Re: Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-24 Thread Stas Bekman
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Lupe Christoph wrote: > Hello! > > Sorry about the lack of response. I was very busy the last few days. > > On Tuesday, 2000-08-22 at 11:26:00 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Lupe Christoph wrote: > > > > I thought about it a little more. What is does is

Re: Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-24 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Wednesday, 2000-08-23 at 12:32:58 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > [...] > > > Sorry, it's in contrib, not the book: > > > http://perl.apache.org/dist/contrib/Timeit.pm > > And I have an improved version

Re: Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-24 Thread Lupe Christoph
Hello! Sorry about the lack of response. I was very busy the last few days. On Tuesday, 2000-08-22 at 11:26:00 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: > On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Lupe Christoph wrote: > > I thought about it a little more. What is does is find the > > (cpu|real)time taken to process a request. So

Re: Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-23 Thread Stas Bekman
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > [...] > > Sorry, it's in contrib, not the book: > > http://perl.apache.org/dist/contrib/Timeit.pm > > And I have an improved version which I for some reason never > uploaded to CPAN. I guess I didn't get

Re: Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-23 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: [...] > Sorry, it's in contrib, not the book: > http://perl.apache.org/dist/contrib/Timeit.pm And I have an improved version which I for some reason never uploaded to CPAN. I guess I didn't get everything I wanted to work to work. :) Next time I need it I'

Re: Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-22 Thread George Sanderson
At 11:26 AM 8/22/00 +0200, you wrote: >On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Lupe Christoph wrote: > >> On Monday, 2000-08-21 at 21:06:54 -0400, Greg Stark wrote: >> >> > Lupe Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > > Hmm. Apache::Benchmark sounds more like a benchmark driver to me. >> > > Apache::Instrume

Re: Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-22 Thread Stas Bekman
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Monday, 2000-08-21 at 21:06:54 -0400, Greg Stark wrote: > > > Lupe Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Hmm. Apache::Benchmark sounds more like a benchmark driver to me. > > > Apache::Instrumentation or so? Apache::Probe? > > > Profile o

Re: Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-22 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Monday, 2000-08-21 at 10:41:51 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Lupe Christoph wrote: > > > A few comments followed by the answer to your original question. > > Thanks! > > > make install > > Manifying blib/man3/Apache::Changes.

Re: Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-21 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Monday, 2000-08-21 at 21:06:54 -0400, Greg Stark wrote: > Lupe Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hmm. Apache::Benchmark sounds more like a benchmark driver to me. > > Apache::Instrumentation or so? Apache::Probe? > Profile or even just Prof. I thought about it a little more. What is

Re: Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-21 Thread Greg Stark
Lupe Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm. Apache::Benchmark sounds more like a benchmark driver to me. > Apache::Instrumentation or so? Apache::Probe? Profile or even just Prof. I looked at this and really like the idea. Unfortunately I need to recompile my Apache to use it. What I th

Re: Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-21 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Monday, 2000-08-21 at 10:41:51 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Lupe Christoph wrote: > A few comments followed by the answer to your original question. Thanks! > make install > Manifying blib/man3/Apache::Changes.3 > Manifying blib/man3/Apache::Perfmon.3 > Manifying blib/man

Re: Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-21 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Sunday, 2000-08-20 at 23:45:55 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > Lupe, > > It seems to be broken. I cannot open the package. > > I've uploaded it again, and will be testing it myself. > > To be sure you get it, I'm attaching the tarball, it's minor

Apache::Perfmon 0.011

2000-08-20 Thread Lupe Christoph
Thanks to Balazs Rauznitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for pointing out an embarrasing thinko. The corrected version is at http://free.prohosting.com/~lupe/Personal/Perl/Apache-Perfmon/Apache-Perfmon-0.011.tar.gz Sorry if you already grabbed this. Lupe Christoph -- | [EMAIL PRO