Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-22 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Slava Bizyayev wrote: I will patch FAQ with this shortly. Well but what does HTTP/1.1 support mean ? As far as I know the compressing has not any HTTP/1.1 specific features. mod_deflate compresses content using 8K buffer. When the buffer is filled mod_deflate passes

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Slava Bizyayev wrote: Here is small correction to Web Content Compression FAQ. What does HTTP/1.0 only support mean in this answer: Q: Are there any content compression solutions for vanilla Apache 1.3.X? A: Yes, There are two compression modules written in C

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-21 Thread Slava Bizyayev
Thank you Igor, I will patch FAQ with this shortly. Slava - Original Message - From: Igor Sysoev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Slava Bizyayev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 5:19 AM Subject: Re: Content compression FAQ

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-20 Thread Stas Bekman
Slava Bizyayev wrote: Oops, sorry for that. It should be OK now. http://devl4.outlook.net/devdoc/FAQ/compression.pod Thanks, committed __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-19 Thread Slava Bizyayev
Thanks Stas! Full POD file is available now at http://devl4.outlook.net/devdoc/FAQ/compression.pod Slava - Original Message - From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 12:42 AM Subject: Re: Content compression FAQ Great work, Slava. Please send the diff

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-19 Thread Stas Bekman
, July 14, 2003 12:42 AM Subject: Re: Content compression FAQ Great work, Slava. Please send the diff (or probably just the whole thing), or the URL where we can download it from and we'll update http://perl.apache.org/docs/tutorials/client/compression/compression.html

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-19 Thread Slava Bizyayev
Oops, sorry for that. It should be OK now. ;-( Slava - Original Message - From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Slava Bizyayev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: mod_perl Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 3:29 PM Subject: Re: Content compression FAQ Slava Bizyayev

Re: [mod_perl] Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Ross Matt-QMR000 wrote: I like to be removed from this list but the un-scribe does not work for me. the problem is the mail address that I used way back when has been aliases. the list's help email explains how to unsubscribe from a different address, post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the details. If

RE: [mod_perl] Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-14 Thread Ross Matt-QMR000
Mailing List Subject: Re: [mod_perl] Re: Content compression FAQ At 04/07/2003 17:29, Slava Bizyayev wrote: I've just updated the content at http://devl4.outlook.net/devdoc/FAQ/compression.html . It's very good Slava. Concise, informative and thorough. There is a small mistake in the section, Q

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-13 Thread Stas Bekman
Slava Bizyayev wrote: Hi everyone, I've just updated the content at http://devl4.outlook.net/devdoc/FAQ/compression.html . It is supposed to be a final version, unless I missed something important. Great work, Slava. Please send the diff (or probably just the whole thing), or the URL where we

Re: [mod_perl] Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-11 Thread Jonathan M. Hollin
At 04/07/2003 17:29, Slava Bizyayev wrote: I've just updated the content at http://devl4.outlook.net/devdoc/FAQ/compression.html . It's very good Slava. Concise, informative and thorough. There is a small mistake in the section, Q: How hard is it to implement content compression on an existing

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-04 Thread Slava Bizyayev
Hi everyone, I've just updated the content at http://devl4.outlook.net/devdoc/FAQ/compression.html . It is supposed to be a final version, unless I missed something important. Please let me know then. Thanks, Slava

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-01 Thread Slava Bizyayev
It should not be considered a bugfix anymore. It is NOT required to do, because that particular story with M$IE is over. Recently, there were some problems with M$IE reported, namely a partially lost compressed content when using SSL over HTTP/1.1. It happens infrequently. The problem remains in

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-07-01 Thread David Dick
Slava Bizyayev wrote: It should not be considered a bugfix anymore. It is NOT required to do, because that particular story with M$IE is over. Sounds like we agree to disagree on this one. My opinion would be, if there is a known problem with a browser version that can be solved with a

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-06-24 Thread Slava Bizyayev
- From: Nigel Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Slava Bizyayev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: mod_perl Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:27 AM Subject: Re: Content compression FAQ HI SLava, Your new FAQ looks really good! I've just got one small suggestion. I've heard

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-06-23 Thread Slava Bizyayev
don't mind... Thanks, Slava - Original Message - From: Slava Bizyayev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mod_perl Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:10 AM Subject: Content compression FAQ Hello everyone again, This thread is supposed to improve Content Compression FAQ

Re: Content compression FAQ

2003-06-23 Thread Nigel Hamilton
... Thanks, Slava - Original Message - From: Slava Bizyayev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mod_perl Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:10 AM Subject: Content compression FAQ Hello everyone again, This thread is supposed to improve Content Compression FAQ

Content compression FAQ

2003-06-17 Thread Slava Bizyayev
Hello everyone again, This thread is supposed to improve Content Compression FAQ at http://perl.apache.org/docs/tutorials/client/compression/compression.html in order to assist Practical mod_perl as Stas suggested. Any of your questions, suggestions, concerns, and/or criticisms of FAQ would