--On 09 August 2005 11:11 +0200, Stefan Sczekalla-Waldschmidt wrote:
for failover functionality - I'd like to use sasync too, but I'm
somewhat confused - do I have to wait for 3.8 for this feature or if I
can use the 3.7 Stable branch and make my own release to deploy. -
Or do I need to follow
--On 10 August 2005 18:09 +1000, David Crawshaw wrote:
On 10/08/2005, at 5:56 PM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
While building an (unsupported, i know) stripped down install, I
noticed that the larger binaries in /usr/sbin are all from BIND :
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1015716 May 22 10:11
--On 16 August 2005 01:54 -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
Assuming you don't have a provider requirement of using their
specified DSL modem, it may be possible to use OpenBSD as a
*replacement* for the DSL modem itself. I know we've got some degree
of ATM support but I don't know how well (or if)
--On 18 August 2005 13:03 +0200, Tim wrote:
1. I have a old computer that is slow and has little memory. But I
want to keep it updated with patches. I can't compile these patches
on the system but I could do it on another faster system. But how can
I later apply the compiled patches to the weak
I'm trying to connect a Windows XP Sp2 (yes I know) box to a Win2k
Server using PPTP across two firewalls. i.e.
Logical layout
[Win XP] IP/1723 GRE(47) [Firewall 1] - Internet
[Firewall 2]-- [Win2k PPTP endpoint]
Now for my first test Firewall 1 was a Linux 2.6.10 (ubuntu
On 2005/08/20 14:20:13, Adam Gleave wrote:
I'm really running on PPPoA, but it is converted by the modem from
PPPoE to PPPoA.
That's unlikely, there's a guide on the web which says that this
is what happens, but actually it's just running as a bridge and using
PPPoE to BT (which BT say they
--On 21 August 2005 17:44 +1000, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
What format(s) are acceptable for submitting minor changes to man
pages?
The few I've submitted have been to the input files, in the hope that
it gives jmc@ less to do by hand.
I assume unified diff - but against what? The man page
--On 21 August 2005 09:10 +, Adam Gleave wrote:
Given that there's a number of UK ISPs that will do at least a /30
for no extra charge, you might find it easier to use the router as a
straight (PPPoA) router, and give the OpenBSD box the next address
along...
The router doesn't support
--On 21 August 2005 10:44 +, Adam Gleave wrote:
On 21/08/05, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 21 August 2005 09:10 +, Adam Gleave wrote:
Given that there's a number of UK ISPs that will do at least a /30
for no extra charge, you might find it easier to use the router
--On 22 August 2005 12:37 +0200, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote:
In any case, my next little project will be to go through pf.conf
with a fine tooth comb until I find the error.
The best tool for debugging pf.conf is tcpdump, as described in
pflogd(8). Make sure any 'drop' rules
--On 22 August 2005 06:03 -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 11:49 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
If you don't already have something like 'pass quick on lo0' near
the start of your PF ruleset, you might like to add it.
Actually, as of 3.7 set skip on lo0 is the preferred
--On 23 August 2005 20:15 +1000, Steve Murdoch wrote:
without any joy. the winxp in my test case is behind a nat router
will this cause me grief ?
If the router has nat helpers for ipsec (e.g. speedtouch), try
disabling them in case they interfere. Otherwise, you'll need to give
some more
After assigning a default disklabel (to a blank disk), can I just
feed disklabel the partition information? ie, just this part:
pipe into disklabel -E, perhaps?
--On 23 August 2005 10:44 -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of
Will H. Backman
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 2:33 PM
To: Misc OpenBSD
Subject: Re: problem with rtw in hostap mode
-Original Message-
Can anyone confirm whether the db4 port is working on -current on
macppc at the moment?
I was trying to install cyrus, but it's hanging on ctl_cyrusdb -r at
startup.
Simplifying things I've tested with
/usr/local/share/examples/db4/ex_env.c which has also been hanging
sometimes when it
--On 23 August 2005 17:25 -0400, Jason Crawford wrote:
Secondly, it seems pretty pointless to setup pf on a single host.
It has it's uses - spamd, for one...
--On 23 August 2005 21:48 +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
Rebuild libdb with debugging enabled:
$ cd /usr/ports/databases/db/v4
$ make uninstall
$ DEBUG=-g make install
Thanks, that's helpful.
