Ime Smits wrote:
>
> Bottomline: Apache::ASP made me really happy because now don't have to
> develop for IIS anymore and I can stick to my Linux environment. I can
I'm also being told every once in a while by management
about why we aren't using IIS, you know, when they receive
marketing inform
Jerrad Pierce wrote:
>
> Are php3 and ASP mutually exclusive?
> I enabled mod_perl and mod_php3 (the defaults that come in the RH6.1
> distrib)
> and installed Apache::ASP, and while either or work, if I enable both the
> server spontaneously combusts. (It will touch the log files if they do not
FEITO Nazareno wrote:
>
> Hi buddy... I have a recommendation for you...
> Here where I work, we have a unix and a linux running Oracle databases
> accessed by perl and ASP, perl is embeded, I mean, .phtml, and it really
> sucks, I mean, is really crazy to do that, but the ppl didn´t know that...
On Apr 27, Jim Winstead wrote:
> Is it just me, or does libapreq not handle the response from multiple> correctly? It appears to only make one of the values
> accessible.
>
> From what I can tell, this appears to go all the way down to the
> Apache::Table implementation, where the underlying Apa
Is it just me, or does libapreq not handle the response from correctly? It appears to only make one of the values
accessible.
>From what I can tell, this appears to go all the way down to the
Apache::Table implementation, where the underlying Apache data
structure does not quite have the perl se
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, John M Vinopal wrote:
> I am a bad hacker and watching your line. I see cookies A and B go to you.
> I set cookies A and B in my web browser. I am now you. You can try to
> permute the cookies with IP# (breaks on proxies) or Browser type, but all
> cookie based approaches
Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> can you see if this patch fixes the problem? make sure you let mod_perl
> build httpd and pass USE_APACI=1 to Makefile.PL
>
> --- Makefile.PL 2000/04/21 06:24:27 1.158
> +++ Makefile.PL 2000/04/27 22:45:30 1.160
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
> $PER
Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > perl Makefile.PL USE_APXS=1 WITH_APXS=/usr/local/sbin/apxs EVERYTHING=1
>
> probably a long shot, but any difference if you build with USE_DSO=1
> instead of USE_APXS ?
My apologies for taking so long to reply -- it's been a busy week.
>From a cle
| Are php3 and ASP mutually exclusive?
Nope... I have Apache/1.3.12 (Linux 2.2.12), PHP/3.0.15, mod_perl/1.21_03
and Apache::ASP running perfectly well together. On another system
PHP/4.0RC1 is working in the same environment just as fine. However, as I
don't like the RedHat provided RPMs I built
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 4:27 PM -0500 4/27/00, Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
>Please disregard my previous email, I have figured out what store
>and locker to use.
What did you use?
>I thought that it was due to EMBPERL_COOKIE_PATH not being set, but
>setting it did not hel
can you see if this patch fixes the problem? make sure you let mod_perl
build httpd and pass USE_APACI=1 to Makefile.PL
--- Makefile.PL 2000/04/21 06:24:27 1.158
+++ Makefile.PL 2000/04/27 22:45:30 1.160
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
$PERL_DEBUG = "";
$PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL = "";
$PERL_STATIC_EXT
I am a bad hacker and watching your line. I see cookies A and B go to you.
I set cookies A and B in my web browser. I am now you. You can try to
permute the cookies with IP# (breaks on proxies) or Browser type, but all
cookie based approaches believe in the value of something sent cleartext.
O
We use a two stage system, Access and a combination
Authentication/Authorization stage.
When the user attempts to access a page a mod_perl Access handler checks
for a cookie (we think it's pretty secure :) showing they have been
previously authenticated. If not, they are sent off to an Authenti
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Dan McCormick wrote:
> If you split things between a proxy and a mod_perl server, the first hit
> would have to go through to the mod_perl server to initiate the session,
> but subsequent requests which may not need the session info could be
> sent to the proxy. Is that possi
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, bahwi wrote:
> I have a question about OOP, Inheritance, and mod_perl. I have OO
> pre-loaded module A, which clients B, C, and D use. Each one get's
> their own, and the configuration variables are different. My question here
> is how much memory does this take up? Is the mod
Different paradigm. There aren't going to be any unix users corresponding to the
users on the site (read: like an amazon.com user, not a unix user). This is going to
be used on a website for personalization stuff, and I think the potential of having
100+ unix users is a bad thing for perf
I have a question. I'm working on a project that requires not only file-by-file
authentication and authorization, but task-by-task authorization within a file (for
instance...read access, but not write). Basically, I'd like to have a database table
define permissions (which can be associated
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "SC" == Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> SC> developers and designers) for Webmonkey:
>
> SC> http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/00/18/index3a.html
>
> SC> If you want to see what sort of stuff the XSS problem opens you up for,
>
hi all...
