why you should reply to the list

2003-08-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Perrin Harkins wrote: On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 18:41, Bruce Tennant wrote: Can we fix the list so that when a person replies, it defaults to the list address and not the posters? Read the following thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperlm=99790842623617w=2 Please advise on another

Re: why you should reply to the list

2003-08-27 Thread Perrin Harkins
Stas Bekman wrote: Please advise on another way to tell people to respond to the list and not in private. I used to receive much less off-list replies earlier. I actually couldn't care less what the reply-to header for the list is, since I will just reply all as I always have. I posted the

Re: why you should reply to the list

2003-08-27 Thread Larry Leszczynski
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: Please advise on another way to tell people to respond to the list and not in private. I used to receive much less off-list replies earlier. [snip] Purhaps adding a list signature: Always post followups back to the list! will help, but who reads

Re: why you should reply to the list

2003-08-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Larry Leszczynski wrote: On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: Please advise on another way to tell people to respond to the list and not in private. I used to receive much less off-list replies earlier. [snip] Purhaps adding a list signature: Always post followups back to the list! will

Re: why you should reply to the list

2003-08-27 Thread Douglas Theobald
On 8/26/03 8:48 PM, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Larry Leszczynski wrote: On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: Please advise on another way to tell people to respond to the list and not in private. I used to receive much less off-list replies earlier. [snip] Purhaps

Re: why you should reply to the list

2003-08-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Douglas Theobald wrote: I thought this was a strange behavior for the list messages when I realized that I had replied, accidentally, to Stas personally and not the list. I subscribe to six lists, and mod_perl is the *only* one where my email reader automatically replies to the sender and not the

Re: why you should reply to the list

2003-08-27 Thread Douglas Theobald
On 8/26/03 10:00 PM, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Douglas Theobald wrote: I thought this was a strange behavior for the list messages when I realized that I had replied, accidentally, to Stas personally and not the list. I subscribe to six lists, and mod_perl is the *only* one

Re: why you should reply to the list

2003-08-27 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
Douglas == Douglas Theobald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Douglas All the other lists automatically put the list email address Douglas in the Reply-to: of the distributed posts, thus making Douglas replying to the list the default. Couldn't that be changed Douglas for modperl? Eeek. Please make

Re: why you should reply to the list

2003-08-27 Thread Bruce Tennant
Ok compare: == w/Reply-To "munged" 1) Left click on from line, copy 2) hit reply, replace list email w/sender email 3) type away == w/out reply to, reply to whole list 1) hit reply, DOH! reply all 2) cut out senders email address or he gets duplicate mails (YES I DONT WANT TO READ IT TWICE!) 3)