Good riddance...
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Per Cederberg
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:57 PM
To: MochiKit
Subject: [mochikit] Removal of Dojo and JSAN support
Just wondering -- is there anyone out there using
Congrats and thanks to everyone involved for all of the hard work that goes
into maintaining this stable toolkit!
Jason Bunting
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Per Cederberg
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 4:32 AM
it is worth.
Jason Bunting
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Per Cederberg
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 2:29 PM
To: MochiKit
Subject: [mochikit] Re: MochiKit.DOM.isChildNode and isParent
Noone has opinions on this?
Cheers
On Friday, October 10, 2008 at 11:33PM Bob Ippolito wrote:
If you'd like to fix it then I don't see why the patch would be rejected.
Sounds good, I will do just that.
Thanks,
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
On Saturday, October 11, 2008 at 2:50AM Per Cederberg wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Jason Bunting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well... I think your case here is pretty uncommon. This is because the
__dom__() function is really supposed to create a *new* DOM node.
Otherwise
That's it huh?
No more discussion on this? I guess I am smoking crack...
Jason
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Bunting
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:50 AM
To: 'Per Cederberg'; 'MochiKit'
Subject: [mochikit
...
If this is merely work that needs to be done, I would be willing to do it. I
simply want to see if and why others don't see the inconsistencies that I
do.
Thanks again,
Jason Bunting
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Jason Bunting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if I am up
MochiKit.DOM functions, but can't remove it just as easily.
Am I missing something here?
Jason Bunting
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
MochiKit group.
To post to this group, send email to mochikit
Arnar Birgisson wrote:
To be clear, I'm basically asking the mailing list: Would you be OK
with it if the following selectors would stop working?
a[fakeattribute] - i.e. checking for presence of attribute
p[lang|=en] - membership test of hyphen-seperated string
collections
you can provide us more details?
Jason Bunting
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
MochiKit group.
To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
is missing in your opinion?)
I was wondering the same thing...
Jason Bunting
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
MochiKit group.
To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com
is this failing in? If you want additional examples, even though
your example seems to work just fine for me, there are a few on the
documentation page:
http://www.mochikit.com/doc/html/MochiKit/DOM.html
Jason Bunting
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL
do know is that I
love using this library and have a vested interest in keeping it around and
building support around it (makes it an easier sell to clients that hear about
nothing but jQuery, Dojo, YUI and prototype/scriptaculous).
Hope everyone has a nice weekend!
Jason Bunting
ideas aren't
implemented; rather, it will be because of a conscious choice based on an
actual need.
Jason Bunting
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
MochiKit group.
To post to this group, send email
-
granted, a better community of users would be nice, as far as developing
reusable widgets and such (I develop niche stuff and have to roll my own
regardless), but other than that, I don't see the library itself as missing
anything. As your last goodwill effort, provide some useful feedback.
Jason
Why wouldn't you just use $$(.someClass) rather than
getElementsByTagAndClassName(null, someClass)?
Just curious...
Jason Bunting
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of machineghost
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:29 AM
of using MochiKit
may not be the same as others, so I don't see a reason to change things. I
rarely use the functions you mention, so their longs names are no problem
for me.
Just my opinion, for what little it is worth.
Jason Bunting
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto
to prevent this from happening or do I need to accept that I
will have to write this code with the lambda?
Thanks,
Jason Bunting
_
Making the world a better place one message at a time.
http://www.imtalkathon.com/?source
.
Jason Bunting
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Per Cederberg
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 7:33 AM
To: MochiKit
Subject: [mochikit] Re: Combine scripts to single file
packed/MochiKit/MochiKit.js
Cheers,
/Per
sell the idea of using MK to those around me.
MochiKit port of ThickBox 2.1:
http://www.sapientdevelopment.com/dotnetnuke/downloads/Mochikit/MochiKitThic
kBox.zip
Jason Bunting
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Gardner
Sent
isn't that great or the
class wasn't designed to highlight its strengths.
Jason Bunting
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
MochiKit group.
To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com
To what end do you want to get at the text? If you simply want to grab it,
use scrapeText()...
