Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Igor Chudov
This mathml and asciimath is extremely interesting! Thank you! You are awesome! I was a little unclear what browsers it works with, I would have to do some testing. I hope that it is compatible with all modern browsers and cell phones and such. If not it would not work, but if it is then I would

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Michael Bochkaryov
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Ruben Safir wrote: > > GD::Graph is something that is not going to kill me (like if CGI.pm > became > > unavailable) but it is certainly a concern. > > > > Are there any alternatives to it? > > > imagemajic maybe > It also make sense to try

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Ruben Safir
On 09/11/2016 07:43 PM, Igor Chudov wrote: > you are right. > > It does not even compile correctly any more due to some stupid and > incorrect logic in Makefile.PL related to major and minor perl versions. I > have to edit Makefile.PL prior to compiling it. > > It has no real future, sadly. > >

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Ruben Safir
On 09/11/2016 05:36 PM, Igor Chudov wrote: > Examples of graphics are here: > > https://www.algebra.com/services/rendering/ > > I draw these pictures on the fly using GD::Graph, by parsing formulas and > rendering them in proper notation. GD Graph might be a longer term problem than CGI.pm

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Igor Chudov
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Ruben Safir wrote: > On 09/11/2016 11:38 AM, Igor Chudov wrote: > > About maybe half of those responses are images generated by > mod_perl/CGI.pm > > scripts that draw pictures of math formulas like x/(x+1) etc. > > > > I agree that running

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Dr James Smith
CGI.pm is still good - but i you are using modperl "properly" then it is worth look at APR, which when you use CGI.pm under mod_perl it is what is used under the hood... and is faster than CGI (one less level of abstraction) although there is a minor bug in it - in that is broken if you use

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Ruben Safir
On 09/11/2016 11:38 AM, Igor Chudov wrote: > About maybe half of those responses are images generated by mod_perl/CGI.pm > scripts that draw pictures of math formulas like x/(x+1) etc. > > I agree that running CGI.pm inside true CGI scripts (one process per every > web object) is expensive.

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Igor Chudov
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Ruben Safir wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:46:52AM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote: > > Ruben, thank you for your opinion. You have your own opinion and I have > > mine, and that is what makes the Internet beautiful. > > > > Take a look at your

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Ruben Safir
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:46:52AM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote: > Ruben, thank you for your opinion. You have your own opinion and I have > mine, and that is what makes the Internet beautiful. > > Take a look at your own website coinhangout.com. It is down right now. But > take a look at its google

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Clive Eisen
I ca only speak for Dancer2 - I imagine they are all similar > On 11 Sep 2016, at 15:55, Igor Chudov wrote: > > Eugene, sorry for my ignorant questions. > > I see several of these frameworks. > > Is that correct that the result of setting up and programming the framework >

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Igor Chudov
Eugene, sorry for my ignorant questions. I see several of these frameworks. Is that correct that the result of setting up and programming the framework is a running perl script? It needs a reverse proxy in front of it? (I use nginx as a reverse proxy). Does nginx proxy to those? Do you need

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Ruben Safir
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:46:52AM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote: > Ruben, thank you for your opinion. You have your own opinion and I have > mine, and that is what makes the Internet beautiful. > > Take a look at your own website coinhangout.com. It is down right now. But > take a look at its google

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Igor Chudov
Ruben, thank you for your opinion. You have your own opinion and I have mine, and that is what makes the Internet beautiful. Take a look at your own website coinhangout.com. It is down right now. But take a look at its google cache:

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread jniederberger
-Original Message- From: Ruben Safir Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 11:58 PM Just for the record, this is not correct and I think time has proven that integrating language into the html output has resulted in a Marjory of active server pages. [snip] I just have a distaste

Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module

2016-09-11 Thread Ruben Safir
On 09/11/2016 02:35 AM, Eric Aarts wrote: > Only non-issue – and only on stopping/restarting service apache2 – are > lines like these in the apache2 error.log: > > [Sun Sep 11 08:31:00.430150 2016] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 15239] AH00169: > caught SIGTERM, shutting down > > [ error] oh jeez,