[mochikit] Re: Is MochiKit Production?

> > Thanks for the quick and elaborate response. Dojo's lack of proper > > documentation bothers me. I think MochiKit is what I will use. > > Lack of proper documentation? You mean like: > > http://manual.dojotoolkit.org/index.html > ? Considering that manual just went live December 22nd

[mochikit] Re: MOCHIKIT VISUAL

Try reading the documentation for it: http://www.mochikit.com/doc/html/MochiKit/Visual.html Everything you need to know about it is present on that page, from what I can see Jason > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jose R

[mochikit] Re: Mochikit Vs Prototype - For begginers

t very reason - to be read and typically it is bad form to not read the documentation before asking questions. Jason Bunting > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jose R > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 2:32 PM > To: M

[mochikit] Re: why the interpreter demo can't use help()

FYI, I get the same thing as well in FF and IE on WinXP.   From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wei Litao Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:33 AM To: Beau Hartshorne Cc: MochiKit Subject: [mochikit] Re: why the interpreter demo can't use help()

[mochikit] Re: escapeHTML not working as stated

Where is a good place to learn about closures?   From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Ippolito Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 1:35 PM To: Sean De La Torre Cc: MochiKit Subject: [mochikit] Re: escapeHTML not working as stated   Yeah, don't

[mochikit] Question on key()

seems like it should be easy.   Thanks, Jason Bunting     --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubsc

[mochikit] Readonly textbox not readonly in IE

nly. Anyone happen to know why? If I call toHTML(textbox) immediately afterwards, the results look like the following:   In IE:       In FF:       This is driving me crazy – I am hoping there is an easy remedy…     Jason Bunting   --~--~-~--~~~---~--

[mochikit] Re: Readonly textbox not readonly in IE

On Jul 5, 2006, Bob Ippolito wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Jason Bunting wrote: > > > var textbox = INPUT({"type":"text", > > "id":"MyTextboxId","autocomplete":"off", "readonly":"readon

[mochikit] Re: Readonly textbox not readonly in IE

On Jul 5, 2006, Bob Ippolito wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Jason Bunting wrote: > > > var textbox = INPUT({"type":"text", > > "id":"MyTextboxId","autocomplete":"off",  "readonly":

[mochikit] Re: Readonly textbox not readonly in IE

On Jul 5, 2006, Bob Ippolito wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Jason Bunting wrote: > > > On Jul 5, 2006, Bob Ippolito wrote: > > > > > On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Jason Bunting wrote: > > > > > > var textbox = INPUT({"type&qu

[mochikit] Problem with FF seeing all nodes in document...

ribute (as well as the other two I mentioned) shows the value I expect. Am I missing something obvious (or not so obvious)?   Thanks, Jason Bunting   --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mochi

[mochikit] Re: Problem with FF seeing all nodes in document...

> getNodeAttribute is for getting DOM attributes. tagName is not a DOM > attribute (in this example, "id", "cssStyle", "minValue, "maxValue" > are the only attributes), it's an attribute of the DOM node object > itself. Duh! Yeah, you'd think I would have realized that it is not an attribute -

[mochikit] Re: [ANN] Public Beta of MochiKit-enabled IDE

t public > release available to the MochiKit community. Hmm, looks good, though the last thing I want to have open on my system is yet another tool - you guys thinking of offering any integration with Visual Studio? :P I will play around with it though! Jason Bunting -- No virus found in

[mochikit] Re: developing with / for internet explorer

00% sure which line is failing in IE) sometimes it helps to stop execution, look down at the IE status bar and see if the error has shown up or not - if it has, the bad line of code was before the alert, otherwise it was after. This is tedious, but works well in those cases where you are banging

[mochikit] Naming conventions

…   Thanks, Jason Bunting   --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email

[mochikit] Re: Is anyone working on autocomplete for MochiKit?

> -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of ChrisH > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 7:12 PM > To: MochiKit > Subject: [mochikit] Re: Is anyone working on autocomplete for MochiKit? > > > > Is everyone else layering scriptaculous on top

[mochikit] Next stable release?

