perl xml api's

2002-06-21 Thread mikedennisdanese
thanks matt, i'll get it(XML::LibXML) andgiveit a go. __ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own

Re: perl xml api's

2002-06-21 Thread Matt Sergeant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 22 June 2002 12:57 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, My Mission(must accept it) is to retrieve xml-formatted mail, parse > thru char-sets in msg-body, if chars out of ascii range: generate err msg. > > While I wade thru the apis could any

Re: Knowing your limitation - was Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Gunther Birznieks
I agree with Tom but for different reasons. I would almost never accept a telecommuter I didn't know and that may even be if he or she came recommended. Everyone has different personalities and cultures and it takes time to really get to know how to effectively communicate with someone because

Re: Fascinating segfault at Apache startup

2002-06-21 Thread E Kolve
I got this error and spent a bit of time trying to figure it out. The reason I was getting it was that I had started with a RedHat 7.2 system which comes with Perl 5.6.0 and upgraded to 5.6.1 using RH 7.3 RPMS. I then compiled mod_perl against 5.6.1. Each time I started up I got the absurdfo

[GUIDE] Installing Apache with mod_accel, mod_deflate

2002-06-21 Thread Philip Mak
For those of you who have mod_accel and mod_deflate and need to upgrade your Apache version due to the security exploit, I wrote a document that tells exactly what to do from start to finish. I wrote this because I was tired of having to dig up old mailing list posts to figure out how to install t

perl xml api's

2002-06-21 Thread mikedennisdanese
Hi, My Mission(must accept it) is to retrieve xml-formatted mail, parse thru char-sets in msg-body, if chars out of ascii range: generate err msg. While I wade thru the apis could any one suggest which modules would fit this task? Will XML::Parser retrieve a doc from a url or must the doc be re

[ANNOUNCE] mod_perl-1.99_04

2002-06-21 Thread Doug MacEachern
The URL http://perl.apache.org/dist/mod_perl-1.99_04.tar.gz has entered CPAN as file: $CPAN/authors/id/D/DO/DOUGM/mod_perl-1.99_04.tar.gz size: 396779 bytes md5: 6d573b4de6a90246154bfc436da4fced note: 1.99_04+ is required to compile with 5.8.0-RC2 note: 1.99_04+ will no longer compi

Knowing your limitation - was Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Tom Mornini
Thanks for your response, Zac. Our tech team is very small. I'm the manager of the group, and my management style would best be described as lackadaisical. :-) So, you're right, this requirement is based upon management weakness. I knew that when I posted the job offer. In fact, I even told that

Re: [OT] Re: Apache Web Server vulnerability

2002-06-21 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 20:06 21.06.2002, Philip Mak wrote: >On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 05:31:00AM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > > 64bit binaries are exploitable. There are also exploits for several > > 32bit systems. > >Does anyone know if Red Hat Linux 7.2 on i686 is vulnerable to the >remote shell (not the DoS) e

Re: [OT] Re: Apache Web Server vulnerability

2002-06-21 Thread Ilya Martynov
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:06:45 -0400, Philip Mak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: PM> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 05:31:00AM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: >> 64bit binaries are exploitable. There are also exploits for several >> 32bit systems. PM> Does anyone know if Red Hat Linux 7.2 on i686 is vul

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89)

2002-06-21 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 19:46 21.06.2002, Stas Bekman wrote: >Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: >>At 18:26 21.06.2002, Zac Morris wrote: >> >>>I actually have a question along these lines >>> >>>I'm new to mod_perl myself, and I've just installed a new setup with Apache2 >>>and the mod_perl2 beta. >>> >>>That's all workin

[OT] Re: Apache Web Server vulnerability

2002-06-21 Thread Philip Mak
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 05:31:00AM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > 64bit binaries are exploitable. There are also exploits for several > 32bit systems. Does anyone know if Red Hat Linux 7.2 on i686 is vulnerable to the remote shell (not the DoS) exploit?

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI0.89)

2002-06-21 Thread Stas Bekman
>> but first you need: >> >> PerlModule Apache2 >> >> or 'use Apache2' in startup.pl. see: >> >http://perl.apache.org/release/docs/2.0/user/config/config.html#Accessing_the_mod_perl_2_0_Modules > >> > > > Nope, he did a "clean" mod_perl 2 install, without MP_INST_APACHE2 I > think... so does

Re: Apache vulnerability: update of uwinnipeg win32 packages planned?

2002-06-21 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Alessandro Forghieri wrote: > Greetings. > > I was wondering wether Randy is planning an update for his (great) archives > on uwinnipeg. > > Cheers, > alf The mod_perl ppms (both for mod_perl-1 and mod_perl-2) have been updated to the new apache versions, as has the Apache2.

