Re: File uploading?

2000-03-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Frank Wiles wrote: Hello Everyone, I've been beating my head up against file uploading via the browser, in mod_perl. The example in the Eagle book doesn't seem to be working for me. This is the latest error I'm getting: [Wed Mar 29 20:36:07 2000] [error]

Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Steve Hay
Since I had no reply to my previous problem (re-directing STDOUT in system() calls), I thought I would try using Perl 5.6.0 instead of 5.005_03 (probably a good idea anyway) to see if that helped. Unfortunately, now I can't get (the Apache side of) mod_perl to compile. I'm using MSVC++ 6.0 on

[install warnings] apxs

2000-03-30 Thread Stas Bekman
Hi, While doing a simple: perl Makefile.PL DO_HTTPD=1 APACHE_SRC=../apache_1.3.12/src for each Makefile.PL in all subdirs I get: which: no apxs in (.:/usr/bin:/bin [snipped]) apxs:Error: Sorry, no DSO support for Apache available apxs:Error: under your platform. Make sure the Apache

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Steve Hay
"G.W. Haywood" wrote: Come to think of it, NT probably wasn't the best idea you ever had either. I agree, but we're selling a web application and most of our customers want it on NT. Unfortunately, now I can't get (the Apache side of) mod_perl to compile. You aren't alone. You really

[make test warns] mod_perl/mod_ssl

2000-03-30 Thread Stas Bekman
It seems that mod_ssl obsoletes gcache (see http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/CHANGES) Therefore 'make test' warns when starting the test server: will write error_log to: t/logs/error_log letting apache warm up...\c [Thu Mar 30 14:46:51 2000] [warn] mod_ssl:Compat: OBSOLETE

Re: loading of mod_perl

2000-03-30 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, shang wrote: Randy: Thanks for replying my message. First of all, my Perl os working and I can run some perl program in cgi-bin directory from browser. The c:\perl\bin is of course in the path. My Perl version is : v5.6.0 built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread.

Re: [install warnings] apxs

2000-03-30 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Stas, this is fixed in current modperl CVS, "Apache::src::apxs fixups to quiet warnings if apxs doesnt exist or httpd is not dso enabled, thanks to Oleg Bartunov and Ville Skyttä for spotting" Regards, Oleg On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Thu, 30 Mar

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Steve Hay wrote: seems a shame I can't get it to go with Perl 5.6.0. I just wondered if anyone out there new of any more hacks to help... Search the mod_perl List archive for 5.6.0? Most of it will be about it not working with something or other. After all,

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Steve Hay wrote: Since I had no reply to my previous problem (re-directing STDOUT in system() calls), I thought I would try using Perl 5.6.0 instead of 5.005_03 (probably a good idea anyway) to see if that helped. Unfortunately, now I can't get (the Apache side of)

Re: Apache::Session::DBI

2000-03-30 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm trying to use Apache::Session::DBI. I got the hang of it and started using it but I get the following error: [Thu Mar 30 04:41:41 2000] [error] Can't call method "store" on unblessed reference at lib/web/webmaster.p l line 54.

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Steve Hay
Thanks for this! I tried it with the latest mod_perl cvs: mine now compiles perfectly too (_never_ seen that before!!!), and there's now only 1 unresolved external symbol instead of 7. Looks like it could be nearly there - I'll try another one some time. I look forward to mod_perl 1.23 ...

Re: [OT slightly] mod_perl developers (do they exist?)

2000-03-30 Thread Bakki Kudva
Hi Stas, My suggestion would be to capture one of two of these tutorial sessions on audio tape(assuming employer consent), edit and sync them to a bunch of HTML slides and put the whole shebang on the Net...preferably right next to Stas' great guide. Some nifty examples of this are at...

