From: "Henning Brauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-29 22:20]:
I was looking at the HP DL-145 G2 with SCSI on them and I also saw the
new Sun X4100.
Looking at the less then complete technical information on the Sun
server, I don't see the details of the chip
On 01/10/2005, at 10:04 AM, Sam Vaughan wrote:
On 30/09/2005, at 6:58 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
However, the onboard storage controller probably wont work out of
the box right now. It's a SAS variant of the chips supported by
the mpt driver. According to marco it isn't as trivial
On 23/10/2005, at 7:29 PM, Luka Macura wrote:
Hello all,
Thank you for hint, amd64 architecture does work on our HW !
Everything was instaled fine (I instaled latest snapshot). But we have
another problem.
When I look into BIOS, there is no possibility to do good irq routing.
BIOS groups almo
On 26/10/2005, at 12:13 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
jon and marco,
thx for the quick replies. this is more or less what i expected.
if you install through the RAID controller, shouldn't it
autodetect the number of actually available sectors (i.e. the
"full" size modulo
From: "Alexandre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all,
I looked in man 4 ath, man 8 ifconfig and man 8 wicontrol but did find out
the answer to my question:
Is there any tool like wicontrol for ath cards ?
Typically, how can I scan for access points ?
I think this was added post 3.7, but you might b
On 09/11/2005, at 3:25 PM, Martin Ekendahl wrote:
I'm a bit embarrassed to say, but I have a dedicated colo which I
bought, and I don't know the specifics of it (other than generic
specs). I'd would guess it's hand built. Whats a good line to take
from the dmesg to name my files? Maybe the
On 13/12/2005, at 2:53 PM, Lars Hansson wrote:
I upgraded one of my Dell Poweredge 1550/1000's to 3.8-release
yesterday
and noticed that a safte device was found but there are no counters
in sysctl:
# sysctl hw
hw.machine=i386
hw.model=Intel Pentium III ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)
hw.ncpu=1
hw
this line here shows your problem:
"Nvidia CK804 LAN" rev 0xa3 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 not configured
there is no driver for the nforce ethernet controller simply because we have
no documentation for it.
this was fixed in revision 1.92 of src/sys/dev/ic/ami.c. the problem
is that a busy logical disk can starve the available openings on the
passthrough bus. this means that the safte io is being attempted, but
insufficient resources are available to complete it. a lack of
resources causes an
From: "capereiragomes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I need to connect an external hard disk, that is inside an usb enclosure,
to
an old notebook that has only usb v.
1.0.
I've searched the archives and i386.html page, but could not be sure if
From: "Bill Marquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 1/12/06, RV Tec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, on a related issue: any thoughts on SUN FIRE X4200?
I recently got my hands on one, there's some issues with it (like the
SAS drives aren't showing up, oops). If the usb on it works, I'll
post a d
On 14/02/2006, at 2:24 PM, Joshua Sandbrook wrote:
The thing about that though, is it assumes I already have a working
system..
eg, solaris is already installed.
Any ways around this?
I remember migrating an ultra 10 from solaris to openbsd onto the
swap partition of the solaris install,
On 16/02/2006, at 2:25 PM, Nick Guenther wrote:
On 2/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi fellows,
having issues to get the cardbus working.
Hardware: Asus Pundit AB-P2600
Cardbus Chipset: ENE CB-710Q Chip
vendor "ENE", unknown product 0x0510 (class memory subclass flash,
From: "Lars Weste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi list,
I am trying to setup a network between two OpenBSD 3.8 hosts via a USB
interface. I wanted to use the Interface as a pfsync device.
I thought it have read somewhere it is possible but cannot remember where,
so when I issue a: apropos usb | grep -i
yes, they work well.
dlg
On 29/05/2012, at 11:38 PM, Pierre Berthier wrote:
> Hi
>
> it seems to me the Myricom 10GB Ethernet devices should be supported by
> OpenBSD, according to myx(4) and the What's new page of 5.0
> http://www.openbsd.org/50.html#new and actually also 4.2
> http://www.open
On 13/08/2012, at 5:42 PM, C. L. Martinez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to do some tests with OpenBSD 5.1 and FreeBSD 9.1 beta in
> my laptop virtual lab based on vmware workstation 8. But I have found
> a problem when I try to configure OpenBSD vms: I can't use e1000
> driver with these OpenBS
On 27/06/2011, at 9:31 PM, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Dear list member,
>
> i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing is ok, expect for
> disk information report.
