Re: Seeking Legal help

2001-11-22 Thread John Armstrong
From experience in the dotcom world I can tell you this, its a hard balance to fight. The more you push and threaten the lower on the pile of bills you will go. If this company is going to file for Chapter 11 they have no incentive to pay you at all. In fact, I remember watching management

usage of die() inside a mod_perl Apache handler shows not the expected behavior

2001-11-22 Thread Silvio Wanka
Hi, I use the following configuration: LocationMatch /(xx|yy) PerlHandlerApache::MyPkg SetHandler perl-script /LocationMatch and the handler is defined in this way: package Apache::MyPkg require 5.005; require Apache::Request; use constant TmpDir =

RE: Apache::Session Problem -- Addendum

2001-11-22 Thread Jonathan M. Hollin
Thank you everyone for the quality of help I've so far received and your rapid responses. However... :-( My code now includes: 35: # Session handler... 36: my %session; undef my $session_id; 37: use Apache::Session::MySQL; 38: tie %session, 'Apache::Session::MySQL', $session_id, 39: {

Persistent HTTP Connections ala Apache::DBI

2001-11-22 Thread Hans Juergen von Lengerke
I'm working on a web application which obtains data via a legacy system rather than DBI. Using DBI is (unfortunately) not an option. The machine where the web application runs cannot run the legacy system. Thus, the setup looks somewhat like this: DB = DB Query (Legacy) = Apache/mod_perl

Perl sections from within a module

2001-11-22 Thread Issac Goldstand
Is there a way of doing configuration work (the equivalent of Perl sections) from within modules? I ask both for subroutines which are called at server startup (from mod_perl_start.pl) and from other handlers... Thanks in advance, Issac Internet is a wonderful mechanism for making a fool

Re: Perl sections from within a module

2001-11-22 Thread Stas Bekman
Issac Goldstand wrote: Is there a way of doing configuration work (the equivalent of Perl sections) from within modules? I ask both for subroutines which are called at server startup (from mod_perl_start.pl) and from other handlers... Yup, just modify things in Apache::ReadConfig package.

Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

2001-11-22 Thread Randy Kobes
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote: Greetings. Randy That's great that you thought this out and put it together; Randy a few comments below appear below ... Thanks for playing editor - and I am accepting all of your suggestions, with the possible exception of what follows.

RE: Apache::Session Problem -- Addendum

2001-11-22 Thread Paul DuBois
At 10:43 AM + 11/22/01, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote: Thank you everyone for the quality of help I've so far received and your rapid responses. However... :-( At the rist of making a shameless plug, you can visit http://www.kitebird.com/mysql-perl/ and grab the webdb source distribution there.

Re: [OT] Re: Seeking Legal help

2001-11-22 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
* On 2001-11-22 at 10:37, Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say: On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: Maybe they weighlayed your invoice. Or don't have the money just yet but ^^^??? You folks may have invented the language but its still spelled

Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

2001-11-22 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote: Greetings. Randy That's great that you thought this out and put it together; Randy a few comments below appear below ... Thanks for playing editor - and I am accepting all of your suggestions, with the possible exception

Re: [OT] Re: Seeking Legal help

2001-11-22 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Um, no, it's spelt waylaid. :-) As you and everybody else has pointed out (mostly in private email). I was so eager and excited to give Matt some shit that I somehow incorporated part of his mistake. Oh well, that's what I get for teasing.

Re: [OT] Re: Seeking Legal help

2001-11-22 Thread Mark Maunder
Matt Sergeant wrote: Step three: Once you've given them 90 days after date of invoice, get a solicitor (not a barrister) to draft a threatening letter. It'll cost you about $100. I'm afraid you'll have to give them another 30 days at this point. Step four: Get a lawyer. Sue. $25,000 is not

Re: Documentation patch for mod_perl//win32

2001-11-22 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: Don't modify the guide, just throw some random and structured winXX notes into a new doc,and we just add it to the guide as a new chapter. Then people start sending patches and polish it, like the rest of the chapters. The new 2.0 docs generation will

Re: Persistent HTTP Connections ala Apache::DBI

2001-11-22 Thread Rob Nagler
Has anyone done such a thing before? No doubt. Can someone point me to docs or modules which could help doing this? Perhaps raw sockets might be a consideration. However, Apache is great middleware, so I tend to use it in cases like this. You might want to use a session-based approach

Re: [OT] Re: Seeking Legal help

2001-11-22 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 01:34 AM 11/23/2001, Mark Maunder wrote: Matt Sergeant wrote: Step three: Once you've given them 90 days after date of invoice, get a solicitor (not a barrister) to draft a threatening letter. It'll cost you about $100. I'm afraid you'll have to give them another 30 days at this

[OT] Re: Seeking Legal help

2001-11-22 Thread Bill Moseley
At 03:21 PM 11/21/01 -0800, Medi Montaseri wrote: I did some work (about $25000 worth) for a customer and I'm having problem collecting. This has been beaten to death on the list, but... (and I'm not a lawyer, but I drink beer with one), If you think they are going Chapter 11, then you may

VirtualHosts-Config inside of modules

2001-11-22 Thread Nico Erfurth
Hi, i made a small script to configure an Apache-Webserver via LDAP-entries. First i put everything in a Perl/Perl-Section, it worked. Now i want to put it inside a module, and everything works, EXCEPT, that i can't add VirtualHosts. in the Perl-Version i used use

Apache::AuthCookie login faliure reason

2001-11-22 Thread simran
Hi All, Iam having some trouble getting Apache::AuthCookie (version 3 which i believe is the latest version) to do what want: What i want is: * To be able to give the user a reson if login fails - eg reason: * "No such username" * "Your password was incorrect" Has anyone else

Re: Apache::AuthCookie login faliure reason

2001-11-22 Thread clayton
yes its pretty easy one to do, btw: i first found out how by investigating the Apache::AuthCookie code here is the meat of the matter send something like this to the $r-subprocess_env {the name im using is the same as authcookie's with the 2 added} $r-subprocess_env('AuthCookieReason2',

RE: Apache::AuthCookie login faliure reason

2001-11-22 Thread simran
Thanks for your response Clayton. Although unfortunately its not working for me as from what i understand: * When a person has to login (asusming they have no cookie set yet), if they enter the wrong credentials authen_cred does a _external redirect_ (aka redirects the browser to go to that

Re: Apache::AuthCookie login faliure reason

2001-11-22 Thread Carolyn Hicks
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 04:09:45PM +1100, simran wrote: What i want is: * To be able to give the user a reson if login fails - eg reason: * No such username * Your password was incorrect On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 09:26:17PM -0800, clayton wrote: here is the meat of