What are you using to parse the request? CGI.pm?
Mark Maunder wrote:
This has got me stumped, any help is much appreciated:
I'm using IE6 and mod_perl 1.27 with apache 1.3.27. I have mod_rewrite
and mod_proxy and mod_gzip compiled into the server, but have now
disabled all of them until I sort
Slava Bizyayev wrote:
It should not be considered a bugfix anymore. It is NOT required to do,
because that particular story with M$IE is over.
Sounds like we agree to disagree on this one. My opinion would be, if
there is a known problem with a browser version that can be solved with
a
with deflate when possible.
Thanks,
Slava
- Original Message -
From: David Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Slava Bizyayev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: How practical is that Practical mod_perl?
ok, i thought you might have been referred
customers still include 17% Netscape 4 users, sigh ...
#
Thanks,
Slava
- Original Message -
From: David Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Slava Bizyayev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: How practical is that Practical mod_perl
you seem to be talking about two different things here.
firstly, do you want to protect your source code being viewed by other
people?
secondly, do you want to ensure that your code is only being run on
computers that you have authorised?
these are related problems, but each requires a
Last time I experimented with Server-Push, the only browser that
implemented it was Netscape 4.*. Mozilla didn't and IE didn't. Which
is a pity cos it's a really useful technique.
Perrin Harkins wrote:
Martin Moss wrote:
I was wondering if it is possible to Create a Handler that points a
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
The logic here is simpler:
1. store the new status code (just in case the script has changed it)
2. reset the status code to the one before the script execution
3. if the script has attempted to change the status by itself and
the execution status
Hmmm. Are you by any chance female? :)
Please don't mess about with file ownerships, groups, permissions and
things if you aren't sure of what you're doing. That's dangerous in a
Webserver and besides you can get in a real mess with the installation.
I'm probably just over-sensitive,
G'day Dean,
I just tried it and it seemed to work fine. (i just tried connecting to
my db instead and printed the value of $socket to STDERR). The only
question I have is where are $socket, $host and $port defined? They do
not seem to be local to the routine, so is it possible that is where
within the Apache server on
the Solaris and making the connection to the Socket server running on a
Window XP PC. Wonder if this may cause the problem.
Cheers,
Dean
-Original Message-
From: David Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2003 7:17 PM
To: dhfg
Cc: [EMAIL
(@_);
if ($return == PARTIAL_CONTENT) {
return OK;
} else {
return ($return);
}
}
END { }
1;
Uru
-Dave
Ged Haywood wrote:
Hi again,
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote:
not even getting a broken connection. So somehow mod_perl doesn't
_really_ think it's
this is probably evil, and apologies to those who have seen suspiciously
familiar code before, but is this possible?
package MyPrefix::Apache::Registry;
use strict;
BEGIN {
use Apache::Registry();
}
sub handler {
delete $INC{'Site.pm'};
# mess with @INC
require Site;
If I'm correct both Apache::PerlRun and Apache::Registry will have
problems in certain situations if we agree that ModPerl::Registry has
the correct logic for handling the execution status. If you can tell
otherwise please give me a test script that doesn't work under
ModPerl::Registry.
But in
Good Point. Forgot to mention that the error log is completely empty. :)
Ged Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote:
Got a bit of a weird set of behaviour with a mod_perl Apache::Registry
type script.
[snip]
More information about this error may
not even getting a broken connection. So somehow mod_perl doesn't
_really_ think it's an error.
Ged Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote:
Forgot to mention that the error log is completely empty. :)
Are you getting core dumps?
73,
Ged.
G'day all,
Got a bit of a weird set of behaviour with a mod_perl Apache::Registry
type script.
HISTORY:
I've been using MD5 digests of the html sent from my scripts as ETags,
hence saving an important bit of bandwidth. Got a little bit carried
away with the success of this project and
16 matches
Mail list logo
