At 09:32 AM 12/15/00 -0300, you wrote:
Jeremy Howard wrote:
IMHO, the best open source WebMail servers are PHP based
I have this dangling idea of building a TWIG lookalike (in Perl), with
a 'plug-in'/'module' structure, so I may write the email client, and
others fill with their desired
On Fri Dec 15 11:28:03 2000 -0800 brian moseley wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING?
It's a pretty powerful system and it was designed for
mod_perl. Look it up on CPAN.
it's an option, but it's got a
Jeremy Howard wrote:
IMHO, the best open source WebMail servers are PHP based
true, I am using and patching TWIG quite a lot, and that made me see how
messy PHP gets when dealing with libraries and things. It's not nice to
see a large app written in PHP... at least not this one.
I have
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
I have this dangling idea of building a TWIG
lookalike (in Perl), with a 'plug-in'/'module'
structure, so I may write the email client, and others
fill with their desired modules. Anyway, it's a seriuos
undertaking, but it's in my plans to
brian moseley wrote:
(speaking as the author of a proprietary mod_perl
webmail...)
DO IT!!
my fear is that writing it as a mod_perl app, it'd be terribly niche,
and we wouldn't get it rolling. I'd rather write a bunch of modules,
that can be called from a CGI or a templating
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
brian moseley wrote:
(speaking as the author of a proprietary mod_perl
webmail...)
DO IT!!
my fear is that writing it as a mod_perl app, it'd be terribly niche,
and we wouldn't get it rolling. I'd rather write a bunch of modules,
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
I have this dangling idea of building a TWIG lookalike (in Perl), with
a 'plug-in'/'module' structure, so I may write the email client, and
others fill with their desired modules.
Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING? It's a
martin langhoff wrote:
brian moseley wrote:
(speaking as the author of a proprietary mod_perl
webmail...)
DO IT!!
my fear is that writing it as a mod_perl app, it'd be terribly niche,
and we wouldn't get it rolling. I'd rather write a bunch of modules,
that can be called
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING?
It's a pretty powerful system and it was designed for
mod_perl. Look it up on CPAN.
it's an option, but it's got a large amount of dependencies,
which makes it a tremendous effort for me to
On Fri Dec 15 11:28:03 2000 -0800 brian moseley wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING?
It's a pretty powerful system and it was designed for
mod_perl. Look it up on CPAN.
it's an option, but it's got a large amount
At 11:28 15/12/2000 -0800, brian moseley wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING?
It's a pretty powerful system and it was designed for
mod_perl. Look it up on CPAN.
it's an option, but it's got a large amount of dependencies,
Perrin Harkins wrote:
Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING?
I've seen TWIG and its *very* clever, if ugly. It'll let you
authenticate against a lot of things. Use IMAP or POP. Use News. Use
mysql, Postgres, MySQL, or none. Use cookies or encoded links for state.
It's *very*
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Robin Berjon wrote:
Wing has been widely tested in the field iirc, it's
probably a good idea to base anything in that domain on
it.
possibly. groupware applications aren't that complex really,
tho (except for calendaring and scheduling); the main
problem is that they're
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
Perrin Harkins wrote:
Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING?
I've seen TWIG and its *very* clever, if ugly. It'll let you
authenticate against a lot of things. Use IMAP or POP. Use News. Use
mysql, Postgres, MySQL, or none.
At 12:23 15/12/2000 -0800, brian moseley wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Robin Berjon wrote:
Wing has been widely tested in the field iirc, it's
probably a good idea to base anything in that domain on
it.
possibly. groupware applications aren't that complex really,
tho (except for calendaring
Hi
- Original Message -
From: "George Sanderson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 22:47
Subject: RFC: Email (mod_perl) Apache module?
The module would allow the users to read and send email.
Now that would be advocacy;-)
No, that would be spam.
--
\js
Leon Brocard wrote:
Jeremy Howard sent the following bits through the ether:
IMHO, the best open source WebMail servers are PHP based:
In Perl, there's also WING: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mbeattie/wing/ and
my oh-my-god-it's-still-in-development-and-I'm-still-breaking-
I think it would be cool to have an email Apache module. I was thinking
that if the URL was something like:
http://www.site.com/user/mail
it would activate the module.
The module would allow the users to read and send email. Kind of like how
I did Apache::FileMan (an Apache web site file
George Sanderson wrote:
I think it would be cool to have an email Apache module. I was thinking
that if the URL was something like:
http://www.site.com/user/mail
it would activate the module.
The module would allow the users to read and send email. Kind of like how
I did
19 matches
Mail list logo