> It is showed as wd0. I am confused because as far as i know it is a sata
device.
>
> Why does it (OpenBSD) see it as an old w
On 30/06/2011, at 6:56 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Tom Murphy wrote:
>
>> /bsd: bnx0: Watchdog timeout occurred, resetting!
>> /bsd: splassert: assertwaitok: want -1 have 1
>> /bsd: Starting stack trace...
>> /bsd: assertwaitok() at assertwaitok+0x1c
>> /bsd: pool_get() at pool_g
i believe a lot of these docs were opened up due to jeff garzik talking to
silicon image as part of his work on libata in linux.
credit where credit is due...
dlg
On 23/07/2011, at 10:49 PM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> Hi,
> Someone posted a series of links to the freebsd-hardware mailing list
>
On 24/07/2011, at 8:27 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:10 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
>>
>> On 20/04/2011, at 11:08 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:22 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
>>>> you might be able to up
mike,
might have to tweak hardmtu in attach too. maybe.
dlg
On 23/10/2011, at 6:18 AM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 20:14 +0200, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote:
>>
>> On both sides I use em(4) with MTU 9000.
>> Then tried to set the same value to the pfsync with success (ifconfig
pf
linux runs infinite loops in 5 minutes, so thats not a huge problem for them.
On 01/11/2011, at 2:05 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> how does linux handle that without going into infinite loops?
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Mikolaj Kucharski
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Attached archive has small
i hate to bring this up, but if you have cisco gear with dhcp snooping enabled
you can enforce this on the switch.
On 20/02/2010, at 8:49 PM, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Is it possible to do filtering through pf or blocking traffic based of MAC
adress
> recognition ?
>
> We want to i
your 880 has two internal fibre loops. you see teh disks once on the first
loop, and again on the second loop.
i am slowly working on finishing mpath(4), which will let you see your disks
once no matter how many paths you have to them. if someone could email me some
spare time so i can finish work
id use asr-disable in ofw to disable the second fc hba for now.
dlg
On 02/03/2010, at 12:56 AM, Pete Vickers wrote:
> Hei,
>
>
> Upon booting either 4.6-RELEASE or 4.7-BETA on my SunFire 880 causes the
> kernel it to 'see' twice the correct number of physical disk. Further if I
> install the o/s
On 10/03/2010, at 1:54 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> Hi @misc:
>
> My OpenBSD amd64 box running current (as march 4, 2010), is dying
unexpectedly
> when reading /dev/rcd0c:
can you be more specific about what "reading /dev/rcd0c" is? are you dding off
it, or using cdio, or what?
>
>
On 14/03/2010, at 4:41 AM, P. Souza wrote:
> Has anyone tested the network throughput on these sweet little things?
not really. ive always been limited by the speed of wireless, or the speed of
the dsl link im using. i havent got close to high cpu usage on my rb600 unless
i was compiling stuff.
On 14/03/2010, at 10:36 AM, P. Souza wrote:
>> Has anyone tested the network throughput on these sweet little things?
>
> Not that relevant but I thought I'd share my findings anyway.
> According to some page I found(TM), the RB600 measured about 250 Mbps
> on iperf on both debian and routerOS[1].
if you can get oracle to change the license to something acceptable to the
openbsd tree then id consider porting it.