well, this isn't a new module quite yet... I've been toying with
the idea of a module that does automatic server monitoring. I know there
must be programs out there that do this, and the guide has some examples,
but I was interested in creating a module add-in that would take
Are php3 and ASP mutually exclusive?
I enabled mod_perl and mod_php3 (the defaults that come in the RH6.1
distrib)
and installed Apache::ASP, and while either or work, if I enable both the
server spontaneously combusts. (It will touch the log files if they do not
exist, and then disappear).
Befor
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "SC" == Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> SC> developers and designers) for Webmonkey:
>
> SC> http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/00/18/index3a.html
>
> SC> If you want to see what sort of stuff the XSS problem opens you up for,
>
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
> Why on earth would you take user input and output it verbatim to your
> pages? Rule number 1 of developing a web site is to never trust the
> user's input values. *Always* validate it against what you're
> expecting.
I guess someone had better tell the
> "SC" == Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SC> developers and designers) for Webmonkey:
SC> http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/00/18/index3a.html
SC> If you want to see what sort of stuff the XSS problem opens you up for,
SC> just try appending ?tw=alert("aha!"); to the URL abo
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Marc Slemko wrote:
> > Can you be more specific about why you say that? If I set an encrypted,
> > short-lived cookie upon validated authentication, why is that any less
> > secure than any of the other approaches you mentioned?
>
> It isn't necessarily any "less secure", but
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Nick Tonkin wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Marc Slemko wrote:
>
> > Cookies are not secure and will never be secure. They may be "good
> > enough", and you may not have much choice, but they are still simply not
> > secure when you put everything together.
>
> Can you be mo
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Marc Slemko wrote:
> Cookies are not secure and will never be secure. They may be "good
> enough", and you may not have much choice, but they are still simply not
> secure when you put everything together.
Can you be more specific about why you say that? If I set an encrypt
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 02:29:15AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Matt & List,
> > Is there any benefit of mod_proxy over a real proxy front end like "Oops"?
> >
>
> This is a good question..., the only answer I've come up with thus far
> from reading the new-httpd devel list is compelling
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Jeremy Howard wrote:
> I'm interested in providing 'HTML email' support for my users (like
> HotMail, Outlook Express, Eudora 4.0, etc provide), but I'm very
> nervous about security. Essentially, providing HTML email involves
> letting any arbitrary HTML get displayed by Apa
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Is there any benefit of mod_proxy over a real proxy front end like "Oops"?
There's a big study of proxy servers posted at
http://bakeoff.ircache.net/N02/. There are some expensive ones with
dedicated hardware that perform well. Of course, there are tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I first tried to compile mod_perl-1.22 using APXS, but whenever I would
load the module, the Apache child would die.
Here's the command line I used:
perl Makefile.PL NO_HTTPD=1 EVERYTHING=1
WITH_APXS=/opt/apache-1.3.12/bin/apxs USE_APXS=1
I then tr
I was looking at Apache::Request file uploads again. IIRC, I decided to
prohibit file uploads early on in RequestNotes because at that time
RequestNotes was parsing the request and storing it in a hash and putting
that in pnotes and some suggested that blindly storing files in memory was a
bad id
According to Matt Sergeant:
> OK, just to get this onto a different subject line... I can't seem to get
> mod_proxy to work on the front end with name based virtual hosts on the
> backend, I can only get it to work if I have name based virtual hosts on
> both ends.
You should be able to use IP ba
> "MS" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MS> Still doesn't solve the problem of editing only 1 config file, unless I
MS> generate a config file with perl :(
I don't think it is possible to do it such that you only have one
config file to edit. Both sides need to know about the
I'm interested in providing 'HTML email' support for my users (like HotMail, Outlook
Express, Eudora 4.0, etc provide), but I'm very nervous about security. Essentially,
providing HTML email involves letting any arbitrary HTML get displayed by Apache...