Apache Web Server vulnerability the full monte

2002-06-21 Thread dreamwvr
June 21, 2002 High Risk Apache Exploit Circulating By Ryan Naraine The Apache Foundation has issued a warning that exploits to its chunk handling vulnerability are circulating on the Internet, putting users of its open-source server at high risk. The vulnerability, which Apache now says aff

Re: Compiling mod_perl 1.27 on Win32

2002-06-21 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Vladimir Goncharov wrote: > Hello All, I am failed to compile mod_perl on Win32 using > "Apache mod_perl-1.xx installation instructions for Win32" > from http://perl.apache.org/win32_compile.html > > Used software : > Apache 1.3.26 + mod_ssl 2.8.9 > mod_perl 1.27 > ActiveP

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI0.89)

2002-06-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > At 18:26 21.06.2002, Zac Morris wrote: > >> I actually have a question along these lines >> >> I'm new to mod_perl myself, and I've just installed a new setup with >> Apache2 >> and the mod_perl2 beta. >> >> That's all working well and my old cgi-bin type stuff wo

Re: Apache Web Server vulnerability

2002-06-21 Thread dreamwvr
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 05:31:00AM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, dreamwvr wrote: > > > "my comments FWIW" > > This means thus far does not impact as_seriously little endian NIX > > based architectures. The reason being? That Apache spawns a pool of > > child processes to

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89)

2002-06-21 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 18:26 21.06.2002, Zac Morris wrote: >I actually have a question along these lines > >I'm new to mod_perl myself, and I've just installed a new setup with Apache2 >and the mod_perl2 beta. > >That's all working well and my old cgi-bin type stuff works under mod_perl >great. > >Now I'm trying

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89

2002-06-21 Thread Zac Morris
I actually have a question along these lines I'm new to mod_perl myself, and I've just installed a new setup with Apache2 and the mod_perl2 beta. That's all working well and my old cgi-bin type stuff works under mod_perl great. Now I'm trying to get more into the mod_perl specific stuff and

Fwd: Perl 5.8.0 Release Candidate 2

2002-06-21 Thread Stas Bekman
[a note from me: This is probably the last RC before 5.8.0-final is released. So test your code now or don't complain later that something breaks.] Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:59:55 +0300 From: Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Perl 5.8.0 Release Candidate 2 =h

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89

2002-06-21 Thread Perrin Harkins
Stas Bekman wrote: > the threaded mpms will need a new version/mode of Apache::DBI using > threads::shared, currently available only for 5.8.0-tobe, unless things > will get backported to 5.6.2. Currently it seems that the threaded mpms > will be safe to use only with 5.8.0, unless again things

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89

2002-06-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Perrin Harkins wrote: > Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > >> In the last almost 3 years only two bugs has been found. Edmund no >> longer has time to make releases and such, so I fixed the last bug >> and made a new release which is available on CPAN. > > > Thanks for taking over maintenance on this.

Re: Apache::LightBackhand

2002-06-21 Thread Perrin Harkins
Ricardo Basto wrote: > For example, the other modules try to interpret the response code of the > request before forwarding it back. My module tries the opposite: the > only case it will fake a response code different from what it got is > when the LWP request times out. Every 404, 500, 302 etc. w

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89

2002-06-21 Thread Perrin Harkins
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > In the last almost 3 years only two bugs has been found. Edmund no > longer has time to make releases and such, so I fixed the last bug > and made a new release which is available on CPAN. Thanks for taking over maintenance on this. Any thoughts about how to add supp

Re: apache 1.3.24 mod_perl 1.27 perl 5.6.1 segv

2002-06-21 Thread wsheldah
PLEASE upgrade to apache 1.3.26, especially if you're rebuilding now anyway. There are root exploits circulating for apache 1.3.24 and below. Wes Sheldahl John Saylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/21/2002 11:18:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Wesley Sheldahl/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: ap

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Zac Morris
Old fashioned is right, and disregarding "telecommuters" is also extreemly short sighted and ultimaty limits your ability to provide the most quality solution...   I work for Cisco Systems in our RTP (NC) office.  I work with two different groups, one based in San Jose and the other based in

apache 1.3.24 mod_perl 1.27 perl 5.6.1 segv

2002-06-21 Thread John Saylor
Hi Try as I might, I cannot get apache to run. It just keeps segv-ing. When I run it with -X I can see the failure [with gdb's help] #0 0x401aac25 in __libc_free (mem=0x4039c778) at malloc.c:3155 #1 0x403472c4 in Perl_sv_clear () from /opt/webtree/ww/modules/libperl.so #2 0x403474d5 in Perl_s

Compiling mod_perl 1.27 on Win32

2002-06-21 Thread Vladimir Goncharov
Hello All, I am failed to compile mod_perl on Win32 using "Apache mod_perl-1.xx installation instructions for Win32" from http://perl.apache.org/win32_compile.html Used software : Apache 1.3.26 + mod_ssl 2.8.9 mod_perl 1.27 ActivePerl -5.6.1.631-MSWin32-x86 MS VC++