To quote, in part, from the MochiKit site, in response to the rhetorical question, “Which version should I get?” :   “We recommend that you use the development version (and join the MochiKit mailing list!) when developing your applications.   Once you're ready to deploy, it's usually ti

[mochikit] Re: beginners guide, for intepreter & ajax

> And I can only get clear() to work. I try a simple javascript command: > writeIn("hello") as in the video demo, and I get an error "writeIn is > not defined..." What am I doing wrong? It is *not* writeIn(), it is writeln(), and it works just fine. Jason -- No virus found in this outgoing m

[mochikit] Re: .Cookie or .Storage?

> -Original Message- > From: Beau Hartshorne > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 10:58 AM > To: MochiKit > Subject: [mochikit] .Cookie or .Storage? > > I'd like to add a nice Cookie interface to MochiKit. Working with > them manually sucks, but they're important for Ajax applications. > Shou

[mochikit] Re: src has no properties

preter gets to your line "connect('red', 'onclick', swapImg);" - however, 'window' does. Change your script section to look like this: var swapImg = function() { finalimg = IMG({'src': 'logo.png'}); swap

[mochikit] Finished port of ThickBox 2.1

://www.sapientdevelopment.com/downloads/Mochikit/MochiKitThickBox.zip Short, useless blog post about it here: http://jasonbunting.com/blahg/PermaLink,guid,297d24b0-f5e8-47d1-82e2-1804133fc6bf.aspx   If anyone improves it, I would love to have the changes.   Thanks, Jason Bunting

[mochikit] setStyle() not in documentation?

documentation, but I know nothing about submitting changes to an open source project such as this and don’t feel confident enough to submit anything regardless. J   Thanks! Jason Bunting   --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are

[mochikit] OT: Finite State Machine

has already done something similar or know of something that may help – I Google’d around a bit but didn’t find anything much.   Jason Bunting   --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit&q

[mochikit] Re: OT: Finite State Machine

On 10/31/06, Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Finite state machines don't really have much to do with the language > you're implementing them in. It's just a concept. I understand that... > You might find some inspiration from Python FSM implementations, > but it's pretty trivial to

[mochikit] Re: OT: Finite State Machine

On 10/31/06, Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/31/06, Jason Bunting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/31/06, Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Finite state machines don't really have much to do with t

[mochikit] Re: setStyle() not in documentation?

On 10/30/06, Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/30/06, Jason Bunting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > MochiKit advertises that one of the greatest things about it is the > > documentation and the accuracy thereof, as well as th

[mochikit] Re: Visual: When to use 'new' and when not to?

ing in the documentation that is PascalCased is a class, and thus needs to be instantiated, anything camelCased is a function and you can simply use it. This gets people all the time, myself included. I can't speculate as to the reasons for all of this and will defer that to someone that knows.

[mochikit] Re: Problem with IE

small-font','style':'margin-left:14em'}, > > TBODY(null, > > map(row_display, rows); > > > > swapDOM("action-place", newTable); > > Remember that IE *requires* THEAD and TFOOT. That is not correct; it sim

[mochikit] Re: MochiKitThickBox + IE (6.0 and 7.0)

> -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jorge Godoy > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:03 PM > Subject: [mochikit] MochiKitThickBox + IE (6.0 and 7.0) > > > Anybody here using MochiKitThickBox? I'm having problems with IE 6 an

[mochikit] Re: Problem with IE

> Jorge Godoy writes: > > "Jason Bunting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Jorge Godoy on Thursday, November 16, 2006 at 8:25 AM wrote: > >> > >> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >&g

[mochikit] Re: Problem with IE

> Jorge Godoy writes: > > "Jason Bunting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Jorge Godoy on Thursday, November 16, 2006 at 8:25 AM wrote: > >> > >> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >&g

[mochikit] connectOnce on wiki

On the wiki at http://trac.mochikit.com/wiki/connectOnce there is this implementation for a function that mimics 'connect' except it disconnects after the signal fires once (copied from wiki): function connectOnce(src, signal, dst, func) { var S = MochiKit.Signal var d

[mochikit] Color.fromBackground broken in IE 7?