Re: Compiling dynamic-loading perl on Solaris 7

2000-03-30 Thread Lloyd Zusman
I tried to find a general mailing list for perl, and I searched Deja and www.perl.com, and I found nothing, so I thought I'd try this mailing list. Hello. You may have already gotten other emails like this, but just in case you haven't ... You posted your question to the mailing list for a

Segmentation Fault: RedHat 6.[01] / Apache 1.3.12 / mod_perl 1.22 / perl 5.005_03 / IE 5

2000-03-30 Thread Robert Jenks
Title: Segmentation Fault: RedHat 6.[01] / Apache 1.3.12 / mod_perl 1.22 / perl 5.005_03 / IE 5 I'm having a very strange problem. I'm running a very large application under apache/mod_perl (100+ modules; httpd children grow to 40+MB). The application uses Apache::DBI (DBD::Oracle) CGI.pm,

RE: Segmentation Fault: RedHat 6.[01] / Apache 1.3.12 / mod_perl 1.22 / perl 5.005_03 / IE 5

2000-03-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
Title: Segmentation Fault: RedHat 6.[01] / Apache 1.3.12 / mod_perl 1.22 / perl 5.005_03 / IE 5 I'm not really the expert in this, but you might want to try removing PerlFreshRestart and Apache::StatINC from your config and see if that helps... HTH --Geoff -Original Message-From:

Embperl segfaulting under perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Michael J Schout
Hi. I seem to have run into some issues since I upgraded to perl 5.6.0. Since doing this, I recompiled all of my modules (I removed /usr/lib/perl5 and started fromscratch). I also recompiled apache/mod_perl so everything was linked against the properl libperl. Im using: apache 1.3.12 mod_perl

Re: Embperl segfaulting under perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Michael schout
Doh! I just checked the development version of HTML::Embperl, and this is fixed in there. Gerald: Could we patch this fix in to the HTML::Embperl stable tree and get a new stable release? I would like to avoid running the beta version of Embperl on a production site :). The patch in question

Can't locate object method OPEN via package Apache

2000-03-30 Thread Sam Carleton
I am trying to get the Apache::Magick module from the O'Reilly book "Writing Apache Modules with Perl and C" to work. The error I am running into is: Can't locate object method "OPEN" via package "Apache" (line 80) The looks real simply: open(STDOUT, "=" . fileno($fh)); Any thoughts on what

RE: Embperl segfaulting under perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Gerald Richter
Hi Mike, I just checked the development version of HTML::Embperl, and this is fixed in there. Gerald: Could we patch this fix in to the HTML::Embperl stable tree and get a new stable release? I would like to avoid running the beta version of Embperl on a production site :). The

Re: [OT slightly] mod_perl developers (do they exist?)

2000-03-30 Thread Stas Bekman
My suggestion would be to capture one of two of these tutorial sessions on audio tape(assuming employer consent), edit and sync them to a bunch of HTML slides and put the whole shebang on the Net...preferably right next to Stas' great guide. Some nifty examples of this are at...

Re: Can't locate object method OPEN via package Apache

2000-03-30 Thread Sam Carleton
darren chamberlain wrote: Try using CORE::open to be sure that the default open is being called. tried it, I am getting the same error, any more ideas? Sam

RE: Segmentation Fault: RedHat 6.[01] / Apache 1.3.12 / mod_perl 1.22 / perl 5.005_03 / IE 5

2000-03-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
Title: Segmentation Fault: RedHat 6.[01] / Apache 1.3.12 / mod_perl 1.22 / perl 5.005_03 / IE 5 PerlFreshRestart causes a great many problems, most for indeterminate reasons, but its behavior is at least documented see

[admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Stas Bekman
Folks, please refrain from posting in HTML. Some of us use email clients that post and read email in the old good text mode. When I don't have enough time on my hands I delete such emails since I cannot read them right away. Probably others too. Please don't tell me to get more

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: Please don't tell me to get more _sophisticated_ email client, my pine does everything for me. HTML should NOT be used for posting emails. Not only that, the list of mail sizes on mod_perl went: 1k 3k 2k 4k 20k - HTML Yikes. (although pine 4 and

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Sam Carleton
Stas Bekman wrote: Folks, please refrain from posting in HTML. Some of us use email clients that post and read email in the old good text mode. When I don't have enough time on my hands I delete such emails since I cannot read them right away. Probably others too. Please don't tell me to

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Chip Turner
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree 100%. HTML belongs in web browsers. If you happen to have a web browser in your mail reader, fine, but don't force others to have one as well :) Chip Folks, please refrain from posting in HTML. Some of us use email clients that post and read

