Re: Acmemail vs WING (was Re: mod_perl-friendly webmail solutions?)

2000-08-23 Thread martin langhoff
entropic, is WING something I can deploy and configure/customize (like most webmail solutions) or should code the interface to get it to work? does it support imap folders and address books? martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Wing scales well. Its the 'imap' server where you

Re: Acmemail vs WING (was Re: mod_perl-friendly webmail solutions?)

2000-08-23 Thread brian moseley
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Wing scales well. Its the 'imap' server where you will > have issues. I use wing with imap-uw and about 50 > 'trusted' users. what issues will you have with the imap server? > I'm looking into a 'ldap' email alternative. But haven't > learned the

Re: Acmemail vs WING (was Re: mod_perl-friendly webmail solutions?)

2000-08-23 Thread entropic
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 02:51:22PM +0100, David Hodgkinson wrote: > > Leon! > > > Development will start again as soon as yapc::Europe is over and > > people get back from holiday, honest. Scalability will really only > > happen when I can get some beefy servers to test it on. >

Re: Acmemail vs WING (was Re: mod_perl-friendly webmail solutions?)

2000-08-23 Thread David Hodgkinson
Leon! > Development will start again as soon as yapc::Europe is over and > people get back from holiday, honest. Scalability will really only > happen when I can get some beefy servers to test it on. What are the scalability issues? I'm looking at the possiblity of doing this for some hundreds

Re: Acmemail vs WING (was Re: mod_perl-friendly webmail solutions?)

2000-08-23 Thread Leon Brocard
martin langhoff sent the following bits through the ether: > Acmemail is nicely documented, and seems 'ready to go' (tempting!), > although I fear it may not be as configurable as I want. Do you know > anything about it? As the main developer of acmemail, I'd actually go for WING - acmemail is

Acmemail vs WING (was Re: mod_perl-friendly webmail solutions?)

2000-08-23 Thread martin langhoff
I found the one that Luis suggested, (acmemail) and a few more, including WING. These 2 are the only ones programmed to take advantage of mod_perl. I fear the other ones are not mod_perl aware, so the may not be safe/efficient under mod_perl, so my choices are mainly between these two.

Re: mod_perl-friendly webmail solutions?

2000-08-22 Thread Stas Bekman
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, martin langhoff wrote: > hi, > > i'm looking around, searching webmail solutions that run without > problems under mod_perl. Although I know there are many, most of them > are not very mod_perl friendly. > > now, the actual questions are > > - is anyone

Re: mod_perl-friendly webmail solutions?

2000-08-22 Thread Luis Henrique Cassis Fagundes
Hi, I used acmemail in two projects and liked it. I didn't test it under mod_perl, but the code as I remember was developed to run under mod_perl and appeared to avoid all the common mod_perl traps. To create new users, I don't dedicated much time to find a better solution,

mod_perl-friendly webmail solutions?

2000-08-22 Thread martin langhoff
hi, i'm looking around, searching webmail solutions that run without problems under mod_perl. Although I know there are many, most of them are not very mod_perl friendly. now, the actual questions are - is anyone here running (successfuly) a mod_perl webmail?