Hi all,
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Randy Kobes wrote:
The :: are stripped on the fly, since these cannot be used in index, so
when you look for Foo::Bar you are actually looking for 'Foo Bar'.
That's a limitation of swish-e - you can configure it to
index characters like $, !, ... as part of
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Randy Kobes wrote:
Another thing that was configured in is that words have
to be at least 3 characters long, which seems reasonable,
and also there's some stopwords that don't get indexed,
as they're too common. This list of stopwords is built
by hand - so far it only
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Randy Kobes wrote:
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
looks good... one minor issue with the stickyness of the next search
feature:
type "lexical file handles" in your original search. the "es" at the
end
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Ged Haywood wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Randy Kobes wrote:
The :: are stripped on the fly, since these cannot be used in index, so
when you look for Foo::Bar you are actually looking for 'Foo Bar'.
That's a limitation of swish-e - you can configure
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Randy Kobes wrote:
Another thing that was configured in is that words have
to be at least 3 characters long, which seems reasonable,
and also there's some stopwords that don't get indexed,
as they're too common. This list
That would be nice to see. I'm afraid I'll continue on working on guide.
So if there anyone with a few free minutes on his hands, he/she might like
to contribute something back to community ;)
Ideally, when we complete the tuning of the search engine, we will be able
to have the whole
That would be nice to see. I'm afraid I'll continue on working on guide.
So if there anyone with a few free minutes on his hands, he/she might like
to contribute something back to community ;)
Ideally, when we complete the tuning of the search engine, we will be able
to have the whole
hi,
very interesting. Search for : "statinc" returns nothing and the box get filled
with "tatinc" instead "statinc" ?!?!:")
this under KDE viewer, now will try netscape ...!!
On Fri, 19 May 2000, raptor wrote:
hi,
very interesting. Search for : "statinc" returns nothing and the box get filled
with "tatinc" instead "statinc" ?!?!:")
this under KDE viewer, now will try netscape ...!!
it's not the client -- it's a bug.
This happened after Randy has made
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Fri, 19 May 2000, raptor wrote:
hi,
very interesting. Search for : "statinc" returns nothing and the box get filled
with "tatinc" instead "statinc" ?!?!:")
this under KDE viewer, now will try netscape ...!!
it's not the client --
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
Ok, We have a preview ready for you. Randy Kobes worked hard to prepare
this one. So your comments are very welcome. If you like it we'll put this
into production.
Please keep either the list CC'ed or if you reply to me in person, make
sure you
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
Ok, We have a preview ready for you. Randy Kobes worked hard to prepare
this one. So your comments are very welcome. If you like it we'll put this
into production.
Please keep either the list CC'ed or if you reply to me in person, make
sure you
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Looks cool, except can we take the guide splitting back 1 level? It
seems to be split on =head2's, and should be split (IMO) on =head1's.
The reason for splitting on any =head level lies in fact that there are
huge sections under =head1 which have
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
One more point... The indexer or the searcher (or both) has a broken
tokenizer for anything involving perl. Try searching for
Apache::Constants, for example.
That's right. It's broken :( After searching
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, We have a preview ready for you. Randy Kobes worked hard to prepare
this one. So your comments are very welcome. If you like it we'll put this
into production.
Please keep either the list CC'ed or if you reply to me in person, make
sure you
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Jeremy Howard wrote:
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, We have a preview ready for you. Randy Kobes worked hard to prepare
this one. So your comments are very welcome. If you like it we'll put this
into production.
Please keep either the list CC'ed or if
16 matches
Mail list logo