Today I got latest from the subversion repository and am now getting an error (in IE 7) in some code related to MochiKit.Color.Color.fromBackground when I was not before (i.e. it used to work fine, now it doesn't). MochiKit.Color.Color.fromBackground calls MochiKit.Color.Color.fromComputedSty

[mochikit] Re: Color.fromBackground broken in IE 7?

That works, thanks! Jason >From: "Thomas Hervé" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "MochiKit" >Subject: [mochikit] Re: Color.fromBackground broken in IE 7? >Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:08:17 -0800 > > >I checked in a workaround in revision 1225. > >Can you verify it corrects your problem ? Thanks. > >-- >

[mochikit] Re: Some news from the VIsual front

ffect, for example. Does any of that make any sense? Thanks, Jason Bunting -Original Message- From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Hervé Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:58 AM To: MochiKit Subject: [mochikit] Re: Some news from the VIsual

[mochikit] Re: Some news from the VIsual front

Thomas Hervé wrote: Jason Bunting a écrit : > I had a comment/question: > > The puff, squish, grow and shrink effects all change the font size to make > it looks like the text is being affected in the same way as the container > thereof - sometimes the overall effect is not so

[mochikit] Re: Window.onClose with MochiKit.Signal?

In order to get the help you want, either post a full example of what you are doing or post a URL to one. Jason Bunting From: "jfagnani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MochiKit" Subject: [mochikit] Window.onClose with MochiKit.Signal? Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:03:22

[mochikit] parseQueryString bug?

agment identifier is included when present; is there another way to do this? Is my use of document.URL incorrect? Currently I am working around this with: parseQueryString(document.URL.split("#")[0]); Thanks, Jason Bunting __

[mochikit] Re: parseQueryString bug?

Hello? Can anyone help me out here? -Original Message- From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Bunting Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 3:18 PM To: mochikit@googlegroups.com Subject: [mochikit] parseQueryString bug? If the url of the page is

[mochikit] Re: onUpdate doesn't work for Sortable?

Wow - either no one really knows how to help me or this list is even deader than I thought. Guess I will have to become an expert on the internals of MK to get this figured out... :) > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jason

[mochikit] Re: onUpdate doesn't work for Sortable?

, June 25, 2007 8:31 AM > To: Jason Bunting > Cc: JasonBunting; MochiKit > Subject: [mochikit] Re: onUpdate doesn't work for Sortable? > > > Hi Jason, > > On 6/25/07, Jason Bunting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wow - either no one really knows how t

[mochikit] Re: Functions called by addLoadEvent can't access the DOM

Well, if your function is called myFunction and you are *really* calling addLoadEvent like this: addLoadEvent(myFunction()); then your problem is simple: you need to call addLoadEvent like this: addLoadEvent(myFunction); Notice the difference? Jason Bunting _ From: mochikit

[mochikit] Re: MochiKit Development

be continually developed? Some things just mature and are then good enough unless major bugs pop up. Jason Bunting > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of tobyclemson > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:56 AM > To: MochiKit

[mochikit] OT: Oliver Steele's Functional JS Library

Just wondering if there is any ideas here that may be useful for use within MK and whether anyone has already started using this library with MK. The full source is 33K but I was able to get it down to 9K with an obfuscation tool. Jason Bunting No virus found in this outgoing message.

[mochikit] Re: Form Validation

complete documentation and you will see what is provided; MochiKit has very little in its API that is as task-specific as "form validation helpers," instead providing generic helps. Jason Bunting No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Dat

[mochikit] Re: Sortable List - Dropped Element ID

y you can attach to an "ondrop" event, but I can't get that to work right. According to the sortables documentation page, "other options are passed to the Draggables and Droppables objects created. Refer to MochiKit.DragAndDrop for more information." Hope that helps, Jason

[mochikit] Re: Callbacks work when Firebug is turned on but not when off or not

Without your providing the code so that it can be duplicated, I am not sure how much help you are going to receive Jason Bunting >From: John Lorance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: MochiKit >Subject: [mochikit] Callbacks work when Firebug is turned on but not when >off or

[mochikit] Re: IE 7 Issues

or you. Of course, this solution is very specific to the client hitting your page. If you are creating a site for use by people that may not have that setting setup that way, you will want to stick with the timestamp hack. Jason Bunting > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

On 10/16/07, troels knak-nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/16/07, Daniel Fetchinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Five months ago someone posted a list of blocking bugs: > > > > > > On May 15, 9:57 pm, sayrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >

[mochikit] What is the purpose of __class__?