Re: Problem Compiling with Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Steve Hay wrote: Thanks for this! I tried it with the latest mod_perl cvs: mine now compiles perfectly too (_never_ seen that before!!!), and there's now only 1 unresolved external symbol instead of 7. Looks like it could be nearly there - I'll try another one some

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread J. Horner
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Sam Carleton wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Folks, please refrain from posting in HTML. Some of us use email clients that post and read email in the old good text mode. When I don't have enough time on my hands I delete such emails since I cannot read them right

Re: Modperl 1.22 and Perl 5.6.0

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: configure Perl with -Dusemymalloc Wait, doesn't usemymalloc mean to use the system's native malloc? This from INSTALL: "To build without perl's malloc, you can use the Configure command sh Configure -Uusemymalloc" yeah,

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Angel R. Rivera
how about avoiding the me toos... At 02:04 PM 3/30/00 -0500, J. Horner wrote: On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Sam Carleton wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Folks, please refrain from posting in HTML. Some of us use email clients that post and read email in the old good text mode. When I don't

Re: [Patch] Apache::DB on Win32

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
thanks Gerald, applied for 0.07. On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: Hi Doug, the following patch allows Apache::DB to be used on Win32 Systems: In DB.xs wrap the SIGINT call at the last line inside a conditional, like: #ifndef WIN32 if (ApacheSIGINT)

Re: getting mod_perl working

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
try 1.22 instead of 1.21 On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Quadrilateral I was wrote: I've been trying to get ePerl installed on a redhat system, and I seem to have narrowed it down to a problem with mod_perl and/or apache. Whenever I add a PerlModule statement to httpd.conf and try to restart httpd,

Re: [make test warns] mod_perl/mod_ssl

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
httpd.conf should have: IfModule mod_ssl.c SSLDisable SSLSessionCache none /IfModule ok, applied, thanks!

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
"Angel" == Angel R Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angel how about avoiding the me toos... Yeah, and the people that post "upside down", with the answer *before* the question! Definitely. Let's avoid those. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095

Re: Can't locate object method OPEN via package Apache

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Sam Carleton wrote: I am trying to get the Apache::Magick module from the O'Reilly book "Writing Apache Modules with Perl and C" to work. The error I am running into is: Can't locate object method "OPEN" via package "Apache" (line 80) The looks real simply:

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Tom Christiansen
how about avoiding the me toos... [44 lines of crud we've already seen before] Hm... something wrong's with that message... % msgchk `mhpath cur` Quote follows response, Jeopardy style #2 Overquoted: 30 lines quoted out of 41: 73% Non-canonical signature separator:

[RFC - follow up] holding a mod_perl conference

2000-03-30 Thread Stas Bekman
Well, this is a follow up by the Camelot folks (Hi Stewart and Jeff) So please comment on this one too, thanks!!! Regarding the scriptwebdev conference, I mentioned this to Terry and Jeff again and they would like to see an outline/plan for how this event might work. For example, what would

Re: More segfault problems

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Shevek wrote: I can't find any documentation for what RULE_EXPAT does, the only occurrence at all is in Apache src/Configure, where it seels to compile in the expat lite library. RULE_EXPAT=no disables the expat lite library. there have been reports of it clashing with

Re: [RFC] holding a mod_perl conference

2000-03-30 Thread J. Horner
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: First of all, why holding yet another conference, the answer is simple, we want mod_perl to be in the center of the event and not a side project. Think about Perl Conference -- mod_perl is just a little part of the Apache track. Think about ApacheCon

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread David Block
ROTFLOL On 30 Mar 2000, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Angel" == Angel R Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angel how about avoiding the me toos... Yeah, and the people that post "upside down", with the answer *before* the question! Definitely. Let's avoid those. -- Randal L.

Re: [admin] [OT] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread kevin montuori
Tom Christiansen writes: how about avoiding the me toos... tc [44 lines of crud we've already seen before] [ 588 lines of pointless crud snipped. ] tc Hm... something wrong's with that message... hmm, what's wrong with yours? perl -077l12ne 'print "no mod_perl content"

Re: performance mongers: since when is using CGI.pm or Apache::Registrydishonorable?