# gdb /tmp/ex_env
GNU gdb 6.3
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software,
--On 23 August 2005 18:26 -0400, David Hill wrote:
Is it possible to have fxp0 flag vlan0, then vlan0 flag carp0 that
the link is down?
yes, in -current. plus.html says: Make vlan(4) aware of the underlying
link state, and report that up to other interfaces layered on top.
--On 23 August 2005 21:48 +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 07:54:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Simplifying things I've tested with
/usr/local/share/examples/db4/ex_env.c which has also been hanging
sometimes when it does 'dbenv-open'.
Same problem here (with a four
--On 24 August 2005 10:37 +0200, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
pciide0:0:1: bus-master DMA error: missing interrupt, status=0x61
wd1a: device timeout reading fsbn 1489200 of 1489200-1489203 (wd1 bn
1489263; cn 1477 tn 7 sn 6), retrying
wd1: soft error (corrected)
wd1(pciide0:0:1): timeout
type:
On 2005/08/24 14:28:25, Genadijus Paleckis wrote:
well, from base system side I gues it will be minimal problems, but what
about ports ? because almost everyone using it.
If software segfaults because of this, it's because it's already
doing something wrong, and it could already be giving
--On 25 August 2005 09:04 +0100, Helio Santana wrote:
My VPN works fine with pf disabled, but when I enable PF... this is
the response
PING 192.168.6.102 (192.168.6.102): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No route to host
That either means 'No route to host' or 'blocked by PF'. Since you
turned
--On 25 August 2005 11:13 -0300, JoC#o Salvatti wrote:
I'd like to know where I could find informations about how to
configure bind to work under OpenBSD 3.7.
named.conf(5) and BIND 9 Administrator Reference Manual, which you
can find in /usr/share/doc/html/bind.
file master/example-int.com ;
Extra space between com and .
--On 25 August 2005 19:54 -0500, Qv6 wrote:
I have just tried to use the following wireless usb network adapters
with no luck. OpenBSD-3.7 does not recognize either:
The Belkin was added in June. Try a 3.8-beta snapshot.
RCS file: /data/cvs/OpenBSD/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ral.c,v
Working file:
--On 28 August 2005 10:22 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
A long time ago I added a little bios code to my pc
by programming and installing an eprom on a
post card. The code was executed at boot time before
most of the bios code was executed.
Is this still possible with current desktops?
Yes, it's
--On 29 August 2005 16:34 -0500, Tony Lambiris wrote:
Is there a way to compile something on i386 OpenBSD box to run on
amd64? or is there a sysctl option I am missing?
Cross-compiling between architectures is not supported, see list
archives for reasons why.
--On 31 August 2005 09:29 +0200, Roman Zilka wrote:
# export CFLAGS='-O3 -mcpu=athlon-xp -march=athlon-xp -mmmx
-msse -m3dnow -mfpmath=sse'
Don't do this with OpenBSD, it's not recommended or supported.
--On 04 September 2005 13:57 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A Netgear FS108 is doing it's job very well and also the support of
Netgear convinced me. As I bought the Switch it had a 5 year warenty
and a 3year warenty for the power suply.
The metal-cased Netgear FS105 and FS108 have been
--On 05 September 2005 12:17 +0200, Johan P. LindstrC6m wrote:
HP's ProCurve series are a bit on the steep side, though they come
with lifetime warranty, got two 2524 (managed) 10/100 and I haven't
seen any issues with them so far
I looked at some HP 2626 which seem like quite nice switches
--On 06 September 2005 11:29 +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
I am now trying to find out, what 'rule 267' should be and found
posts regarding 'pfctl -s rules'. My problem is, that rule number 267
has absolutely nothing to do with the line logged above.
# pfctl -sr -vv
--On 06 September 2005 10:16 +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
There is one thing I still don't understand. What effort is it to
deliver patches (not backports) longer than just a few month - given
that the overall amount of patches per release is low with OpenBSD
anyway... let's say you have
--On 06 September 2005 09:36 -0300, JoC#o Salvatti wrote:
I have a OpenBSD system acting as a firewall. When I use the top
command I see that the swap space is not being used.
Typically, one would hope that a firewall doesn't have to swap...
I'd like to know
if the swap space is only
--On 06 September 2005 15:13 +0200, Cristian Del Carlo wrote:
i am planning to use openbsd as mail server with sendmail and clamd
as antivirus on intel machine. What can i use to connect sendmail and
clamd?