I see this convention being used but don't understand why it exists: __class__ Is it simply a Pythonic type of convention that isn't being used currently? What is the point of it and how can it be beneficially used? Thanks, Jas

[mochikit] Re: Walk child nodes of an element

To what end do you want to get at the text? If you simply want to grab it, use scrapeText()... Jason > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of JS > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 8:53 AM > To: MochiKit > Subject: [mochikit] Walk chi

[mochikit] Re: other widget toolboxes most compatbile with mochikit?

r MK to help me sell the idea of using MK to those around me. MochiKit port of ThickBox 2.1: http://www.sapientdevelopment.com/dotnetnuke/downloads/Mochikit/MochiKitThic kBox.zip Jason Bunting > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Be

[mochikit] Re: other widget toolboxes most compatbile with mochikit?

en using it for so long?! I went to a jQuery class put on by some coworkers and wasn't that impressed; either jQuery isn't that great or the class wasn't designed to highlight its strengths. Jason Bunting --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this mess

[mochikit] Re: other widget toolboxes most compatbile with mochikit?

a bunch of different widget library code, especially if from different sources, would potentially produce quite an ugly and inconsistent code base, which might not be such a good thing. :) Anyway, those are my rambling thoughts/opinions. Jason Bunting --~--~-~--~~~-

[mochikit] Docs Pages Broken?

Did something happen to the docs on the website? They don't have the expandable index on the main doc page any longer, nor on any of the namespace-specific pages. I love to have the former especially because I can easily search the entire API just by expanding all. Jason Bu

[mochikit] Re: Combine scripts to single file

. Jason Bunting > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Per Cederberg > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 7:33 AM > To: MochiKit > Subject: [mochikit] Re: Combine scripts to single file > > > packed/Mochi

[mochikit] Re: MochiQuery

would want to add more complexity to the code base for something that isn't really giving us anything more. Please tell me what I am missing, because I am sure there is something (it's late and my brain doesn't function that well at this time of the morning). Jason Bunting

[mochikit] Problems using partial toggleElementClass as an event handler...

s there anything that can be reasonably done to prevent this from happening or do I need to accept that I will have to write this code with the lambda? Thanks, Jason Bunting _ Making the world a better place one message at a

[mochikit] Re: Get text under the mouse pointer via javascript

scrapeText() to get the value out. connect(oneOfTheSpans, "onclick", function(eventArgs) { var textClickedOn = scrapeText(eventArgs.src()); }); I don't know, there is probably some much better way of doing this, but I thought I would at least respond. Jason Bunting

[mochikit] Re: Random Ideas for Mochikit.DOM

Why wouldn't you just use $$(".someClass") rather than getElementsByTagAndClassName(null, "someClass")? Just curious... Jason Bunting > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of machineghost > Se

[mochikit] Re: Random Ideas for Mochikit.DOM

rn of using MochiKit may not be the same as others, so I don't see a reason to change things. I rarely use the functions you mention, so their longs names are no problem for me. Just my opinion, for what little it is worth. Jason Bunting > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@

[mochikit] Re: Random Ideas for Mochikit.DOM

27;t see the library itself as missing anything. As your last goodwill effort, provide some useful feedback. Jason Bunting --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group,

[mochikit] Re: Random Ideas for Mochikit.DOM

ier alluded to in the comments about the XmlHttpRequest abstraction, I am certain the few of us that use MochiKit will make sure such features are implemented. > That framework isn't Mochikit. Well, "hasta la vista" then - hope you enjoy using jQuery; may it be everything you,

[mochikit] Re: Random Ideas for Mochikit.DOM

momentum going, I don't know. All I do know is that I love using this library and have a vested interest in keeping it around and building support around it (makes it an easier sell to clients that hear about nothing but jQuery, Dojo, YUI and prototype/scriptaculous). Hope everyone ha