Jason
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JS
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 8:53 AM
To: MochiKit
Subject: [mochikit] Walk child
On 10/16/07, troels knak-nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/16/07, Daniel Fetchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Five months ago someone posted a list of blocking bugs:
On May 15, 9:57 pm, sayrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://trac.mochikit.com/ticket/113
is
very specific to the client hitting your page. If you are creating a site
for use by people that may not have that setting setup that way, you will
want to stick with the timestamp hack.
Jason Bunting
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Without your providing the code so that it can be duplicated, I am not sure
how much help you are going to receive
Jason Bunting
From: John Lorance [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MochiKit mochikit@googlegroups.com
Subject: [mochikit] Callbacks work when Firebug is turned on but not when
off
, but I can't get that to work
right. According to the sortables documentation page, other options are
passed to the Draggables and Droppables objects created. Refer to
MochiKit.DragAndDrop for more information.
Hope that helps,
Jason Bunting
-Original Message-
From: mochikit
and you will see what is
provided; MochiKit has very little in its API that is as task-specific as
form validation helpers, instead providing generic helps.
Jason Bunting
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.0/961
within
MK and whether anyone has already started using this library with MK. The
full source is 33K but I was able to get it down to 9K with an obfuscation
tool.
Jason Bunting
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database
Well, if your function is called myFunction and you are *really* calling
addLoadEvent like this: addLoadEvent(myFunction()); then your problem is
simple: you need to call addLoadEvent like this: addLoadEvent(myFunction);
Notice the difference?
Jason Bunting
_
From: mochikit
Wow - either no one really knows how to help me or this list is even deader
than I thought.
Guess I will have to become an expert on the internals of MK to get this
figured out...
:)
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
AM
To: Jason Bunting
Cc: JasonBunting; MochiKit
Subject: [mochikit] Re: onUpdate doesn't work for Sortable?
Hi Jason,
On 6/25/07, Jason Bunting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow - either no one really knows how to help me or this list is even
deader
than I thought.
Sorry, I was hoping
Hello? Can anyone help me out here?
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Bunting
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 3:18 PM
To: mochikit@googlegroups.com
Subject: [mochikit] parseQueryString bug?
If the url of the page
when present; is there
another way to do this? Is my use of document.URL incorrect? Currently I am
working around this with:
parseQueryString(document.URL.split(#)[0]);
Thanks,
Jason Bunting
_
Communicate instantly! Use your
That works, thanks!
Jason
From: Thomas Hervé [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MochiKit mochikit@googlegroups.com
Subject: [mochikit] Re: Color.fromBackground broken in IE 7?
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:08:17 -0800
I checked in a workaround in revision 1225.
Can you verify it corrects your problem ?
On the wiki at http://trac.mochikit.com/wiki/connectOnce there is this
implementation for a function that mimics 'connect' except it disconnects
after the signal fires once (copied from wiki):
function connectOnce(src, signal, dst, func) {
var S = MochiKit.Signal
var d
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jorge Godoy
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:03 PM
Subject: [mochikit] MochiKitThickBox + IE (6.0 and 7.0)
Anybody here using MochiKitThickBox? I'm having problems with IE 6 and IE
7
Jorge Godoy writes:
Jason Bunting [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jorge Godoy on Thursday, November 16, 2006 at 8:25 AM wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
var newTable = DIV({'id':'action-place'},FORM({},TABLE({'class':
'small-font','style':'margin-left:14em
Jorge Godoy writes:
Jason Bunting [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jorge Godoy on Thursday, November 16, 2006 at 8:25 AM wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
var newTable = DIV({'id':'action-place'},FORM({},TABLE({'class':
'small-font','style':'margin-left:14em
On 10/30/06, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/06, Jason Bunting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MochiKit advertises that one of the greatest things about it is the
documentation and the accuracy thereof, as well as the fact that it is
current with what is currently being
has already done something similar or know of something that may help I
Googled around a bit but didnt find anything much.