On 22/03/2010, at 9:33 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hello
>
> Are there any plans to bring ZFS support to OpenBSD so that users
> don't have to worry about things like fsck, running out
On 30/03/2010, at 2:55 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I have been looking for some sort of whiteboard like software that runs
> over the net. Anyone know a name of a port?
i want multiplayer vi.
ola,
ive recently made a start on better supporting disks in openbsd that present
512 byte logical sectors, but actually use 4096 byte physical sectors on the
platter. the best examples of these are the western digital "advanced format"
SATA drives which have been mention on misc@ before. it was n
On 21/04/2010, at 3:58 AM, Daniel Barowy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone know the status/plans of TRIM support in OpenBSD? I poked around a
bit in ahci.c and scsi.c, but nothing pops out at me (I also don't really know
what I'm looking for).
the status of TRIM support is that there is none.
i have
On 12/05/2010, at 9:28 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>
> Particularly seeing I referenced both of those in my original post as
> not being helpful and I've been trying to get somebody - anybody - to
> write a minimal NAT ruleset and show me.
i use the following on my router at home:
pass
block log on
On 21/05/2010, at 5:43 PM, Leonardo Lombardo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can someone describe me exactly how hfsc service curve works ?
>
> I've tried playing with this parameter but with no success. I think if I
specify something like upperlimit(x, n, y) then tcp connections that are in
that queue will
this diff implements the disk cache ioctl handling in mpii so sd(4)
can drive the change rather than have mpii(4) whack everything.
modelled on the same functionality in mpi(4) and mikeb's code...
could someone test this please?
Index: mpii.c
==
i believe the diff below should work out of the box. it pulls in
all mikeb's fixes.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:54:09PM +0100, ??ukasz Czarniecki wrote:
> With following Mike's suggestions it worked.
>
>
> # scsi -f /dev/rsd0c -m 8
> IC: 0
> ABPF: 0
> CAP: 0
> DISC: 0
> SIZE: 0
> WCE: 1
> M
id like to reiterate ryans advice to have a look at the systat mbuf output.
as he said, mclgeti will try to protect the host by restricting the number of
packets placed on the rx rings. it turns out you dont need (or cant use) a lot
of packets on the ring, so bumping the ring size is a useless twe
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #36: Mon Apr 4 09:39:35 EST 2011
d...@hotspare.eait.uq.edu.au:/home/dlg/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.
MP
real mem = 137428045824 (131061MB)
avail mem = 133755703296 (127559MB)
seems to work ok...
i had this same problem and fixed it in time for the 4.8 release. is it
possible you can upgrade?
On 20/04/2011, at 9:10 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> I'm having a bit of an issue with OpenOSPFd on 4.7 running on i386
hardware.
>
> The gist of the problem is that it seems that changes to the kern
that by going "pfctl -S
/dev/stdout | ssh activefw pfctl -L /dev/stdin" as root on the passive fw.
as a matter of interest, are you using ospf for failover on one side of your
firewalls?
dlg
On 20/04/2011, at 2:45 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:14 PM, David
On 20/04/2011, at 11:08 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:22 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
>> you might be able to upgrade your passive firewall to 4.9 next to the
active 4.7 one. it looks like the protocol stayed the same so they should be
able to talk to each other.
amen.
anything that helps us get away from the kernels arbitrary numbering of
devices to identify disks is a good thing.
dlg
On 28/04/2011, at 10:20 AM, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 04/27/11 08:27, Kent Watsen wrote:
>>> Maybe you should tell us what happened and what you were expecting.
>>
>> I sa
On 29/04/2011, at 3:33 AM, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 04/28/2011 10:58 AM, Bryan wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 19:55, David Gwynne wrote:
>>> amen.
>>>
>>> anything that helps us get away from the kernels arbitrary numbering of
>>> devices t
this is why i like duids:
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #1: Fri Apr 29 14:55:51 EST 2011
d...@hotspare.eait.uq.edu.au:/home/dlg/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.
MP
real mem = 137428045824 (131061MB)
avail mem = 133755645952 (127559MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.6 @
On 29/04/2011, at 4:48 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> Op 29 apr. 2011 om 07:00 heeft David Gwynne het volgende
geschreven:
>
>> this is why i like duids:
>
> Is this what you get when you max out every option when ordering a machine?
no...
when doing a bulk update pfsync only generates 100 packets a second. each
packet will be filled with as many full state update messages as possible.
unfortunately the full state update message is about 264 bytes so you can only
fit 5 in a packet. that means 5 * 100 or 500 messages a second, which
On 05/05/2011, at 10:27 PM, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 05/05/11 13:37, David Gwynne wrote:
>> i do this on my firewalls sometimes:
>>
>> root@passive ~# ssh master pfctl -S /dev/stdout | pfctl -L /dev/stdin
>>
>> its a bit faster...