Has anyone done this, or can anyone provi
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "MS" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MS> OK, just to get this onto a different subject line... I can't seem to get
> MS> mod_proxy to work on the front end with name based virtual hosts on the
> MS> backend, I can only get it to wo
| Oh, almost forget it... ASP is a loose of time on developer time... and
the
| module is to heavy, sorry but betwen oracle and ASP our server is down in
| performance, we run unix on a SGI and with 256mb ram...
| If you are trying to put ASP cause you don´t want to break the designer
| work, you
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Drew Taylor wrote:
> I'm not very skilled in this area, but it looks like you are proxying to
> a backend on port 8080, but you never specify port 8080 in the config
> for the backend... Perhaps this is it? Or did you leave out part of the
> backend config?
No - I just left
> "MS" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MS> OK, just to get this onto a different subject line... I can't seem to get
MS> mod_proxy to work on the front end with name based virtual hosts on the
MS> backend, I can only get it to work if I have name based virtual hosts on
MS> both e
> "MS" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MS> OK, I can't figure this out.. help me out here. I want to deal with my
MS> virtual hosts on the heavyweight server. The frontend server should just
MS> be a simple thing that I never have to touch.
Front end must be virtual-host aware a
I'm not very skilled in this area, but it looks like you are proxying to
a backend on port 8080, but you never specify port 8080 in the config
for the backend... Perhaps this is it? Or did you leave out part of the
backend config?
Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> OK, just to get this onto a different su
OK, just to get this onto a different subject line... I can't seem to get
mod_proxy to work on the front end with name based virtual hosts on the
backend, I can only get it to work if I have name based virtual hosts on
both ends. So I have a front end saying:
NameVirtualHost 194.70.26.133
Serve
"Bruce W. Hoylman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "Michael" == Michael Schout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Michael> Okay. I guess I am at a loss as to what this module should
>Michael> be named then. It is heaily based on the TicketAccess
>Michael> system in the modperl book.
You need to take a sledge hammer to your config... get rid of almost
EVERYTHING. Here is a copy of mine..., oh, and you might want to look
back a few days, I posted a really good link about mod_proxy and
mod_rewrite. Or search apache's site for mod_proxy, or just proxy...
that's how I came up wi
> "Michael" == Michael Schout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Okay. I guess I am at a loss as to what this module should
Michael> be named then. It is heaily based on the TicketAccess
Michael> system in the modperl book. It is a ticket based
Michael> authentication sy
Install mod_proxy. It will help... you see..., with a pipe that small
your httpd children are just sort of hanging around feeding really
really small packets. With mod_proxy you have two sets of processes.
For your bandwidth, you only need ONE big old fat mod_perl process.
And ten really really
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > 1 mod_perl process could handle all the load
> > you could possibly generate, and just let the mod_proxies build up and
> > you'll see a lot lower memory usage on your box... seriously, in low
> > bandwidth situations if your using the box for more th
On Apr 27, David Hajoglou wrote:
> I need to use the post, because that is what php3 is expecting. If
> anybody can think of any better way I would like to hear it. If not, then
> is it possible to translate a GET uri into a POST uri with a
> PerlTransHandler (or any other handler for that matte
Ok, looking at all the posts I need to spell all of it out. I am using
the database through the backend to prevend any passwords from being
transmited and possibally cached in a browser. Here is how it works:
Our user, lets call him John, loggs into our portal. This is a microsoft
environment
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You could however have someone with much more bandwidth than you use
> mod_proxy to proxy and cache your site. Like someone such as myself
> where bandwidth in the US is so cheap it's ridiculous. Upgrading to
> T1 size pipe in a couple weeks at $20
Talking about speed... I have a SGI with a line of 64k running two Apache,
one with mod_perl, mod_ssl and mod_asp with databases Oracle and seems like
httpd overload, he eat a lot of memory and the site is getting slow, i
suposse the problem is on the databases
(we all know about Oracle Databases,
You could however have someone with much more bandwidth than you use
mod_proxy to proxy and cache your site. Like someone such as myself
where bandwidth in the US is so cheap it's ridiculous. Upgrading to
T1 size pipe in a couple weeks at $200/mo with DSL... hehe, too
awesome. (384k now) So, l
> "d" == dreamwvr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
d> that is the whole point about squid since not all requests need to go all
d> the way out there and all the way back:-))
The discussion here is using squid as a reverse proxy, to accelerate
your httpd to the outside world. Not using squid
Matt Sergeant wrote:
> If I can't serve pages any faster, or to more people because
> of bandwidth limitations - what good can it do me?