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
geez. i don't recall "Apache::Registry vs. pure PerlHandler" or "Apache::Request vs. CGI.pm" ever being so harsh. but they have been compared, for good reason. Apache::Registry maps a request to a file and generates a subroutine to run the code contained in that file. if you use a

Re: [RFC] holding a mod_perl conference

2000-03-30 Thread Cliff Rayman
if you bring in all sorts of other technologies, how is this different than being part of apacheCon or Perl Conference? at least when I go to those (if i have time), almost everything else at the conference has some interest for me. i have only a modicum of interest in python, cold fusion and

[OT] I apologize

2000-03-30 Thread J. Horner
I apologize for the "me too" message. I didn't expect a Spanish Inquisition. . . . J. J. Horner Linux, Apache, Perl, Unix, Stronghold [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.knoxlug.org System has been up: 8 days.

Re: [admin] NO HTML posts please!

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
esrever ni snoitseuq gnirewsna diova esaelp dna On 30 Mar 2000, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Angel" == Angel R Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angel how about avoiding the me toos... Yeah, and the people that post "upside down", with the answer *before* the question!

Re: Apache::GzipChain and Netscape 4.7 doesnt work with huge files??

2000-03-30 Thread Honza Pazdziora
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:05:47PM +0200, Janning Vygen wrote: of the page. calling "view page source" only shows half of the content. It does work with some other and smaller files. With huge files (about 50k and lots of table rows and data) its broken. does anybody else notice this

Re: [OT] I apologize

2000-03-30 Thread Andrew Sweger
On Mar 30, 2000 @ 2:49pm, J. Horner wrote: I didn't expect a Spanish Inquisition. . . . (Okay, no one else said it, so...) NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! -- Andrew Sweger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | N2H2, Incorporated Systems Architect | 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 3400

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-30 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: Hi all... I finished an alpha of DebugHeaders (now potentially called DebugInfo) - here's the description. I still think it would fit much better as patches to Apache::DumpHeaders. :) They are doing pretty much the same thing. - ask -- ask

RE: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
Hey, I'm not trying to redo anyone's work or step on toes... I looked at DumpHeaders and thought that my stuff didn't quite fit in becuase: 1) it's longer - DumpHeaders is short and sweet 2) it's my attempt at trying to make something OO and extensible 3) it has functionality that

Re: Installation

2000-03-30 Thread Jeff Beard
./httpd -l will list all the mods built in. --Jeff At 08:00 PM 3/30/00, Annette wrote: Thanks for such a quick response. I have been in the mod_perl guide before asking the question. I learned from other mailing lists to always look in as many documents to solve your problem before posting a

adding Server-Side Includes to default files

2000-03-30 Thread Sam Carleton
I would like to have server-side includes to be parsed on DirectoryIndex files. I have followed the example in "Writing Apache Modules in Perl and C" and have my Apache::ESSI and this is what is in my perl.conf: Files ~ "\.ehtml$" SetHandler perl-script PerlHandler Appache::ESSI

Re: [RFC] holding a mod_perl conference

2000-03-30 Thread Ken Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Cliff Rayman wrote: if you bring in all sorts of other technologies, how is this different than being part of apacheCon or Perl Conference? at least when I go to those (if i have time), almost everything else at the conference has some interest

Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

2000-03-30 Thread Jeff Stuart
Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet? If so, how did it go? Oh, are we still at 1.21 for mod_perl? If so, when's the next release? I hear that there are some important memory leak fixes in there. -- Jeff Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

2000-03-30 Thread Rodney Broom \(OE\)
- Original Message - From: "Jeff Stuart" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet? Yes, all day. If so, how did it go? U guess. Lots of weird little errors that I can't quite resolve. I can get Apache installed, but if I build with mod_perl, I can't

Re: [PATCH 5.6.0] local $SIG{FOO} restoration

2000-03-30 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Hugo wrote: I believe that this (or take2) might cause a problem for code like: sub handler { print "sig handled" } my $handlesub = "handler"; [... something reads $handlesub in numeric context ...] $SIG{ALRM} = $handlesub; i suppose the handler should

Re: [PATCH 5.6.0] local $SIG{FOO} restoration

2000-03-30 Thread Tom Christiansen
i suppose the handler should not be restored if it was Perl's, something along the lines of (on top of take2 patch): Exactly! this kind of thing is common in programs that do sigmasks or tty mode masks. The typical mistake is set noecho do something unset noecho or block