/usr/ports/mail/smtp-vilter works nicely, but if users should normally
receive most
--On 07 September 2005 14:08 +0300, Tomas wrote:
Please, can someone give me a clue how to setup a vpn with
authentication.
I've set up a vpn between Windows clients and OpenBSD
server, everything works fine.
By itself 'vpn' can mean many things... tunnels over IPsec? PPTP?
unencrypted
--On 07 September 2005 15:28 +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
According to various documentations, this should be enough.
Unfortunately, it isn't and I am not a sendmail specialist:
include(`../m4/cf.m4')
define(`__OSTYPE__',`')
FEATURE(`nullclient', `myiphere')
--On 07 September 2005 10:40 -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
There are always ways, .. but I would not consider recommending such
sophisticated solutions for the basic user level of this poster.
If it's necessary to ask questions of this nature, perhaps running a
server automatically handing out
--On 07 September 2005 18:32 +0100, MikeG wrote:
If that is the case can anyone a way to get my new entries into
terminfo.db, or extract all the existing ones into the expanded
database format?
See /usr/src/share/termtypes/Makefile
Also what governs the width of pages generated by man(1)?
--On 07 September 2005 17:30 -0400, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
This takes the thread even OT, is the stealth mechanism built in,
or is there a special directive to be added?
It uses a pre-shared key, so it doesn't happen by default with TLS
(read about tls-auth in doco to learn how to enable
--On 08 September 2005 14:55 +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
If I understand correctly, pf has no 'forward' chain like netfiler
(which is probably by design).
I'm guessing at what netfilter 'forward chain' means here since
(presumably like many people here) I don't have much need to admin
--On 08 September 2005 16:32 +0200, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
$if_in=xl0
$if_out=xl1
pass in on $if_in keep state
pass out on $if_out keep state
Ok, let's stick to that example. Imagine a firewall having three
interfaces connecting Internet, LAN and DMZ. When I would like to
allow SMTP
--On 09 September 2005 10:38 +0200, Eric Dillenseger wrote:
You may want to check in /etc/ppp/ppp.link{up|down} or
/etc/rc.conf(.local). Do you start ppp in /etc/rc ? as I can see, it
starts before /etc/rc initializes the network and then another time
Maybe in rc.local and hostname.tun0.
--On 12 September 2005 16:24 -0500, Tony Lambiris wrote:
We have some motherboards with (what we think) are the same chips and
revisions with the same hard drives, but some drives are being
detected as DMA and others as ATA133. Here is an example:
pciide0 at pci0 dev 17 function 1 VIA VT82C571
--On 13 September 2005 11:05 -0300, Leonardo Marques wrote:
I wanna how to lock a user in his home, he cannot see any other
directory, just his home. Someone how can i do this?
stsh?
--On 13 September 2005 17:39 +0200, -f wrote:
if it causes Col's on half duplex, and then causes Ierr's on full
duplex, then what is the problem? the modem or openbsd?
there isn't a problem with collisions, they are correct and expected
behaviour with half-duplex ethernet. the devices know
--On 16 September 2005 14:14 +0800, Robert Storey wrote:
Hello folks. I'm trying to use SpamAssassin (not Spamd) on OpenBSD
3.7. I installed using the port mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin.
Try the package, in case something went wrong with your port-building.
It's not in the path, and I scoured
--On 17 September 2005 09:39 +1000, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
My question is: Will this be a relaible set-up for both purposes?
Usually we have the console port running 9600 no handshakes. I'll bet
RDP looks very sad on that setting.
You probably know or can guess most of this anyway but it
--On 19 September 2005 20:24 -0400, Alex Kirk wrote:
wi0 at pci0 dev 12 function 0 National Datacomm Corp NCP130 Rev
A2 rev 0x01: irq 9 wi0: PRISM2 HWB3163 rev.B, Firmware 0.3.0
(primary), 1.7.1 (station), address 00:80:c6:e3:72:2c
It's ancient but it should work.
It was the most current
--On 20 September 2005 14:45 +0200, Johan P. LindstrC6m wrote:
not confirm if there where revisions released of those cards. Now this
differs from what I read on the manpage where supported chipsets are
AR5210, AR5211 and AR5212.
At Atheros site (http://www.atheros.com/pt/index.html) the
On 2005/09/19 14:30:14, Joe . wrote:
I would check to make sure the nic is negotiating properly. It might
be half duplex instead of full or something flakey etc. Check the
output of ifconfig.
