stas2002/07/01 00:08:45
Modified:xs/Apache/Filter Apache__Filter.h
Log:
fix a typo: s/output/input/
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +1 -1 modperl-2.0/xs/Apache/Filter/Apache__Filter.h
Index: Apache__Filter.h
However, if the structure were
http://bigmegamarket.com/index.pl/56765454151/grocery/fruits/bananas,
say, with the number being the session ID, the URL then is hackable
within that (good) definition.
Yes, however there are quite a number of issues with bookmarks and
search engines... But
browser sent the credentials, or leave $ENV{REMOTE_USER} undef
otherwise, without sending a 401 back.
I didn't think a browser would send authentication unless the server
requested it for an authentication domain. How are you going to
get some people to send the credentials and some
On 29 Jun 2002 01:46:00 +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:38:25 -0500, Stephen Clouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
SC On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 01:09:21PM +0100, Peter Haworth wrote:
The GPL doesn't restrict use, only distribution.
SC I believe you need to read it again.
Greetings.
Nigel Peck wrote:
Thanks for the help. When did I reply to you privately?
This was just to reiterate for everybody to keep the threads on the
list. Since many times those who respond to the questions, suffer
afterwards because people decide that the person answering
the
Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
Greetings.
Nigel Peck wrote:
Thanks for the help. When did I reply to you privately?
This was just to reiterate for everybody to keep the threads on the
list. Since many times those who respond to the questions, suffer
afterwards because people decide that the
Thanks to everyone giving their hints and help. I will try to search the
archive again Jean-Michel as it looks v. similar. At the moment I'm lucky
that I got my data in the url so in the end I just applied a regex.
Cheers,
Tim
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: param
From: Jean-Michel Hiver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh but I have that already. I know that I need to password protect
/properties.html
/content.html
/move.html
/foo/properties.html
/foo/content.html
/foo/move.html
etc...
Is it possible to password-protect a class of URIs using regexes? That
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 10:30:36AM +0100, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
browser sent the credentials, or leave $ENV{REMOTE_USER} undef
otherwise, without sending a 401 back.
I didn't think a browser would send authentication unless the server
requested it for an authentication domain.
Thanks to the list and two days of hard work, I have my optional HTTP
authentication thingie working :-)
Basically here is how it looks in my apache config file:
# This method handler ensures that users must enter their credentials
# for any URI which looks like /foo/bar/login.html
Hi there,
On 30 Jun 2002, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
What? The EU is going to make cookies *illegal*? I highly doubt this.
There is already EU legislation which might make the use of cookies suspect.
It concerns, for example, the monitoring of individual keyboard operators
to measure their
Jean-Michel Hiver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, if the structure were
http://bigmegamarket.com/index.pl/56765454151/grocery/fruits/bananas,
say, with the number being the session ID, the URL then is hackable
within that (good) definition.
Yes, however there are quite a number
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm +1 on using a preset 'Reply-to:' header. httpd-dev seems to use it
solely for the reason you describe. I'm all for helping people to
reply back to the list. Ask, can we please have this header set?
Can we please *not*?
--
David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL
Hello everyone,
I'm attempting to implement Apache::LogFile on our production servers and
running into some problems.
It seems to work fine on our development server, which is running Apache
1.3.20, except for the fact that we can no longer issue 'apachectl restart',
we have to stop and
On our production server, we are running Apache 1.3.24, and I cannot get the
webserver to start with the Apache::LogFile code in the conf file. It always
dies with the above error, whether I stop and start or just restart.
The relavant lines from the httpd.conf file are:
--
Has anyone noticed any performance problems using 1.3.26 as the front
end proxy to a backend mod_perl server?
I upgraded a box running apache 1.3.22 as the frontend proxy to 1.3.26.
Prior to upgrading the load was ~2.0 - 3.0. After upgrading, the load
went up to around 21 - 25. I then
E Kolve [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone noticed any performance problems using 1.3.26 as the front
end proxy to a backend mod_perl server?
I upgraded a box running apache 1.3.22 as the frontend proxy to
1.3.26. Prior to upgrading the load was ~2.0 - 3.0. After upgrading,
the load
I was watching the apache scoreboard file and it appeared the the
mod_perl process was not being immediately freed by the proxy. Normally
there will be 3 or 4 mod_perl procs in mode W Sending Reply, but after
around 20 - 30 seconds on 1.3.26 as the proxy all 30 (that is my
MaxClients for
I downloaded IndigoPerl. I started theApache server and it says at the top of it
[warn] pid file c:/unzipped/indigoperl5-6/logs/gttpd.pid overwritten -- unclean shutdown of previous Apache run?
Apache/1.3.20 (Win32) mod_perl1.25 running...
but when I try to type something it doesn't respond.
Melissa,
You can ignore the unclean shutdown message - it just means Apache wasn't stopped
gracefully via the command to stop it. On windows, I always do ctrl-c to stop it.
For production, you will probably install it as a service and use the services
controller(in Administrative Tools of
stas2002/07/01 08:17:09
Modified:htdocs/manual/mod mod_perl.html
Log:
tidy up the mod_perl manual to comply with xhtml standard:
% tidy -mi -asxml -wrap 80 mod_perl.html
Submitted by: Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +751 -661
21 matches
Mail list logo