Jason Bunting
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MochiKit group. To post
On 10/31/06, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finite state machines don't really have much to do with the language
you're implementing them in. It's just a concept.
I understand that...
You might find some inspiration from Python FSM implementations,
but it's pretty trivial to
On 10/31/06, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/06, Jason Bunting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/06, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finite state machines don't really have much to do with the language
you're implementing them in. It's just a concept.
I
://www.sapientdevelopment.com/downloads/Mochikit/MochiKitThickBox.zip
Short, useless blog post about it here: http://jasonbunting.com/blahg/PermaLink,guid,297d24b0-f5e8-47d1-82e2-1804133fc6bf.aspx
If anyone improves it, I would love to have the changes.
Thanks,
Jason Bunting
-Original Message-
From: Beau Hartshorne
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 10:58 AM
To: MochiKit
Subject: [mochikit] .Cookie or .Storage?
I'd like to add a nice Cookie interface to MochiKit. Working with
them manually sucks, but they're important for Ajax applications.
Should we
And I can only get clear() to work. I try a simple javascript command:
writeIn(hello) as in the video demo, and I get an error writeIn is
not defined... What am I doing wrong?
It is *not* writeIn(), it is writeln(), and it works just fine.
Jason
--
No virus found in this outgoing
To quote, in part, from the MochiKit site, in response to
the rhetorical question, Which version should I get? :
We
recommend that you use the development version (and join the MochiKit mailing
list!) when developing your applications.
Once you're
ready to deploy, it's usually time
-Original Message-
From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ChrisH
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 7:12 PM
To: MochiKit
Subject: [mochikit] Re: Is anyone working on autocomplete for MochiKit?
snip
Is everyone else layering scriptaculous on top of
Thanks,
Jason Bunting
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MochiKit group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
execution, look down
at the IE status bar and see if the error has shown up or not - if it has,
the bad line of code was before the alert, otherwise it was after. This is
tedious, but works well in those cases where you are banging your head
against the wall over and over.
Jason Bunting
--
No virus
to the MochiKit community.
snip
Hmm, looks good, though the last thing I want to have open on my system is
yet another tool - you guys thinking of offering any integration with Visual
Studio? :P
I will play around with it though!
Jason Bunting
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked
, if I grab that element by the id (foo1) and iterate
over all of the keys and values of that node, the value of the tagName
attribute (as well as the other two I mentioned) shows the value I expect. Am I
missing something obvious (or not so obvious)?
Thanks,
Jason Bunting
tart=fileopen type=text useMap=""
value= vrml="" vspace=0 width=0/
In FF:
input
autocomplete=off id=ADDL1_Input
readonly=readonly style=border: medium none ; margin: 0px;
padding: 0px; height: 16px; type=text/
This is driving me crazy I am
On Jul 5, 2006, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Jason Bunting wrote:
var textbox = INPUT({type:text,
id:MyTextboxId,autocomplete:off, readonly:readonly});
In FF, I get exactly what I expect, but in IE 6, the textbox is not
readonly. Anyone happen to know why
On Jul 5, 2006, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:19 AM,
Jason Bunting wrote:
var textbox =
INPUT({type:text,
id:MyTextboxId,autocomplete:off,
readonly:readonly});
In FF, I get exactly what
I expect, but in IE 6, the textbox is not
readonly. Anyone happen
On Jul 5, 2006, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Jason Bunting wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Jason Bunting wrote:
var textbox = INPUT({type:text,
id:MyTextboxId,autocomplete:off, readonly:readonly});
In FF, I
it should be easy.
Thanks,
Jason Bunting
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MochiKit group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Where is a good place to learn about
closures?
From:
mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Ippolito
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 1:35
PM
To: Sean De La Torre
Cc: MochiKit
Subject: [mochikit] Re: escapeHTML
not working as stated
Yeah, don't
FYI, I get the same thing as well in FF
and IE on WinXP.
From:
mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wei Litao
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:33
AM
To: Beau Hartshorne
Cc: MochiKit
Subject: [mochikit] Re: why the
interpreter demo can't use help()
58 matches
Mail list logo
