of bugs (witch were fixed in 5.7.0)
Best
Cb
- Original Message -
From: "Jauder Ho" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Bogomolnyi Constantin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: perl5.6 (was: Shared variables, inner subs and "our")
support. 5.6.0 has a lot of bugs (witch were fixed in 5.7.0)
Best
Cb
- Original Message -
From: "Jauder Ho" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Bogomolnyi Constantin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: perl5.6 (was: Shared variables, inner subs
modperl" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: perl5.6 (was: Shared variables, inner subs and "our")
Stas Bekman wrote:
our() and other perl5.6 new APIs are too early to be endorsed, as 5.6 is
not yet considered as a stable version for mod_perl
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Bogomolnyi Constantin wrote:
You should probably try 5.7.0 witch is much more stable than 5.6.0 (you
should not try unicode stuff , whitch is quite buggy)
I use 5.7.0 on all my production servers without any problems .
5.7.0 may have fixed some of the bugs of 5.6.0 but
Hi,
I was just tidying up an old mod_perl script which had some ugly "use
vars qw(...);" lines in it which I thought I'd replace with "our ...;".
I realise this isn't always a good idea since "our" is not intended as a
replacement for "use vars", but its often OK and I thought it would be
in my
not really answering your questions, but
Ragarding moving the "our()" statement out of the function --
--- Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(b) because I can't actually do what I just did above in my mod_perl
script!
Couldn't you, if you put the func's into a module and our()'d it
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Paul wrote:
not really answering your questions, but
Ragarding moving the "our()" statement out of the function --
--- Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(b) because I can't actually do what I just did above in my mod_perl
script!
Couldn't you, if you put the
Stas Bekman wrote:
our() and other perl5.6 new APIs are too early to be endorsed, as 5.6 is
not yet considered as a stable version for mod_perl production sites,
therefore the guide barely touches on it.
Would you recommend the use of perl5.6 with mod_perl? What you are
saying is making me
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
our() and other perl5.6 new APIs are too early to be endorsed, as 5.6 is
not yet considered as a stable version for mod_perl production sites,
therefore the guide barely touches on it.
Would you recommend the use of perl5.6