>>
>> dlg
&
anyone replaced firewalls with 4.9 boxes yet? noticed a difference?
On 14/05/2011, at 6:43 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
>
> I'm starting to get angry about the _horrible_ performance on this drive
> (WD10EARS-00Y), some developer ever got a chance to see something about
> this?
don't get angry, it's just a disk.
we changed the default alignment of part
hey david,
pf is run twice on packets going through a box, once before the network stack
and again as it leaves it. this means you have to allow a packet in one side
as well as when it goes out the other.
dlg
On 17/05/2011, at 10:16 PM, David Schulz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i have a LAN within a LA
On 06/06/2010, at 12:29 PM, Neal Hogan wrote:
> Don't act like this is normal. Where in the archives has this been
reported?
> Like I said, I appreciate the difference and the suggestions. The
> archives require this post, because it is unexpected. Thanks for the
> help.
http://www.openbsd.org/fa
On 24/06/2010, at 10:22 AM, David Holligan wrote:
>> SCSI scanners are marked "obsolete" at least as of the latest SCSI
>> working drafts, and other than updates to keep in sync with other
>> kernel subsystem changes, ss(4) doesn't seem to have received any real
>> attention in about a decade.
>
On 20/07/2010, at 2:48 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> I run a small server using an ALIX box and a CF card (wd0)
> plus two external disks (sd0, sd1) - see the dmesg at bottom.
>
> The CF card holds the system, while the two external disks are
> big storages that are only used sparsely; one of them is a (
relayd can do this i think.
On 26/08/2010, at 9:10 AM, dontek wrote:
> Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
>> Don Tek wrote:
>>> I've recently implemented a firewall with two internet connections
>>> using multipath routing and round-robin outbound load balancing.
>>>
>>> I am looking for a solution from
On 28/08/2010, at 12:19 AM, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm willing to buy a SATA controller (PCI) with at least 4 ports.
> I'll put it on an Alpha 500au or a Sun Ultra 5, if it doesn't work
> out, on an old intel.
>
> Any recommendations ?
sili(4). you might have more success
we'll happily take diffs though.
On 29/08/2010, at 4:14 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> There is currently no support for native sata hotplug in OpenBSD,
> so this is expected.
>
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 07:31:26PM +0200, Gerald Holl wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm using OpenBSD 4.7 on an IBX 530 Intel At
On 01/09/2010, at 8:37 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-08-31, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
>> I have troubles with on OpenBSD 4.7 with HP DL 120 G5
>>
>> Actually I'm trying to unpack src.tar.gz and see that it's very slow.
> ...
>> mpi0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Symbios Logic SAS1068E" rev 0x08:
On 06/09/2010, at 9:04 AM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> Hiya,
> Is there any reason why OpenBSD (same behaviour is exhibited on
> FreeBSD) uses the 82801HBM sata controller in SATA mode when the
> controller support AHCI mode on the MacBookPro1,3?
>
> dmesg, pcidump & acpidump output here:
> http://
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:41:15PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-10-04, Insan Praja SW wrote:
> > I can't see any livelocks. I'm aware of new algorithm on mclgeti got
> > something to do with this, I just want to confirm this. If this systat
> > output tells me the truth, well that
On 16/12/2009, at 4:50 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:15:25 -0500, Ted Unangst
>> wrote:
>>> As the manufacturers point out, 10,000 write cycles (basically the
>>> minimum) means you can overwrite the flash once per day for 27 years.
>>> That's a lot of IO for a soekris.
>>
>>
On 17/12/2009, at 10:25 PM, Joakim Dellrud wrote:
> Hello.
> First of I would like to ask for forgivness if I post this question in the
> wrong list, I'm new to this...