Re: [apache-ssl] Porblems marrying Apache 1.3.26, pache-ssl 1.48 and mod_perl 1.27

2002-06-21 Thread The Doctor
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 12:18:37PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > The Doctor wrote: > > It has been a long time since what I have described happened. > ... > > /tmp: Permission denied > > > > assertion "0" failed: file "apache_ssl.c", line 1616 > > This is gcache failing to start (mental note: must

[ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89

2002-06-21 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
Since early 1997 Edmund Mergl has been developing and maintaining Apache::DBI. I would think that it's now one of the most used Apache related modules (and one of the most stable!) In the last almost 3 years only two bugs has been found. Edmund no longer has time to make releases and such, so

Re: Question about Work Wanted ads

2002-06-21 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, southernstar wrote: > I was aware that on occasion individuals are welcome to post work > wanted ads, but I have some specific questions about how I can > actually get some short contract work here and there, since: [...] Get involved with some of the open source projects; t

Re: [JOB WANTED] Seeking additional Perl/Mod_perl work...

2002-06-21 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: [...] > That's a sensitive issue. We were always welcoming posts from > individuals looking for jobs, and companies looking to hire (in the > mod_perl area of course). Though I tend to agree with Gunther that such > posts from for-profit companies looking f

Re: Apache Web Server vulnerability

2002-06-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Lupe Christoph wrote: > > [...] > > Sorry that is not the answer to my question - the question is if my > > code gets a chance to do *anything*, or will the httpd code just > > crash at a later time? It does not crash like a no

Re: Apache Web Server vulnerability

2002-06-21 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, dreamwvr wrote: > "my comments FWIW" > This means thus far does not impact as_seriously little endian NIX > based architectures. The reason being? That Apache spawns a pool of > child processes to serve requests. Therefore a DoS kills the child serving [...] This doesn't mak

Re: Apache Web Server vulnerability

2002-06-21 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Lupe Christoph wrote: [...] > Sorry that is not the answer to my question - the question is if my > code gets a chance to do *anything*, or will the httpd code just > crash at a later time? It does not crash like a non-mod_perl httpd. I believe it only crashes when using the

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Phil Dobbin
On 21/6/02 at 17:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stas Bekman) wrote: > > Phil Dobbin wrote: > > On 20/6/02 at 20:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Mornini) wrote: > > >>If you're a good Perl programmer who has a strong sense of "the way > it > >>should be" and can be simultaneously mean, nasty, angry, distrust

Apache vulnerability: update of uwinnipeg win32 packages planned?

2002-06-21 Thread Alessandro Forghieri
Greetings. I was wondering wether Randy is planning an update for his (great) archives on uwinnipeg. Cheers, alf

Re: Apache Web Server vulnerability

2002-06-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Richard [utf-8] Čepas wrote: > On Wed Jun 19 17:54:02 2002 +0400 Igor Sysoev wrote: > > >On 19 Jun 2002, Ilya Martynov wrote: > > > >> If you still do not know about it: > >> > >> http://httpd.apache.org/info/security_bulletin_20020617.txt > >> > >> Now mod_perl questi

Re: Apache Web Server vulnerability

2002-06-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Thursday, 2002-06-20 at 18:22:10 +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Lupe Christoph wrote: > > > > > and the mod_perl module seems to prevent the crash: > > > > > > > telnet proxy.customer.de 80 > > > > Trying 213.155.64.138... > >

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Phil Dobbin wrote: > On 20/6/02 at 20:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Mornini) wrote: >>If you're a good Perl programmer who has a strong sense of "the way it >>should be" and can be simultaneously mean, nasty, angry, distrustful >>and [...] > Sorry if I haven't kept up with this thread but, is thi

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
Phil Dobbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry if I haven't kept up with this thread but, is this really the > way the mod_perl list is going to go? I hope so. All these job postings are making me feel warm and fuzzy for the future. -- Dave Hodgkinson, Wizard for Hire http://www.daveh

Re: Apache Web Server vulnerability

2002-06-21 Thread Richard Čepas
On Wed Jun 19 17:54:02 2002 +0400 Igor Sysoev wrote: >On 19 Jun 2002, Ilya Martynov wrote: > >> If you still do not know about it: >> >> http://httpd.apache.org/info/security_bulletin_20020617.txt >> >> Now mod_perl question. mod_perl servers often are used as backend >> servers. I.e. they

Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Phil Dobbin
On 20/6/02 at 20:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Mornini) wrote: > We're 1 year into development of a system that is OO Perl, mod_perl, > DBI and DBD::Oracle on Linux. > > We've spent a lot of energy doing it right and writing tests as we go. > This has given us huge benefits in the life of the proje