dreamwvr may to trying to get the point across that squid could
be on the ISP side of your 64K line. I don't think this is going
to happen in practice, though
hi,
that is the whole point about squid since not all requests need to go all
the way out there and all the way back:-))
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, dreamwvr wrote:
>
> > hi,
> > so your saying that say 'squid' would not be productive? seems
> >
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, dreamwvr wrote:
> hi,
> so your saying that say 'squid' would not be productive? seems
> to me that if you are caching http and ftp stuff well that is going to
> provide you with the pseudo of more bandwidth.. since not all requests
> need to go beyond squid .. b
hi,
so your saying that say 'squid' would not be productive? seems
to me that if you are caching http and ftp stuff well that is going to
provide you with the pseudo of more bandwidth.. since not all requests
need to go beyond squid .. being delivered from the cache or chain of
cache
I'm behind a 64k leased line here (net access is *extremely* expensive
here in the UK) and I was thinking, a proxy front end is probably really
not necessary for me. Worst case scenario: I get 8 clients connecting to
my at about 1KB/s - my pipe is maxed out anyway, so pushing them
onto a proxy is
On: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 09:06:24 EDT "Ken Y. Clark" wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, David Hajoglou wrote:
>
>> so, is it possible to take a GET request and rewrite the uri into a POST
>> request and if so how?
>
>i'm not sure if that's really necessary. you could just put the GET args
>into $r->pnotes
All this talk of mod_proxy has me wondering: What's the conventional
wisdom regarding the speed up or load balancing of a server running
something like Apache::ASP, or anything else that tracks sessions?
If you split things between a proxy and a mod_perl server, the first hit
would have to go th
Hello all,
I have a perl question which is somewhat related because I'm trying to
write a mod_perl script but I'm stuck with this.
I need to search a flat file for either a specific user name, or for all
users. what I want to do is something like this...
...
if ($user_name =~ /all/)
{
$regex
> "MS" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> doing - and the TCP listen queue will hold a few more
>> connections if you are slightly short of backends.
MS> Is there any benefit of mod_proxy over a real proxy front end like "Oops"?
Not being familiar with "Oops", I can say that I
According to Matt Sergeant:
> Is there any benefit of mod_proxy over a real proxy front end like "Oops"?
I've run squid as an alternative and did not see any serious
differences except that the caching was defeated about 10% of the
time even on images, apparently because the clients were hitting
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Ken Y. Clark wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, David Hajoglou wrote:
>
> > so, is it possible to take a GET request and rewrite the uri into a POST
> > request and if so how?
>
> i'm not sure if that's really necessary. you could just put the GET args
> into $r->pnotes, perhap
> "s" == shane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
s> Okay, these are my thoughts, what do you think?
I just set upper bounds on the number of mod_perl processes to be
about 3/4 of RAM based on the size of the typical httpd with
everything loaded, and then I set the maximum number of front-ends to
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Y. Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 9:06 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: how to rewrite to a POST
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, David Hajoglou wrote:
>
> > so, is it possible to take a GET request and rewrite the
The first release of the packaged up Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is now
available for download, at http://xml.sergeant.org/download/
The kit bundles together the following modules:
Apache::MimeXML
Apache::XMLStylesheet
Apache::NotXSLT
Apache::XPathScript
Theres not very much documentation avail
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
>
> > Does this mean that we {will|may} be able to use the interpreter pool to
> > set up X Perl interpreters (say 20 to service dynamic handlers) with Z
> > apache (say 60 to handle static + dynamic content -
Sorry I´m just trying to make your life more easy...
Oh, almost forget it... ASP is a loose of time on developer time... and the
module is to heavy, sorry but betwen oracle and ASP our server is down in
performance, we run unix on a SGI and with 256mb ram...