>
> So now to my question: I have a Microsoft 2003 Active Directory server and
> an already working configuration for a Centos/r
On 17/12/2009, at 11:02 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Aaron Mason [2009-12-17 03:50]:
>> From what I've seen, 4k blocks are supported by most filesystems
>> anyway - and besides, provided the partitions are created on 4k block
>> boundaries, there's no reason for any concern IMHO.
>
> you are mis
On 18/12/2009, at 1:26 PM, Raymond Lillard wrote:
> Brad Tilley wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:12 -0800, "Randal L. Schwartz"
>> wrote:
"Brad" == Brad Tilley writes:
>>> Brad> I use ed in emergencies when /usr is inaccessible, but I'm a lot
>>> more
>>> Brad> comfortable with vi. Will
can you tell me what version of src/sys/scsi/sd.c you are running?
cheers,
dlg
On 23/12/2009, at 12:37 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i was having difficulties reproducing this (as expected probably)
> but i managed to get one trace:
>
> splassert: biodone: want 80 have 0
> Starting
id try this on a sili(4), ahci(4), or mpi(4) controller and see what happens.
my guess is you're hitting issues in the ata stack, specifically to do with
the block offsets of your io ops.
dlg
On 01/01/2010, at 12:03 AM, Scott McEachern wrote:
> I've been using dd to test some of my hard drives
On 19/01/2010, at 7:04 PM, Michael Lechtermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it already possible to mount iSCSI devices with OpenBSD(-current)?
no.
On 30/01/2010, at 10:34 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:08:51PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>> On 19/01/2010, at 7:04 PM, Michael Lechtermann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is it already possible to mount iSCSI devices with OpenBSD(-c
On 02/02/2010, at 1:51 PM, James Peltier wrote:
>
> match out on vlan301 from vlan303:network nat-to vlan301
all the cool kids are going:
match out on vlan301 nat-to vlan301 received-on vlan303
On 03/02/2010, at 8:49 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-02-01, Keith wrote:
>> I've used OpenBSD & PF for a number of years without issue and am now in
>> the position that I want to create a dmz between the Internet and my
>> organisations WAN. Our security people are asking if the firewa
hello,
i would encourage people to consider sending donations in for this, i think it
would be an extremely good investment. claudio already has a good start on an
implementation of an iscsi initiator, but he's at the point where he needs
real gear to work and test against. given the gear i fully
On 16/02/2010, at 1:57 AM, Dominique Goncalves wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've installed two OpenBSD 4.6 servers with dhcpd and synchronisation
> option (server1 & server2). So far everything works, leases are sync
> between servers.
>
> If I shutdown server1, server2 will give address to new computers
On 17/02/2010, at 12:12 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:54:47PM -0600, Corey wrote:
>>
>> Throwing out a topic for discussion...I have seen a couple of posts on
>> here regarding use of VLANs to segregate traffic that I would usually
>> use separate interfaces for. I am just c
a lot of the features you list below are only useful or usable at the
switching layer, and therefore not really fair when compared to what openbsd
can do. eg, the dhcp snooping is done on the switches at the client access
layer to prevent rouge dhcp servers on an l2 network. unless you put openbsd
which dells specifically? are you able to get a dmesg off it?
dlg
On 14/09/2009, at 6:47 AM, John Brahy wrote:
Hi,
I bought a couple new dells with Broadcom BCM5716 chips on the
motherboard
for network support but everytime I boot and it gets to the starting
network
it reboots on me.
An
i have some 960s floating around here, i'll see if i can give one of
them a go with openbsd in the next few days.
On 14/09/2009, at 12:06 PM, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Hi,
I bought a couple new dells with Broadcom BCM5716 chips on the
motherboard
for network support but everytime I boot and i
On 03/11/2009, at 12:24 PM, Erin O'Meara wrote:
I have Installed an OpenBSD 4.6 Server with Samba + Active Directory
+ Cups.
The OpenBSD Server is a Member Server in the Active Directory and
Everything
is working great.
I have read about automatic ID mapping using Winbind. I realize that
On 10/11/2009, at 7:30 PM, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> (on -current) While burning a cd with `cdio tao image.iso`,
> systat iostat/vmstat doesn't show the write speed/bytes on cd0.
