Hi,
You know I was all ready on my dev box to start messing around with apache2,
when we had a major evil thing happen on our fancy server. So my dev box had
to become our server. And because I have not had any personal experence with
apache 2, I converted everthing back to 1.x on the dev box.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Eric Frazier wrote:
On that note, how about just using Apache2 for the proxy front end, and
mod_perl /apache 1.x for the back end? I have wanted to try to avoid the
thttpd stuff for images and from what I have heard about apache2 it can
handle
Nick Tonkin wrote:
Hmm, I think it all depends on the application. It's true that hardware
costs have declined since The Days, but you still don't have unlimited
RAM.
True, there is an upper limit on per-machine scalability with a
multi-process server and thttpd would do better there if the
Stas Bekman wrote:
Where did you see the benchmarks showing that Apache 2.0 has a better
performance than 1.3?
All over!
Joshua's numbers from this list:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperlm=103238123915307w=2
Some good graphs, including thttpd:
Perrin Harkins wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Where did you see the benchmarks showing that Apache 2.0 has a better
performance than 1.3?
All over!
Thanks Perrin.
[...]
Some good graphs, including thttpd:
http://www.zeuscat.com/andrew/work/aprbench/
It shows that threaded mpm's throughput
Hey Stas,
PHSome good graphs, including thttpd:
PHhttp://www.zeuscat.com/andrew/work/aprbench/
SBIt shows that threaded mpm's throughput is worse than preforked, which
SBsounds dubious unless things were broken (blocking mutexes). Hopefully
SBsomeone can run a benchmark on more updated versions
hi, sorry my english ;)
modperl 2 with apache 2 thread is stable enought for start one big
project of ecommerce?
[]s
nattis
Hi there,
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Udlei Nattis wrote:
hi, sorry my english ;)
It's ok. :)
modperl 2 with apache 2 thread is stable enought for start one big
project of ecommerce?
If it were my decision I'd say not yet, use mod_perl 1.27 with Apache 1.3.27.
73,
Ged.
Ged Haywood wrote:
modperl 2 with apache 2 thread is stable enought for start one big
project of ecommerce?
If it were my decision I'd say not yet, use mod_perl 1.27 with Apache 1.3.27.
It depends on your needs. The majority of the features is there and should
work just fine. The stability
Hi,
On that note, how about just using Apache2 for the proxy front end, and
mod_perl /apache 1.x for the back end? I have wanted to try to avoid the
thttpd stuff for images and from what I have heard about apache2 it can
handle static pages a lot faster than the 1.x did.
Thanks,
Eric
At
Eric Frazier wrote:
On that note, how about just using Apache2 for the proxy front end, and
mod_perl /apache 1.x for the back end? I have wanted to try to avoid the
thttpd stuff for images and from what I have heard about apache2 it can
handle static pages a lot faster than the 1.x did.
You
Perrin Harkins wrote:
Eric Frazier wrote:
On that note, how about just using Apache2 for the proxy front end, and
mod_perl /apache 1.x for the back end? I have wanted to try to avoid the
thttpd stuff for images and from what I have heard about apache2 it can
handle static pages a lot faster
12 matches
Mail list logo