That would show up in netstat -ni (Vinicius says he looked there).
I have just been looking at a
--On 21 September 2005 06:21 +, Edy Purnomo wrote:
Recently, my OBSD 3.4 can not do any of port installation.
Please advice.
Looks like you're trying to use -current ports on an old OS, which
won't work. A huge amount of work has been done on ports/package
infrastructure between 3.7 and
--On 22 September 2005 16:52 -0400, Chris wrote:
I am trying to follow the stable branch, so updated my CVS for src,
ports and X like so:
# cd /usr
# cvs -d$CVSROOT up -Pd*
That's -current. Add -rOPENBSD_3_7 for 3.7-stable, or follow
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html updating beyond
--On 22 September 2005 13:10 -0500, eric wrote:
I have a Dell 2650 with an Adaptec controller. This machine is
constantly crashing due to either a high load or some sort of a
kernel panic.
I know that Adaptec support was dropped in 3.7, and I wish I didn't
have this piece of shit to deal with.
--On 23 September 2005 15:05 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only question is what if I traceroute to you, find out the IP
number of your upstream router? Then I make a bunch of connection
attempts to your IP but forge the packets to make them look like they
came from your upstream.
The
--On 24 September 2005 08:53 +0700, Budhi Setiawan wrote:
1. how important to make our system (OS and packages) always
up-to-date ( except with security reason of course ), because some
people says you should update your system at least once a year
Given the ease of upgrading OpenBSD, and
--On 24 September 2005 11:27 +0200, Simon Strandgaard wrote:
I have openbsd 3.7 on an old P133.
Connecting with SSH to the box takes near 20 seconds.
Any ideas on how to make it go faster?
Depending on your needs, either read about ControlMaster in
ssh_config(5) and -M in ssh(1), or use the
--On 24 September 2005 13:31 +0100, ed wrote:
What they did was to exploit gzip, I'm fairly certain. I could not
apt-get of course and thus left helpless. I no longer have faith in
user passwords. I do my best to prevent people using common user names
(besides myself who uses 'ed' of course,
--On 25 September 2005 05:30 -0800, Szechuan Death wrote:
Question: Is there any really outstanding reason why a suitably-
licensed database or fork thereof, e.g. PostgreSQL, couldn't be fully
integrated into the OpenBSD distribution?
Just a thought, you might find it easier to make a case
--On 26 September 2005 07:47 -0500, James Harless wrote:
One thing to check, make sure the timeout you have specified for the
milter is long enough for it to actually scan the attachment.
Also check the smtp-vilter backend timeouts. The default in
/etc/smtp-vilter/{clamd,spamd,savse}.conf,
--On 26 September 2005 14:00 -0400, Chris Smith wrote:
Both Jacek's book and the pf faq,
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html, state that queueing is
only useful for packets in the outbound direction.
Yet, I find examples that show inbound traffic being sent to queues.
..
What am I
--On 26 September 2005 15:07 -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
There could be a virtual store that lists things that are known
to be well supported by OpenBSD
...and when some idiot vendor changes chips without changing product
code, what then?
--On 26 September 2005 15:21 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have thought about a store like this for about a year,but i
suspect a virtual store wouldn't quite cut it due to the
aforementioned chipset changing garbage. it would be
interesting to open such a store from both to make it easier
--On 27 September 2005 19:44 +0900, Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar wrote:
I did
# cd /usr
# cp -i * /usr1
Something wrong?
This doesn't copy permissions. A command like pax(1) or cpio(1) is good
at preserving these.
After reboot I can login as my non-root account and also with root
account. But I
--On 27 September 2005 03:04 -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
(an idiot who bought a MegaRAID ATA 133-2 thinking it would work
with OpenBSD since MegaRAID was listed as supported)
The new http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#38 suggests it works too,
and ami(4) and 'supported hardware' lists don't
How much RAM might I want in order to accept full views from 2-3 peers?
Thanks.
--On 29 September 2005 17:17 +1000, 2ds wrote:
Firstly I'd like to set up an openbsd router to send packets out two
different internet connections
based on port. this seems like a simple RDR to me but my attempts at
this have failed.
Read about route-to and reply-to in pf.conf(5), they're
--On 29 September 2005 10:23 -0400, Bill wrote:
Phooey on them. I was not aware that DHCP servers sent out any sort
of advertisement or signal to override other equiptment.
dhcpd.conf(5) option authoritative /might/ have some bearing.
