Re: another article on perl.com

2002-02-27 Thread Joe Brenner
clayton cottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what about slashdot and perlmonks? When I finish reading the "Mod_perl Developer's Cookbook", I was planning on writing a review and submitting it to slashdot (presuming no one beats me to it). I'm not calling dibs or anything, just making a pr

Re: another article on perl.com

2002-02-27 Thread clayton cottingham
Stas Bekman wrote: > > Keith G. Murphy wrote: > > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > >>If you know of other prospective magazines looking for articles please > >>let me know. > >> > > > > Well, on the web side of things, there's this: > > > > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/ > > > > They have a fair

Re: another article on perl.com

2002-02-27 Thread Issac Goldstand
[snip] > Just to assure you, 99.9% of the old code will run as is. Though there > are many new things ;) > Actually, that's what I'm interested in... I've mentioned on the IRC room on a number of occasions, that I'd like to try to use the new threaded interface to try to design some new innovat

Re: another article on perl.com

2002-02-27 Thread Andy Lester
> our book I haven't had the time to delve into 2.0 as much as I would like. that, >and with the > economy being what it is, my free time to get familiar with, contribute to, and work >with 2.0 is > practically null... > > of course, with proper funding, that could all change... I'll be glad t

Re: another article on perl.com

2002-02-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Keith G. Murphy wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > >>If you know of other prospective magazines looking for articles please >>let me know. >> > > Well, on the web side of things, there's this: > > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/ > > They have a fair number of decent articles, including one o

Re: another article on perl.com

2002-02-27 Thread Stas Bekman
oung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 5:34 PM > Subject: Re: another article on perl.com > > > >>Geoffrey Young wrote: >> >>>it seems mod_perl is gathering some serious momentum lately.

Re: another article on perl.com

2002-02-27 Thread Geoffrey Young
Issac Goldstand wrote: > > Can I humbly suggest some articles that would lead to a guide for mod_perl > 2? I'm actually a bit embarrassed to admit that this is more out of > personal laziness than real need... I've just been so swamped lately, I've > never gotten around to looking at the API for

Re: another article on perl.com

2002-02-27 Thread Issac Goldstand
therefore have no idea what to expect :-) But it's still a useful thing to have... Issac - Original Message - From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Geoffrey Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February

Re: another article on perl.com

2002-02-27 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Stas Bekman wrote: > > If you know of other prospective magazines looking for articles please > let me know. Well, on the web side of things, there's this: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/ They have a fair number of decent articles, including one on CGI.pm (under the "Linux" topic, for s

Re: another article on perl.com

2002-02-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: > it seems mod_perl is gathering some serious momentum lately... > > in addition to Paul's "Preventing Cross-site Scripting Attacks" > article last week > > http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2002/02/20/css.html > > we have a new article by Stas, "Why mod_perl?" > > http://perl.co