Hi there,
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
> I sure can co-maintain such a document. The "co" part is a good idea for
> several reasons - the most cogent being that I am not a native speaker
Heck, you write English better than many Englishmen I know...
73,
Ged.
Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Stas> so if Alessandro or Randy volunteers (please say so), please
> Stas> ask winXX
> Stas> users to send you more winXX specific notes/scenarios and you (the
> Stas> volunteer) will be the official maintainer of the doc and send
me the
> Stas
Greetings.
Stas> so if Alessandro or Randy volunteers (please say so), please
Stas> ask winXX
Stas> users to send you more winXX specific notes/scenarios and you (the
Stas> volunteer) will be the official maintainer of the doc and send me the
Stas> new doc and then the future patches. For 2.0 you
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Don't modify the guide, just throw some random and structured winXX
> notes into a new doc,and we just add it to the guide as a new chapter.
> Then people start sending patches and polish it, like the rest of the
> chapters. The new 2.0 docs generation wi
Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
>
>
>>Greetings.
>>
>>Randy> That's great that you thought this out and put it together;
>>Randy> a few comments below appear below ...
>>
>>Thanks for playing editor - and I am accepting all of your suggestions,
>>with the p
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Randy> That's great that you thought this out and put it together;
> Randy> a few comments below appear below ...
>
> Thanks for playing editor - and I am accepting all of your suggestions,
> with the possible exception of what fol
Greetings.
Randy> That's great that you thought this out and put it together;
Randy> a few comments below appear below ...
Thanks for playing editor - and I am accepting all of your suggestions,
with the possible exception of what follows.
Randy> I got confused about which is the "first" and wh
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> [...]
> > > This documentation patch addresses the single thread snafu on Win32.
> > > Comments, corrections and additions (even subtractions)
> > >welcome. (Also on the hot topic of the day: where in the doc does this
> fit?)
> >
Greetings.
[...]
> > This documentation patch addresses the single thread snafu on Win32.
> > Comments, corrections and additions (even subtractions)
> >welcome. (Also on the hot topic of the day: where in the doc does this
fit?)
>
> Nice, but please repost it inlined. Otherwise people won't be a
Greetings.
This
documentation patch addresses the single thread snafu
on Win32.
Comments, corrections and additions
(even subtractions) welcome. (Also on the hot topic of the day: where in the doc
does this fit?)
Cheers,
alf
modperl_multithread_NT.pod
Description: Binary data
10 matches
Mail list logo
