Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-07-01 Thread Dave Chapman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello Dave, > > how do I know the result of the mplexed mpg file will never takes over > the 10.08Mbit/s limit for DVDs? I know tried to burn the DVD with AC3 > tone and this time the peak bit-rame and the audio rat are under 10.08 > Mbit. At the beginning sound and vide

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-07-01 Thread mjpeg
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Dave Chapman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >INFO: [mplex] Average bit-rate : 7173600 bits/sec > >INFO: [mplex] Peak bit-rate: 8804400 bits/sec > >INFO: [mplex] BUFFERING min 15 Buf max 139661 > >INFO: [mplex] MUX STATUS: no under-runs detected. > >

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-30 Thread Dave Chapman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >INFO: [mplex] Average bit-rate : 7173600 bits/sec >INFO: [mplex] Peak bit-rate: 8804400 bits/sec >INFO: [mplex] BUFFERING min 15 Buf max 139661 >INFO: [mplex] MUX STATUS: no under-runs detected. > > So peak bit-rate is OK. No it isn't. 8.8Mbit/s f

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-30 Thread mjpeg
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Dave Chapman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > $ sox -V > > sox: Version 12.17.7 > > Checking the sox ChangeLog, I found this: > > sox-12.17.8 > --- > o "-x" option was being ignored since 12.17.7. > > So it looks like a bug in 12.17.7 - you should upgrad

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-30 Thread Dave Chapman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > $ sox -V > sox: Version 12.17.7 Checking the sox ChangeLog, I found this: sox-12.17.8 --- o "-x" option was being ignored since 12.17.7. So it looks like a bug in 12.17.7 - you should upgrade to 12.17.8 and that should fix it. > I now swapped the bytes my

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-30 Thread mjpeg
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Oliver Seufer wrote: > > > > 1. sox NAME.wav -t raw -x -s -w -c2 -r48000 NAME.lpcm > > > > 2. mplex -S 0 -f 8 -V -o NAME.mpg NAME.lpcm NAME.m2v > > > >It make no different if I also use "-L 48000:2:16" > > > > 3. Try to play this

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-29 Thread Trent Piepho
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Oliver Seufer wrote: > > > 1. sox NAME.wav -t raw -x -s -w -c2 -r48000 NAME.lpcm > > > 2. mplex -S 0 -f 8 -V -o NAME.mpg NAME.lpcm NAME.m2v > > >It make no different if I also use "-L 48000:2:16" > > > 3. Try to play this file with mplayer and xine. Video is OK, but Sound >

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-29 Thread Oliver Seufer
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Dave Chapman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hallo, > > > > I think there has to be a bug in the mplex tool with lpcm. That is what I > > have > > done: > > > > 1. sox NAME.wav -t raw -x -s -w -c2 -r48000 NAME.lpcm > > 2. mplex -S 0 -f 8 -V -o NAME.mpg NAME.lpcm NAME.

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-29 Thread Oliver Seufer
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Dave Chapman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I tried version mjpegtools-1.6.2 and mjpegtools-1.6.3-rc1. Both have this > > problem. > > Try the current CVS version - I submitted a patch to fix this bug which > was committed after the release of 1.6.3-rc1. I just tried

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-29 Thread mjpeg
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Dave Chapman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Dave Chapman wrote: > > > > > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Hallo, > >>> > >>>I think there has to be a bug in the mplex tool with lpcm. That is what > >>>I have > >>>done: > >>> > >

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-29 Thread Dave Chapman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Dave Chapman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo, I think there has to be a bug in the mplex tool with lpcm. That is what I have done: 1. sox NAME.wav -t raw -x -s -w -c2 -r48000 NAME.lpcm 2. mplex -S 0 -f 8 -V -o NAME.mpg NAME.lpcm NA

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-29 Thread mjpeg
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Dave Chapman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hallo, > > > > I think there has to be a bug in the mplex tool with lpcm. That is what I > > have > > done: > > > > 1. sox NAME.wav -t raw -x -s -w -c2 -r48000 NAME.lpcm > > 2. mplex -S 0 -f 8 -V -o NAME.mpg NAME.lpcm NAME.

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-29 Thread Dave Chapman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hallo, > > I think there has to be a bug in the mplex tool with lpcm. That is what I have > done: > > 1. sox NAME.wav -t raw -x -s -w -c2 -r48000 NAME.lpcm > 2. mplex -S 0 -f 8 -V -o NAME.mpg NAME.lpcm NAME.m2v >It make no different if I also use "-L 48000:2:16" > 3

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-28 Thread mjpeg
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Dave Chapman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I tried version mjpegtools-1.6.2 and mjpegtools-1.6.3-rc1. Both have this > > problem. > > Try the current CVS version - I submitted a patch to fix this bug which > was committed after the release of 1.6.3-rc1. I now tried t

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-28 Thread Dave Chapman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I tried version mjpegtools-1.6.2 and mjpegtools-1.6.3-rc1. Both have this > problem. Try the current CVS version - I submitted a patch to fix this bug which was committed after the release of 1.6.3-rc1. Dave. --- SF

[Mjpeg-users] mplex and lpcm bug?

2005-06-28 Thread mjpeg
Hallo, I think there has to be a bug in the mplex tool with lpcm. That is what I have done: 1. sox NAME.wav -t raw -x -s -w -c2 -r48000 NAME.lpcm 2. mplex -S 0 -f 8 -V -o NAME.mpg NAME.lpcm NAME.m2v It make no different if I also use "-L 48000:2:16" 3. Try to play this file with mplayer and xi