I am hoping someone might have a clue on how to resolve this awkward
problem.
I have just installed a mod_perl URI translation handler to extract a
session id from the URI. In general the translation works correctly by
removing the session id from the URL when detected. However, a Netscape
Can anyone recommend extra gcc options to squeeze the last ounce of
performance out of code (perl and apache in this case) on Intel?
I don't mind tying the code down to one cpu type or loosing the ability
to debug etc. We're already doing -O6 and are looking for more.
I recall Malcom Beattie
I actually was nearlly successful in accomplishing some sort of mechanism by
which developer packages can be mapped to a virtual package which the real
package points to (did this make sense?). Anyway, it needed to tap into the
symbol table way too extensively and ran into several problems.
I
make test has various errors (failed 18 total)
how do i debug these and fix them?
The test routines are just ordinary perl code that exercise various
portions of the module. It is like debugging any other perl code.
I don't suppose that was the answer you wanted, but that's the way it
works.
here's current setup:
slackware 7.0, with kernel 2.2.16
trying to compile test mod_perl 1.25 with fresh apache 1.3.17 source
have perl 5.6.0 installed
have libwww installed
make test has various errors (failed 18 total)
how do i debug these and fix them?
modules/cgi.ok 5/5FAILED test 4
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Jimi Thompson wrote:
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 11:48:07 -0600
From: Jimi Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IDE for Perl
Can anyone tell me if there's a good IDE for PERL? I have some big
projects coming and having the debug/testing etc. would be
We are using
RedHat Linux apache 1.3.14 mod_perl_1.23_01
Our site is set up to generate pages using a templating system to add
custom headers footers and sidebars. As well we use .htaccess files to
further customize the subprocess_env.
We are using custom modules installed as
Andrew Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know how to use "package" in the normal case, where it's static.
However, you can't say "package $foo" or even "eval 'package
foo'" or even "BEGIN { eval 'package foo' }." I'm wondering
if there's any way short of hacking the Perl source itself
to
Perl Builder 2.0 at http://www.solutionsoft.com/perl.htm
is a good tool, but i always end up going back to using vi, since escaping
gets in the way with other editors.
-Carlos
"Ken Y. Clark" wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Jimi Thompson wrote:
> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 11:48:07 -0600
> From: Jimi
Jesse,
It looks from your output like the server isn't even running for these
tests. Try to figure out whether that's true, and if so why it stopped
(or never started).
The debugging process here is admittedly a bit difficult.
There's an archive at http://mathforum.com/epigone/modperl/ .
I have to
install Apache-ASP, and there is a optional modul XSLT.I tried to install
this module but there is another prerequisite Modul XML::DOM needed. If I
want install this, the "make test" command failed, with the error message:
"Can't locate object method 'equals' via package
I'm looking forward to start using
Apache and mod_perl together...etc. The common E-commerce scenario. I will also
be planning to put in Embperl, and use MySQL. I have a RH 7.0 system with Apache
1.3.12 already installed and previously configured by me. Now I'm trying to
install mod_perl but
This is a repost because my earlier message from this morning bounced. Since
then I feel we have located the source of the problem. It looks like there
is a most bizarre interaction between Netscape clients and the proxy server.
Netscape was configured with manual proxy settings identifying the
If Ged did not answer your question well enough, check out
this answered as an FAQ item at:
http://www.apache-asp.org/faq.html#Apache%20errors%20on%20the%20PerlHandler%
20directive%20%3F
--Josh
Hi, Josh,
I now re-installed a fresh copy Apache_1.3.14 with mod_perl-1.24_01 with
USE_DSO=1
--
Try installing it DSO. The following link will provide some directions.
http://perl.apache.org/guide/install.html#Installing_separate_Apache_and_m
Webmaster wrote:
I'm looking forward to start using Apache and mod_perl together...etc. The common
E-commerce scenario. I will also be
hi folks! I am trying to get virtualhosts configured so it permited to
execute my scripts from them.
The problem is that when i call my scripts using the domain uri i get an
error on suexec_log.
Here is it:
[2001-02-01 17:44:45]: error: command not in docroot
Christian Heiss wrote:
I have to install Apache-ASP, and there is a optional modul XSLT.
I tried to install this module but there is another prerequisite
Modul XML::DOM needed. If I want install this, the "make test"
command failed, with the error message:
"Can't locate object method
Make sure you got the .htaccess file from the site/eg
example directory .. the problem here is that your ASP
config has not been activated. You could also try setting
the Location to /eg/
--Josh
I just noticed the "make test" part of installation has error * error
code 29
with Command
"Wang, Pin-Chieh" wrote:
Location /asp/
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler Apache:ASP
PerlSetVar Global /tmp
/Location
When I call http://host/eg/index.html to test asp I got
#!/usr/local/bin/perl5 asp
[0]%([0]%source)
Make sure
Hi,
I installed Apache_1.3.14 with mod_perl 1.24_01 with DSO
everything seems o.k.
then I installed Apache-ASP-2.07 found I missing Devel::Symdump
I then went back to install Devel::Symdump
But when I make test in Devel::Symdump I had failure in 1/13 test
with error code 29
command failed for
Special thanks to Christian Gilmore who did a partial rewrite to switch the
cache to IPC::Cache, clean up code, and remove the logging of passwords.
-FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 22:11:05 +0100
From: PAUSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jason Bodnar [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
You can also change the package using globs.
*{NewPackage::} = *{TestPackage::};
NewPackage will then contain all things in TestPackage
Then you can redefined everything in TestPackage without affecting
anything in NewPackage.
You can also do something like
for my $name (keys %{Test::})
Because suexec is build with a predefined path which allows only scripts
underneath that path to run in. You need to find out what the 'docroot' is
and be sure that your script is underneath this path. There are several
other restrictions that need to be done to ensure that cgi's being run
NewPackage will then contain all things in TestPackage
Then you can redefined everything in TestPackage without affecting
anything in NewPackage.
Actually it will, if you were to delete NewPackage, TestPackage would not
contain anything. Modifying 'thingys' in TestPackage would modify
Hi Tim,
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Tim Bunce wrote:
Can anyone recommend extra gcc options to squeeze the last ounce of
performance out of code (perl and apache in this case) on Intel?
I don't mind tying the code down to one cpu type or loosing the ability
to debug etc. We're already doing -O6
This isn't the best place to ask these questions.
Steve Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And you'd probably want -march=i686 (or whatever CPU you're using).
Not necessarily. gcc and ia32 is weird that way.
I would use whatever Linus co. decided to use for the kernel on that
arch in question.
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:51:56PM +, Tim Bunce wrote:
Can anyone recommend extra gcc options to squeeze the last ounce of
performance out of code (perl and apache in this case) on Intel?
I don't mind tying the code down to one cpu type or loosing the ability
to debug etc. We're already
Tim Bunce wrote:
Can anyone recommend extra gcc options to squeeze the last ounce of
performance out of code (perl and apache in this case) on Intel?
I don't mind tying the code down to one cpu type or loosing the ability
to debug etc. We're already doing -O6 and are looking for more.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Tim Bunce wrote:
Can anyone recommend extra gcc options to squeeze the last ounce of
performance out of code (perl and apache in this case) on Intel?
I don't mind tying the code down to one cpu type or loosing the ability
to debug etc. We're already doing -O6 and are
Jimi Thompson writes:
Can anyone tell me if there's a good IDE for PERL?
its not realy an ide (well almost) but
have you looked at xemacs/emacs ?
it does syntax hightighting
and all kinds of stuff i havent had a chance to look at yet
I have some big
projects coming and having the
I have been testing and troubleshooting this for days, and I can find no
other answer to my problem except that DBD::mysql has a memory leak.
I have narrowed it down to this small script running through
Apache::Registry:
use DBI;
use
Hi Mark.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Mark Blythe wrote:
I have been testing and troubleshooting this for days, and I can find no
other answer to my problem except that DBD::mysql has a memory leak.
I have narrowed it down to this small script running through
Apache::Registry:
Hi Doug,
Just installed Apache 1.3.7 and mod_perl 1.25 on my Linux box. To my
surprise, when I ran my scripts using PerlRun.pm, the "Prototype mismatch"
problem still occurs. When examining the code, it happened to be that line
344 of the new PerlRun.pm is:
*{$fullname} = eval "sub ($p)
Ok, through more trial and error, I've managed to whittle the offending
script down to this:
use strict;
print "Content-type: text/plain\n\nHello World!";
That's it, and it still leaks. So, apparently the problem is not with DBI
or DBD::mysql at all. The only components left seem to be
You know I am also seeing this exact result.
I compiled perl 5.6 and Apache 1.3.17 using gcc egcs-2.91.66
on a RH Linux 6.1 system.
If I compile Apache without modperl it run OK. If i compile it with
mod_perl 1.25 I also get the segmentation fault on startup.
I looked in ../mod_perl/SUPPORT
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:25:41PM -0800, Matisse Enzer wrote:
You know I am also seeing this exact result.
I compiled perl 5.6 and Apache 1.3.17 using gcc egcs-2.91.66
on a RH Linux 6.1 system.
If I compile Apache without modperl it run OK. If i compile it with
mod_perl 1.25 I also get
There have been a LOT of Off Topic (OT) posts this week on the mod_perl
list without the OT prefix. At least more than I've seen as usual.
Please take the time to add a [OT] prefix to the posts when it is not
directly mod_perl related.
If you are responding to a clearly OT post that didn't
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
sorry again for all the confusion with this morning's digest (I do code more
carefully than I write, really I do...)
this does present the opportune time to ask the list about the future of
this digest...
currently, the digest does not have a
38 matches
Mail list logo
