Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)

2003-01-28 Thread Stas Bekman
Stephen Clouse wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 06:25:26PM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: Hmm, you have perl 5.8.0. How is it possible that you don't have CGI.pm, which is a part of the core? It's probably a perl installed from a vendor-supplied

Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)

2003-01-27 Thread benjamin mccall
don't know, but my pulled zilch! ... could the absence of the two modules be reason for the test errors? ben - Original message - From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: benjamin mccall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:25:26 +1100 Subject: Re: glitched install of mod_perl

Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)

2003-01-27 Thread benjamin mccall
Subject: Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08) benjamin mccall wrote: don't know, but my pulled zilch! ... could the absence of the two modules be reason for the test errors? There is only one module reported missing and it's CGI.pm. It has been included in the core of 5.6.x and 5.8.x

Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)

2003-01-27 Thread Stas Bekman
benjamin mccall wrote: sorry, Stas...my former isp bit the dust and slammed me over to monopolistic wolf, verizon. so, i had no access since your last post. well, mod_perl is up and running. apparently the 'perlio' issue was corrected by some simple authentication sweeps. as for the

Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)

2003-01-27 Thread Stephen Clouse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 06:25:26PM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: Hmm, you have perl 5.8.0. How is it possible that you don't have CGI.pm, which is a part of the core? It's probably a perl installed from a vendor-supplied package. You'd be amazed at

glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)

2003-01-26 Thread benjamin mccall
hi, i'm having a problem with building mod_perl. what follows is a snapshot of my procedure to administer the build: perl: 5.8 installed (mthread) apache2:(x.43) mod_perl-1.99_08]# perl Makefile.PL MP_AP_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache2 ... Reading Makefile.PL args from @ARGV MP_AP_PREFIX =

Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)

2003-01-26 Thread Stas Bekman
[benjamin, please always reply to the list, not to the poster who has answered your question, unless asked otherwise] benjamin mccall wrote: Thanks for the quick reply on this one, Stas. I ran the script, 'localhost' resulted. I applied the patch as you advised, and it seems as though (i'm

Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)

2003-01-26 Thread benjamin mccall
', and 'modules/cgi.t'. ben - Original message - From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: benjamin mccall [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:29:22 +1100 Subject: Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08) benjamin mccall wrote: Thanks for the quick reply on this one

Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)

2003-01-26 Thread Stas Bekman
benjamin mccall wrote: well, i edited the /etc/hosts file and it seemed to've done the trick. Earlier you said that the patch to Apache/TestConfig.pm has done the trick. but now it seems i'm taking heaps of test failures from 'make test' run. if apache is inactive, would that cause these

Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)

2003-01-26 Thread benjamin mccall
:59:20 +1100 Subject: Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08) benjamin mccall wrote: well, i edited the /etc/hosts file and it seemed to've done the trick. Earlier you said that the patch to Apache/TestConfig.pm has done the trick. but now it seems i'm taking heaps of test failures from

Re: glitched install of mod_perl (1.99.08)

2003-01-26 Thread Stas Bekman
benjamin mccall wrote: well, yes, by trick i meant that 'makefile.pl' and 'make make test' parts of the build proceeded rather normally. my loopback is up and running: ... loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436