Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-19 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Thursday, September 13, 2007 at 20:49:06 -0700 On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Stan Gammons wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 19:29 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: You should be able to fetch the CVS version - just ignore the mpeg2enc executable (save your old one). Better CVS

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-19 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Christian Ebert wrote: Are you sure? I still get output like No, I am not sure. I had forgotten that mpeg2enc is a wrapper around the loadable module libmpeg2encpp If I save the libmpeg2encpp.* for mjpegtools-1.9.0rc1 as well and copy the libraries back

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-14 Thread Mark Heath
On 14/09/2007, at 3:23 PM, David McNab wrote: I am thinking about doing something more intelligent than line doubling. (maybe adaptive blending) Oh yes, please do! :) And making better support for different chroma subsampling, but maybe next week. Less urgent, since many yuv4mpeg tools

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-14 Thread Stan Gammons
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 20:49 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: if that doesn't work then I guess just leave the video interlaced That will work. Actually I was wondering if the over compression problem has been fixed in CVS. The older version of mjpegtools I have is from March of this year.

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-14 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Stan Gammons wrote: Actually I was wondering if the over compression problem has been fixed in CVS. The older version of mjpegtools I have is from March of this Nope - it has not. There is some (small) hope that the situation will improve but it's a ways

[Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-13 Thread Mark Heath
I haven't looked thoroughly into this but it appears that the version of yuvdeinterlace crashes on 480 height files, while works fine on 576 height files. I'm not sure which version I am using, the tool doesn't have any version information, it is the Motion-Compensating-Deinterlacer. I

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-13 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Mark Heath wrote: I haven't looked thoroughly into this but it appears that the version of yuvdeinterlace crashes on 480 height files, while works fine on 576 height files. yuvdeinterlace has had buffer allocation/addressing issues - in one case would

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-13 Thread David McNab
There's an alternative implementation of yuvdeinterlace, unfortunately with the same name, at: http://silicontrip.net/~mark/lavtools/ This version performs lossless deinterlacing (extracting the fields, and generating a stream with both fields set to double the frame rate). It also has a

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-13 Thread Stan Gammons
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 19:29 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: You should be able to fetch the CVS version - just ignore the mpeg2enc executable (save your old one). Better CVS instructions on how one does that? All the mjpegtools source I have is pre-broken mpeg2enc. I'm not a CVS

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-13 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Stan Gammons wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 19:29 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: You should be able to fetch the CVS version - just ignore the mpeg2enc executable (save your old one). Better CVS instructions on how one does that? All the mjpegtools source I

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-13 Thread Mark Heath
On 14/09/2007, at 12:50 PM, David McNab wrote: There's an alternative implementation of yuvdeinterlace, unfortunately with the same name, at: http://silicontrip.net/~mark/lavtools/ :-) yeah that's my version. It was for non interlace aware temporal filters, such as my original yuvafps

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-13 Thread David McNab
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 14:27 +1000, Mark Heath wrote: :-) yeah that's my version. Ohh, oops! I am thinking about doing something more intelligent than line doubling. (maybe adaptive blending) Oh yes, please do! :) And making better support for different chroma subsampling, but maybe