On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Tracy E Schreiber wrote:
Hi,
I believe that mod_perl 2.0.3 is not compatible with Apache 2.2.6. Starting
Apache gives this error:
httpd.exe: Syntax error on line 31 of D:/Apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load
D:/Apache/modules/mod_perl.so into server: The specified module cou
Hello,
Does apache2.2+mp2 have much advantage than apache2.0+mp2?
2007/10/4, Foo JH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You may want to hold back on 2.2.6. Use either 2.2.4 from ASF or 2.2.5
> from ApacheLounge.
>
> Tracy E Schreiber wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I believe that mod_perl 2.0.3 is not compatible with A
Catalyst uses very many CPAN modules, and I am sure that not all of them are
pure perl.
I've compiled Catalyst using VS6, so if ActivePerl is compiled with the same
compiler, and Apache and mod_perl the same, I don't think it should be a
problem.
I have also tried using an older ppm binary o
You may want to hold back on 2.2.6. Use either 2.2.4 from ASF or 2.2.5
from ApacheLounge.
Tracy E Schreiber wrote:
Hi,
I believe that mod_perl 2.0.3 is not compatible with Apache 2.2.6. Starting
Apache gives this error:
httpd.exe: Syntax error on line 31 of D:/Apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot
Sorry man, I'm not too familiar with Catalyst, so I can't pinpoint the
problem. But if your tests are good with a clean install of Apache2 +
mp2, you may want to check compiler used to build Catalyst (see Randy's
email on the VC used for ActivePerl, Apache, and modperl). I suppose
Catalyst is n
I haven't looked into this, but the fact that AL's
mod_perl (compiled, presumably, with VC8) doesn't
work with, again presumably, ActivePerl (compiled
with VC6) may be another example of the dangers
of mixing components compiled with VC6 and VC8.
Point taken.
Because you used theoryx5's perl/modperl/libapreq2 built for VC8, along with
the AL build of 2.2.4 ALSO built for VC8, everything is dandy.
Equally if you used ActiveState perl (built VC6) + a VC6 build of modperl and
libapreq2 with the ASF distribution of httpd 2.2.4, everything is dandy.
I
Hi,
I believe that mod_perl 2.0.3 is not compatible with Apache 2.2.6. Starting
Apache gives this error:
httpd.exe: Syntax error on line 31 of D:/Apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load
D:/Apache/modules/mod_perl.so into server: The specified module could not be
found.
This worked fine under 2.2.4
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> Well, I've uninstalled VS6 and VS.net, but this message still appears,
> so I have no where to go in Tools/Options/...
You didn't bother to finish reading;
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html
Which tells you how to enable/override drwtsn32 as your default e
Is this any help?
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/api/Apache2/RequestIO.html#C_rflush_
I'm not sure off hand if $r->print() and print behave differently with
regards to flushing. There's a thread in the archive talking about this
stuff. (http://marc.info/?t=11255795481&r=1&w=2) but it doesn'
Ok, but the strange thing is that the error appears even though I've
uninstalled both VS6 and VS.net 2005.
A few days ago I had VS6 and VS.net installed, and that error provided some
debug information (that I couldn't understand). So I went in VS.net and I
set it to not show the debug info bec
Hi,
I've been looking around all over for an answer, no luck yet.
Maybe people from this list can help me.
I upgraded my server from an old distro(apache 1.3+mod_perl 1.x) to a
centos5(apache 2.2 + mod_perl 2.x). It seems that $|=1; is not doing
what it should do.
The code :
#!/usr/
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> And I tried starting the server, but it appeared an error window "Visual
> Studio just in time debugger" and it also printed the following errors
> in the command prompt:
That's a crash. Studio will give you all the info but it's harder to
navigate, for some informati
If I have my own success story how would I go about adding it to the
list?
-bop
On Oct 1, 2007, at 8:39 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On 10/1/07, Carl Johnstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it me, or does that just link through to here:
http://www.oreillynet.com/digitalmedia/blog/2002/05/
pe
Here it is what it happened:
I've installed:
Apache/2.2.4 (Win32), Server built: Jan 9 2007 23:17:20
perl, v5.8.8 built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread built 822
latest mod_perl from TheoryX
After installing them, I started the web server and it worked fine and I
could access the success page.
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Foo JH wrote:
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache
under
windows and I think this thread might help me.
I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from
apacheloun
Hey,
I've written a basic authentication,authorization handler based on ldap
groups. Now the problem is that I need the found ldap groups in my PHP
applications. I've try'd adding the groups to the header but it failed. Here
is what goes wrong.
I Created the following .htaccess
AuthName "Besite
Foo JH wrote:
> Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>> Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache
>> under
>> windows and I think this thread might help me.
>>
>> I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from
>> apachelounge, but they still don't work.
> I
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache
under
windows and I think this thread might help me.
I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from
apachelounge, but they still don't work.
I'm using 2.2.4 now on Win32, and
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from
> apachelounge, but they still don't work.
Simply put; Apache 2.2.4 did work.
The one-off build at AL of 2.2.6 isn't 2.2.6; 2.2.5 represents an aborted
attempted at a release, none of the above r
Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache under
windows and I think this thread might help me.
I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from
apachelounge, but they still don't work.
I read that Apache 2.2.6 from apachelounge should work wit
Foo JH wrote:
>
>> Right. Except there is no 2.2.5;
> 2.2.5 is not released on the Apache web site. Those who want this
> version can get it at ApacheLounge.
They can get it from SVN too, that doesn't mean it's an ASF version.
The ASF specifically rejected it, which makes it's persistence a pr
Right. Except there is no 2.2.5;
2.2.5 is not released on the Apache web site. Those who want this
version can get it at ApacheLounge.
Of course 2.2.4 essentially worked, while 2.2.7 will give the modperl'ers
on Windows something they have BEGGED for forever, the chance to see parsing
error
23 matches
Mail list logo