> Is this intentional or known?
known.
cdio bypasses the block layer and talks directly to the device, so the k
On 14/11/2009, at 12:56 AM, Bret Lambert wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:35 PM, elias r. wrote:
>> Hey out there!
>> I started thinking about improving my C-programming knowledge, especially
>> towards OpenBSD (and unix in general) -programming as well as secure
>> programming.
>>
>> Does anyo
hi anders,
could you get me a full trace from ddb when the fault occurs? id also like the
output of 'cvs info if_pfsync.?' in src/sys/net in the tree you built this
kernel from?
cheers,
dlg
On 17/11/2009, at 11:07 PM, Anders Pettersson wrote:
> Hi
>
> We get kernel panics when we reboot either
can you get me a backtrace when the system panics? ive been trying to
reproduce this locally without success.
cheers,
dlg
On 13/10/2010, at 11:00 PM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm wondering how I could configure scsi I/O timeout in OpenBSD.
> I need to fiddle around with that since I'm
i put no-sync on connections that are specific to a firewall. for example,
there is no point syncing states for tcp connections that have one end
terminated on the firewall, so on my firewalls i put no-sync on connections
going to and from relayd. if you have a network on one firewall but not the
o
On 18/01/2011, at 11:25 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote:
>
> My november 21st i386.MP -current handles 1.3Mpps inbound and 1.3Mpps
outbound packet during rootkits attacks on one of our collocated costumer, on
an 80Mbps traffic, via a vlan interface. CPU is 1% idle, system still
responsive (I get to ssh-ed
either:
pass in log (all) on $int_if inet proto udp from $admin_pc to !$int_if \
port 33433 >< 33626 keep state tag mytracert
pass out log on $ext_if inet proto udp from $ext_if to any \
port 33433 >< 33626 keep state tagged mytracert
or:
pass in log (all) on $int_if inet proto udp from $admi
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 09:57:18PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 02:31:09PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:25:35PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> > > I am attempting to build a proof of concept of how to use vxla
7; active \
> from 192.168.4.0/30 to 192.168.4.0/30 \
> peer 192.168.3.111 \
> srcid server2.domain \
> iface sec0
>
> # cat /etc/hostname.sec0
> mtu 1446
> 192.168.4.2 192.168.4.1 netmask 0xfffc
> up
>
>
>
> I
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 07:21:38PM +0200, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to use OpenBSD as firewall for a configuration where every hosts is
> isolated.
cool.
> For example, let's say I have 1.0.0.0/24 subnet and 2000::/56 subnet.
>
> I want each host to have a single ip for ipv4, and a
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 01:24:46PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2024-09-28, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> > On Fri Sep 27, 2024 at 5:45 AM CEST, David Gwynne wrote:
> >>
> >> using a /32 on each host with a single shared gateway ip for the
> >> subnet should w
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:57:42PM +0200, Luca Di Gregorio wrote:
> I'm running 7.5, I see this alert:
>
> # ifconfig sec0 create
> # ifconfig sec0 tunnel 169.254.229.42/30 169.254.229.41
sorry, this should read:
# ifconfig sec0 inet 169.254.229.42/30 169.254.229.41
i just committed a fix to th
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 09:48:15AM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 11:17:45AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 09:57:18PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 02:31:09PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> >
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:05:37PM +0200, Luca Di Gregorio wrote:
> PublicIP1
> ---
> # cat /etc/hostname.vxlan3
> tunnel PublicIP1:4789 239.13.13.3
> parent gif0
> vnetid 13133
> tunnelttl 255
> mtu 1450
> up
>
> # cat /etc/hostname.gif0
> mtu 1480
> 10.13.11.2 10.13.11.1 netmask 255.255.
is, 4789 for every outcoming packets.
>
> Do you think it's possible to optimize in this way?
yes, but there are more useful optimisations that are a higher priority
for me to do first. ecmp for vxlan in our stack isnt going to give you a
speed increase today.
>
>
> Il giorn
201 - 291 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