[mochikit] Re: help with createDOM

browser is this failing in? If you want additional examples, even though your example seems to work just fine for me, there are a few on the documentation page: http://www.mochikit.com/doc/html/MochiKit/DOM.html Jason Bunting > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.co

[mochikit] Re: MochiKit Extensions

#x27;t the Async module sufficient? (What > is missing in your opinion?) I was wondering the same thing... Jason Bunting --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to

[mochikit] Re: MochiKit Extensions

> Amit Mendapara said: > > To obtain the source, you require Bazaar vcs > tools from (http://bazaar-vcs.org). > > bzr branch lp:mochikit-ext Actually, if you are like me and don't care to install yet another source control tool, you can simply download it from: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~me

[mochikit] Re: Formatting strings, numbers and stuff

> Per Cederberg said: > > > Has anybody created a generic formatting function in JavaScript? Other > libraries? Or am I the only one seeing the need? I agree that something like this should be a part of MochiKit; I remember looking for this functionality a couple of years ago and was surprise

[mochikit] Re: How can I refresh a particular div in a document

ce to you. Perhaps you can provide us more details? Jason Bunting --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe fr

[mochikit] Re: Selector speedup by using John Resig's Sizzle

> Arnar Birgisson wrote: > > To be clear, I'm basically asking the mailing list: Would you be OK > with it if the following selectors would stop working? > > a[fakeattribute] - i.e. checking for presence of attribute > p[lang|="en"] - membership test of hyphen-seperated string > collect

[mochikit] Why doesn't removeElement use the DOM Coercion rules?

); It seems to make little sense that one can append myWidgetInstance to the DOM using MochiKit.DOM functions, but can't remove it just as easily. Am I missing something here? Jason Bunting --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subs

[mochikit] Re: Why doesn't removeElement use the DOM Coercion rules?

iblingNodesAfter createDOM replaceChildNodes ... If those do, so should any of the others that expect DOM elements: removeElement swapDOM ... If this is merely work that needs to be done, I would be willing to do it. I simply want to see if and why others don't see the inco

[mochikit] Re: Why doesn't removeElement use the DOM Coercion rules?

That's it huh? No more discussion on this? I guess I am smoking crack... Jason > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jason Bunting > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:50 AM > To: 'Per Cederbe

[mochikit] Re: Why doesn't removeElement use the DOM Coercion rules?

> On Friday, October 10, 2008 at 11:33PM Bob Ippolito wrote: > > > If you'd like to fix it then I don't see why the patch would be rejected. > Sounds good, I will do just that. Thanks, Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are sub

[mochikit] Re: Why doesn't removeElement use the DOM Coercion rules?

> On Saturday, October 11, 2008 at 2:50AM Per Cederberg wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Jason Bunting > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Well... I think your case here is pretty uncommon. This is because the > >> __dom__() function is rea

[mochikit] Re: Including MochiKit.DragAndDrop and MochiKit.Sortable in the packed version?

Exactly what I was thinking - nice work! > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Arnar Birgisson > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 6:24 AM > To: Per Cederberg > Cc: MochiKit > Subject: [mochikit] Re: Including MochiKit.DragAndDrop and

[mochikit] Re: Why doesn't removeElement use the DOM Coercion rules?

> On Friday, October 10, 2008 at 11:33PM Bob Ippolito wrote: > > > If you'd like to fix it then I don't see why the patch would be rejected. > I assume that submitting patches through the mailing list is the way to go since I have seen so many already done this way, but if I need to submit it

[mochikit] Re: MochiKit.DOM.isChildNode and isParent

it is worth. Jason Bunting > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Per Cederberg > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 2:29 PM > To: MochiKit > Subject: [mochikit] Re: MochiKit.DOM.isChildNode and isParent > >

[mochikit] Re: MochiKit 1.4 released

Congrats and thanks to everyone involved for all of the hard work that goes into maintaining this stable toolkit! Jason Bunting > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Per Cederberg > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008

[mochikit] Re: Removal of Dojo and JSAN support

Good riddance... > -Original Message- > From: mochikit@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Per Cederberg > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:57 PM > To: MochiKit > Subject: [mochikit] Removal of Dojo and JSAN support > > > Just wondering -- is there anyone out the