>Talking about "let's do something" topics on the mod_perl list is a waste
>of time, unfortunately... The motto of this list regarding new things is
>"think it, implement it and give it"...
This is somewhat too straightforward, Stas. Look - I only suggested there
should be another name and anoth
"The association between the image of a white-tailed eagle and the
topic of Apache modules is a trademark of O'Reilly & Associates."
Jim
On Dec 04, Victor Zamouline wrote:
> >Talking about "let's do something" topics on the mod_perl list is a waste
> >of time, unfortunately... The motto of this
>"The association between the image of a white-tailed eagle and the
>topic of Apache modules is a trademark of O'Reilly & Associates."
So it is either a question of getting O'Reilly's authorization, or
abandonning the eagle idea. Stats proposed a hedgehog. John Burns proposed a
red brick base of
>"The association between the image of a white-tailed eagle and the
>topic of Apache modules is a trademark of O'Reilly & Associates."
The association between Camel and Perl is also O'Reilly's trademark, yet we
see a camel on www.perl.com, right?
Vic.
>>"The association between the image of a white-tailed eagle and the
>>topic of Apache modules is a trademark of O'Reilly & Associates."
>
>
>The association between Camel and Perl is also O'Reilly's trademark, yet we
>see a camel on www.perl.com, right?
>
>Vic.
>
www.perl.com is O'Reilly's site.
On Dec 04, Victor Zamouline wrote:
> >"The association between the image of a white-tailed eagle and the
> >topic of Apache modules is a trademark of O'Reilly & Associates."
>
> The association between Camel and Perl is also O'Reilly's trademark, yet we
> see a camel on www.perl.com, right?
This
At 01:12 04/12/1999 +0100, Victor Zamouline wrote:
>>Talking about "let's do something" topics on the mod_perl list is a waste
>>of time, unfortunately... The motto of this list regarding new things is
>>"think it, implement it and give it"...
>
>This is somewhat too straightforward, Stas. Look -
At 01:46 04/12/1999 +0100, Victor Zamouline wrote:
>>"The association between the image of a white-tailed eagle and the
>>topic of Apache modules is a trademark of O'Reilly & Associates."
>
>So it is either a question of getting O'Reilly's authorization, or
>abandonning the eagle idea.
I don't t
I have browsed my graphic libraries and put some eagles and other birds at:
http://www.jazzvalley.com/modperl/symbols/index.html
I am not a graphist, but those willing to make a sketch of a logo (assuming
there is an eagle on it) may use some of that stuff.
No idea about any copyright of these
> I have browsed my graphic libraries and put some eagles and other birds at:
>
> http://www.jazzvalley.com/modperl/symbols/index.html
>
> I am not a graphist, but those willing to make a sketch of a logo (assuming
> there is an eagle on it) may use some of that stuff.
I loved the drawings as t
- Original Message -
From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Victor Zamouline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 1999 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: Logo / brand
> > I have browsed my graphic libr
>Eagle on top of camel and the Apache feather somewhere in a middle...
>probably too complicated for a small scaled logo...
I am afraid, yes. We have not yet reached any opinion on whether the logo
should represent a "bridge" or an "independent product". In the case of an
"independent product",
At 20:51 +0100 99.12.4, Victor Zamouline wrote:
> >Eagle on top of camel and the Apache feather somewhere in a middle...
> >probably too complicated for a small scaled logo...
>
>
> I am afraid, yes. We have not yet reached any opinion on whether the logo
> should represent a "bridge" or an "ind
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bill Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 1999 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: mod_perl Programmers demand is going up...
Ken wrote:
> I'd rather see a camel with wings. Seems like an
At 00:28 -0700 99.12.5, Michael Dearman wrote:
> David Emery wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > Personally, I think the name mod_perl should be kept, and mod_perl hackers should
>start referring to themselves as "The Mod Squad". A logo could be created based on
>the shape of Linc's hair from the Mod
Victor Zamouline wrote:
>
> >Talking about "let's do something" topics on the mod_perl list is a waste
> >of time, unfortunately... The motto of this list regarding new things is
> >"think it, implement it and give it"...
>
> This is somewhat too straightforward, Stas. Look - I only suggested
> >"The association between the image of a white-tailed eagle and the
> >topic of Apache modules is a trademark of O'Reilly & Associates."
>
> The association between Camel and Perl is also O'Reilly's trademark, yet we
> see a camel on www.perl.com, right?
perl.com is an O'Reilly site. They can
17 matches
Mail list logo
