting the mtu size via ifconfig:
I removed the mtu size from my hostname.pppoe0
and do this via pf with:
scrub out on pppoe0 max-mss 1440
Now it works, no browsing problems anymore!
Hey Joe (where are you goin' with that OpenBSD CD in your hand?), ; )
On 10/10/2005, at 11:02 AM, Joe S wrote:
After doing my own tests, I found that the Ultra 5 was too slow to
perform near wire-speed throughput.
TEST 1 - Sun Ultra 5 360MHz
dc0 and dc1 are Phobos 430TX quad nic, PCI
Perhaps I've misread the man page, but it's not obvious to me how to zero the
PF
counters. For example, 'pfctl -si' shows a non-zero congestion counter, and
I'd
like to clear that counter after I think the congestion issue is remedied. But
I see no way to do that (apart from a reboot). How
Shane J Pearson wrote:
I'm using a U10 for the extra PCI slot allowing me to have the 5 NICS
I need for my current desired config.
Have you considered a multi-port card...?
The U10 apparently can also go
to 440MHz with 2Mbyte L2. I wonder if the U5 could take this anyway?
I currently am
Hello-
in reading the thread about running pf on an ultra 5, I saw that people
were running fxp NICs in them. I started thinking about the possibility
of running a Mylex Acceleraid 250 or any other RAID controller that
OpenBSD supports in an Ultra5.
I have been caught up in thinking that
Hi Matthew,
On 11/10/2005, at 7:03 AM, Matthew Weigel wrote:
Have you considered a multi-port card...?
I did. I was hoping to find a quad port fxp, but couldn't find one. I
know of the quad port dc's, but I've heard a few times of problems
with them. Since I already had an Ultra 10, I just
Ok, I found the supported hardware for the sparc64 platform. I guess it
does not have any RAID controllers that work. That is too mad since I
am really fond of sparc hardware.
-Bob
Original Message
From: - Mon Oct 10 17:30:00 2005
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
Hi Bob,
On 11/10/2005, at 7:29 AM, Bob Ababurko wrote:
in reading the thread about running pf on an ultra 5, I saw that
people were running fxp NICs in them. I started thinking about the
possibility of running a Mylex Acceleraid 250 or any other RAID
controller that OpenBSD supports in
Shane J Pearson wrote:
Hi Matthew,
On 11/10/2005, at 7:03 AM, Matthew Weigel wrote:
Have you considered a multi-port card...?
I did. I was hoping to find a quad port fxp, but couldn't find one.
Why not look at quad-port GigE cards? I know for sure em(4) has available
quad-port cards.
Hi...
Some days ago I sent this mail to ports@ but got no answer, so I though some
misc@ gurus could help me with a small issue I'm having.
I'm working on my audacity port. I'm facing a strange error (tried on
i386 and macppc /current). This error happens when building audacity with wxgtk2
and
On 11/10/2005, at 7:54 AM, Matthew Weigel wrote:
Why not look at quad-port GigE cards? I know for sure em(4) has
available
quad-port cards.
I will for the future.
It doesn't make it any faster as a server, either. ;-)
I've got an Ultra-Wide or Ultra2 SCSI card in my Ultra 10, and it
Original Message
Subject:Re: IDE disk problems
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:45:45 -0400
From: Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Steve Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Harding wrote:
Nick and
I have a web server running apache/php/mysql for web and postfix/courier
for mail. using the PEAR php code for sending mail my server can
successfully send mail from a php script as long as the recipient is a
local domain. (I can pick up the mail remotely using pop3).
If I try to send to a
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
I guess therefore that I don't need SASL or any authenticated SMTP. I'm
guessing that I need somehow to allow relaying
in mail.cf ?
http://www.metaconsultancy.com/whitepapers/smtp.htm#s6
and then to block port 25
on the external interface to stop ppl outside the
On 10/10/05, David misc@openbsd.org wrote:
OpenBSD i386 3.7 GENERIC.MP
How do you bind/lock a process (and if possible childs) to a specific cpu?
you don't.
On 10/10/05, Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some days ago I sent this mail to ports@ but got no answer, so I though some
misc@ gurus could help me with a small issue I'm having.
I'm working on my audacity port. I'm facing a strange error (tried on
i386 and macppc /current). This
|I have a web server running apache/php/mysql for web and
|postfix/courier
|for mail. using the PEAR php code for sending mail my server can
|successfully send mail from a php script as long as the recipient is a
|local domain. (I can pick up the mail remotely using pop3).
|
|If I try to send
On 10/9/05, Andreas Bihlmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MSDOS is ALWAYS ALWAYS 'i' in disklabel even if the whole drive is formated
except when it's not, of course.
Jaap Versteegh wrote:
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
I guess therefore that I don't need SASL or any authenticated SMTP. I'm
guessing that I need somehow to allow relaying
in mail.cf ?
http://www.metaconsultancy.com/whitepapers/smtp.htm#s6
and then to block port 25
on the external interface
[IMAGE]
Dear Fulton Bank Member,
This email is to inform you, that we had to block your Fulton Bank
account access because we have been notified that your account may have
been compromised by outside parties.
Our terms and conditions you agreed to state that your account must
always be under
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, bridge(4) doesn't
support
pppoe(4) as a possible interface. I don't know why, but it
just
rejects it. Anyone know of a workaround for this? I'm on a
100mb/s
FTTH line so a userland pppoe is not an option.
Kory T
i don't think you can filter
I want to set up an OBSD box as a file server for some Windoze boxes. I
think a RAID 1 setup will provide sufficient reliability - and it
appears to be the cheapest way to go.
I don't desire to become an expert on RAID, I don't want to spend a lot
of money, and I'm confused by what I've read
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:09:39 -0500, J Moore wrote:
I want to set up an OBSD box as a file server for some Windoze boxes. I
think a RAID 1 setup will provide sufficient reliability - and it
appears to be the cheapest way to go.
I don't desire to become an expert on RAID, I don't want to spend
J Moore wrote:
I want to set up an OBSD box as a file server for some Windoze boxes. I
think a RAID 1 setup will provide sufficient reliability - and it
appears to be the cheapest way to go.
I don't desire to become an expert on RAID, I don't want to spend a lot
of money, and I'm confused by
This is HTML source of message you composed. Do not modify here. To
modify this message press HTML Messages Editor button.
[IMAGE] Dear
FirstMerit customer,
We recently reviewed your account, and suspect that your
FirstMerit
--- Quoting William Bloom on 2005/10/10 at 13:56 -0700:
The PF man page gives meager detail about the congestion counter. And the
only
FAQ items for this that I can find are related to queueing (and I don't have
queues in my ruleset). What is the meaning of a non-zero congestion counter,
43 matches
Mail list logo