--On 29 September 2005 14:00 -0600, Whyzzi wrote:
Side Note: I would ignore this path completely if someone can offer up
a native OpenBSD way of running x86 32bit diskless thin clients
connecting to a native AMD64 XWindows terminal server ;) .
What's the actual problem you're having? A
--On 29 September 2005 15:52 -0600, Whyzzi wrote:
tcpdump. ARGH! Why the hell didn't I think of that? Currently I'm
;)
playing around with a couple of pre-built pxe loadable distrobutions -
currently the one in question if ThinBSD (based on FreeBSD,
thinstation is quite complicated, and
--On 29 September 2005 20:36 -0500, J Moore wrote:
Can someone tell me if and when the clamav in the -stable tree is
going to have the security flaw patched?
On Wednesday just gone.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/security/clamav/Makefile
--On 30 September 2005 01:00 +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
reasonable price tag. I am uncertain what chipset they use, might be
nForce, might be Via. As long as both GigEs and the SATA stuff
works, and there's no other showstopper, I don't care.
--On 29 September 2005 20:54 -0700, Richard P. Koett wrote:
This machine has two interfaces - 'ne3' facing the Internet and 'rl0'
facing a small (3 computer) internal network. I am *assuming* that the
log entries pertain to the external interface but tcpdump is not
broken nic somewhere? bad
--On 01 October 2005 04:43 -0500, Travis H. wrote:
Ah, but the matching engine doesn't have to traverse the whole rule
list that way. Unless pf is doing something really tricky, every
packet will have to traverse every firewall rule without use of
quicks.
huh? Before any rules are evaluated,
--On 01 October 2005 08:50 -0500, Travis H. wrote:
huh? Before any rules are evaluated, the filter checks whether the
packet matches any state. If it does, the packet is passed without
evaluation of any rules. - pf.conf(5)
Yeah, I neglected stateful matching. I should have said that every
--On 02 October 2005 06:07 +1000, Brian McKerr wrote:
Texas Instruments ACX111 rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 12 function 0 not
configured
That's not an ath, they've changed the chipset to TI (non-open,
unfortunately). Unfortunately wireless chipsets change often, TI and
Marvell are appearing from
--On 02 October 2005 20:38 +0200, Jernej Vodopivec wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with asus wl-138g wlan pci card? I've
only found model 130g at supported hardware..
Google: wl-138g chipset. First few hits say 'Marvell' - this is
undocumented/unsupported (but increasingly common).
--On 03 October 2005 20:00 +0100, Francisco Jose Nina Rente wrote:
There is any way that i can limit the number of connections between a
computer (on the LAN) and the router ?
Yes, see pf.conf(5) - stateful tracking options. It's been mentioned
here rather often...
--On 03 October 2005 17:19 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
Add to this the fact that it works, to/from FreeBSD to the original
Linux on the Zaurus, using cdce on both ends.
Client (aka target) mode is where the Z acts as a USB peripheral, not
as a host. afaik you need the Linux distributed with
--On 04 October 2005 12:28 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
Note that you will need a Zaurus USB host cable for this, these
don't come with the Zaurus and have to be purchased seperately.
Zhost cable, or I guess a 'digital camera mini USB lead' with AF-AF
gender changer might do the trick.
Well,
nat on !($int_if) from $lan_net to any - gateway_addresses \
round-robin sticky-address
That changes the source address on the packets, but doesn't affect
where they're sent. Without reply-to/route-to, the route taken by an
outgoing packet is dependent only on the destination address,
--On 06 October 2005 16:00 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
If the Soekris did not come with ethernet chipsets which are just
slightly over the bar of rl(4), the wimpy processor in the machine
might be able to cope.
Throughput is only marginally better using an em in the pci slot of a
4801. I
experiences setting it up? I've got my eye on the Matrox Millennium
P750 card, but I can't find anything on any kind of support for
OpenBSD (I'm not looking to run Linux, Solaris, or even FreeBSD all of
which seem to have some sort of support).
Their old cards used to be a good choice for
--On 06 October 2005 16:11 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
I had used Matrox cards exclusively up until Parhelia was released
however long ago. I think my Millenium II card is still chugging along
in a closet somewhere. From what I can tell on Matrox's site, the
Parhelia and the Millenium P750 are
--On 11 October 2005 12:21 +0200, Marcin Wilk wrote:
Audio play too fast on AC97 onboard
Can anyone suggest some solution for me please ?
