OT: secure mod_perl enabled apache on MacOSX 10.1

2001-10-03 Thread Ray Zimmerman
I suppose this is slightly off-topic for both lists I'm posting to, but I don't know of a better place to ask ... I've been able to build a mod_perl enabled apache (not DSO) for Mac OS X 10.1 and it seems to work fine. Now I'd like to include the apple_hfs_module or hfs_apple_module that Apple

Re: OT: secure mod_perl enabled apache on MacOSX 10.1

2001-10-03 Thread Ray Zimmerman
At 11:24 AM -0700 10/3/01, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote: >On Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 11:10 AM, Ray Zimmerman wrote: > >>I've been able to build a mod_perl enabled apache (not DSO) for Mac >>OS X 10.1 and it seems to work fine. Now I'd like to include the >>apple_hfs_module or hfs_apple_module

Re: OT: secure mod_perl enabled apache on MacOSX 10.1

2001-10-03 Thread Ray Zimmerman
At 2:23 PM -0400 10/3/01, John Siracusa wrote: >On Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 02:10 PM, Ray Zimmerman wrote: >>I've been able to build a mod_perl enabled apache (not DSO) for Mac >>OS X 10.1 and it seems to work fine. > >Would it be too much trouble for you to post a complete, >step-by-step

Re: OT: secure mod_perl enabled apache on MacOSX 10.1

2001-10-03 Thread John Siracusa
On Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 05:03 PM, Ray Zimmerman wrote: > At 2:23 PM -0400 10/3/01, John Siracusa wrote: >> On Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 02:10 PM, Ray Zimmerman wrote: >>> I've been able to build a mod_perl enabled apache (not DSO) >>> for Mac OS X 10.1 and it seems to work fine.

Re: OT: secure mod_perl enabled apache on MacOSX 10.1

2001-10-03 Thread John Siracusa
On Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 02:10 PM, Ray Zimmerman wrote: > I've been able to build a mod_perl enabled apache (not DSO) for > Mac OS X 10.1 and it seems to work fine. Would it be too much trouble for you to post a complete, step-by-step account of exactly what you did you accomplish th

Re: OT: secure mod_perl enabled apache on MacOSX 10.1

2001-10-03 Thread Wilfredo Sanchez
On Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 11:10 AM, Ray Zimmerman wrote: > I've been able to build a mod_perl enabled apache (not DSO) for Mac OS > X 10.1 and it seems to work fine. Now I'd like to include the > apple_hfs_module or hfs_apple_module that Apple included as a DSO in > the standard inst

Re: OT: secure mod_perl enabled apache on MacOSX 10.1

2001-10-11 Thread Ken Williams
Joe, The problem is that Apple has made some strange changes to the way shared libraries are linked. I'm not very conversant in the details, but there are some people on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list that have discussed it. Unfortunately, Apache::Request and Apache::Cookie don't define any tests

Re: OT: secure mod_perl enabled apache on MacOSX 10.1

2001-10-04 Thread Joe Schaefer
John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > P.S.- d) Apache::Request and Apache::Cookie still can't be > loaded simultaneously! :( Why not? Does it work OK with a statically-linked mod_perl? -- Joe Schaefer

Re: OT: secure mod_perl enabled apache on MacOSX 10.1

2001-10-04 Thread John Siracusa
On 10/4/01 9:26 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> P.S.- d) Apache::Request and Apache::Cookie still can't be >> loaded simultaneously! :( > > Why not? Run-time symbol conflict. > Does it work OK with a statically-linked mod_perl? I've never heard of anyone