If you are trying to put ASP cause you
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, David Hajoglou wrote:
> so, is it possible to take a GET request and rewrite the uri into a POST
> request and if so how?
i'm not sure if that's really necessary. you could just put the GET args
into $r->pnotes, perhaps like so:
sub handler {
my $r = shift;
return
Good For you buddie:)
We know that you can do that... ;)
bybye
Nazareno
Perl Programmer www.obsequie.com
Steve Hay wrote:
> I'm having a problem compiling mod_perl 1.23 (with Apache 1.3.12 / Perl
> 5.6.0) as a DSO using APXS on Solaris 2.4.
In case anyone is interested...
I've solved my own problem (just as well, really). If I re-compile
everything with the -Xa compiler flag then it all works out
Hi buddy, I have a recommendation for you. Keep recommendations like
this off the modperl list. Some people use Apache::Asp and they're
happy with it, others you Embperl, others use Mason. Some crazy
people like me occasionaly write web apps in c. If you have a
recommendation... I recommend yo
In last message I say this: in that way we connect with oracle with DBI
trought modperl
but what I did really want to say was... we connect with oracle trought DBI
and we use modperl for connect with the webserver.
Sorry, i hope is all clear...
bybye
Nazareno
Perl Programmer www.obsequie.com
Hi buddy... I have a recommendation for you...
Here where I work, we have a unix and a linux running Oracle databases
accessed by perl and ASP, perl is embeded, I mean, .phtml, and it really
sucks, I mean, is really crazy to do that, but the ppl didn´t know that...
in that way we connect with orac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have a question about OOP, Inheritance, and mod_perl. I have OO
pre-loaded module A, which clients B, C, and D use. Each one get's
their own, and the configuration variables are different. My question here
is how much memory does this take up
Aha, this is a new bug with the new version of Apache::Filter. As of 1.008,
the headers aren't sent until the first body text is output. That means that
during a HEAD request, they're never sent.
I've got a fix in mind - in the meantime you can downgrade to 1.007.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trevor Ph
Hello all!
Today I tried to install mod_auth_digest (Apache 1.3.12).
Installed without any problems, but when I request scripts with parameters
in protected directory -
Bad Request
requested URI /manager/script.asp not equals /manager/script.asp?param_1=23
---
> Right, but the difference with Oops is it's a threaded server, and while I
> couldn't get it to work (the author appears to be Russian, and his idea of
> documentation is "oops.cfg is easy to understand. Just edit it"), it looks
> like it should be extremely quick, even if serving static images
> where would an intrepid innocent turn for details on what methods
> and/or fields are available to the PerlLogHandler in the passed
> arglist @_ array (okay, $_[0] or shift) ?
>
> apparently
> ->last and
> ->request_time and
> ->status
> ..and $_[0]->last has submethods including
> get_r
from his webtechniques article a while back--(source code
is available at www.webtechniques.com)... here's a slice from
r.schwartz's quickie DBIlogger--
$r->push_handlers (
PerlLogHandler =>
sub {
my $orig = shift;
my $r = $orig->last;
my @data =
(
ht_time($o
Is anyone else having problems with Perl 5.6?
I just setup a new development box with fresh
installs of:
Perl 5.6
Apache 1.3.12 (compiled w/mod_perl 1.23 + PHP4 RC1)
Everything compiles and runs fine expect any
scripts that use either DBI or Apache::DBI.
My scripts work fine on a Perl 5.004 + mo
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Matt & List,
> > Is there any benefit of mod_proxy over a real proxy front end like "Oops"?
> >
>
> This is a good question..., the only answer I've come up with thus far
> from reading the new-httpd devel list is compelling though. Here's
> what
Matt & List,
> Is there any benefit of mod_proxy over a real proxy front end like "Oops"?
>
This is a good question..., the only answer I've come up with thus far
from reading the new-httpd devel list is compelling though. Here's
what people there said in response to folks trying to kill mod_p
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Leslie Mikesell wrote:
> According to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > So, overall..., I think that you should consider how many modperl
> > processes you want completely seperately from how many modproxy
> > processes you want.
>
> Apache takes care of these details for you. Al
I've discovered some problems that I think are related to Apache::Filter. It
certainly seems to affect only mod_perl scripts which use Apache::Filter...
Basically, when you do a HEAD request method, you don't get any headers back.
In fact, you don't get anything! When you do a normal GET method,
unsubscribe
Java is calling
86 matches
Mail list logo