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2004-01/0764.html
--On 11 October 2005 12:39 -0400, Andrew Atrens wrote:
Can someone point me to the cvs commit that fixes 'hlt hlt'. I'm
thinking (hoping) it could easily be applied on top of 3.7 Release.
google hlt hlt openbsd gives this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvsm=111859519015510w=2
--On 11 October 2005 17:15 +0200, David Elze wrote:
Apart from blocking ports I just see two possibilities:
[..]
You might investigate how many source states users would normally use
for permitted protocols, how many states are involved with
non-permitted use, and (ab?)use max-src-states
--On 11 October 2005 11:31 -0400, James Mackinnon wrote:
I created a file that has the following info and made it executable to
root and the wheel group and no access to everyone. This file sits in
/usr/local/bin with the name logkick
# !/bin/sh
# this file is used to roll over the PFLog file
--On 14 October 2005 08:32 +1000, Dave Harrison wrote:
Here's my problem, I have a remote machine that has two links, one is
high bandwidth but has bad latency, the other has low bandwidth but
good latency.
pf.conf(5), look at 'route-to' and 'reply-to'. Use PF rules to send ssh
over the fast
--On 13 October 2005 17:50 -0400, Andrew Atrens wrote:
I know in FreeBSD/DragonFly I have a couple of tools to check to
see if it's being engaged - hifnstats and cryptostats
(in /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto), but I'm not sure if the equivalent
exists for OpenBSD.
You'll see something in the
--On 14 October 2005 09:02 +1000, Dave Harrison wrote:
Here's my problem, I have a remote machine that has two links, one
is high bandwidth but has bad latency, the other has low bandwidth
but good latency.
pf.conf(5), look at 'route-to' and 'reply-to'. Use PF rules to send
ssh over the fast
On 2005/10/14 16:41:22, Graham Toal wrote:
- Using the 3.7 ports tree on 3.6 is not recommended.
The only install disk I have is 3.6.
Any reason not to use cd37.iso?
I'd rather forget about packages and use ports for everything
(Speaking as someone compiling ports for -current on another
--On 16 October 2005 11:04 -0400, Mike wrote:
[3] Check carefully, many of these boards only support RNG
Very carefully - you can't just go by model number; this was on
undeadly:
VIA is annoying because they don't say which particular CPU is on
those EPIA mobos. The reason I'm saying
You could always step back in time and buy a 2.1 CD (or the whole set,
if you're feeling rich) ...though installing even 3.7 feels like
stepping back in time now (:
--On 17 October 2005 07:41 -0500, Benjamin A. Collins wrote:
I got a pci wireless yesterday. After the
installation, the system reported that the following
message:-
rtw0 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 Realtek 8185 rev 0x20:
irq 11
rtw0: ver RTL8185,
rtw0: could not recall EEPROM in 1us
rtw0:
On 2005/10/22 21:05:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I see no difference to simple ASCII-Textfiles anymore
Ahh, do you know of a nice simple console-mode pdf viewer then?
--On 23 October 2005 11:29 +0200, LukC!E! Macura wrote:
When I look into BIOS, there is no possibility to do good irq routing.
BIOS groups almost all devices to irq3 :(
try a .mp kernel (even if you have 1 processor).
--On 23 October 2005 08:30 -0400, Darrel wrote:
My ruleset is basic, about like:
about like isn't nearly as good as directly including the whole file.
to be complete you might also include 'ifconfig', 'brconfig -a' and
'netstat -rn -finet' to give us a better idea of the network (if you
--On 23 October 2005 16:52 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
generally with a filtering bridge, you would want to pass all
traffic on one of the interfaces ('set skip on XX' or a 'pass on
XX' rule), and just make rules apply to the other interface.
Whether or not this is what you're doing,
--On 24 October 2005 13:34 +0200, Beck Zoltan Gyula wrote:
I must install a file server so I need minimal 2T disk space. So I
need to choose an other operating system :(
2T is a lot of files to put in a single directory. And of course, where
you work with multiple directories, each can be on
--On 25 October 2005 05:10 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'd like to do is have my TERM environment variable set to wsvt25
for all users forever, and XTERM set to xterm-xfree86 for all users
forever.
The environment variable is still called TERM in X.
I've grepped through /etc and I
1 - 100 of 7843 matches
Mail list logo
