Randy,
I think characterizing the ASF binaries as unreliable with
mod_perl is misleading - there were some recent problems
with restarts, etc. on Win32 that have been looked into
and addressed for the 2.2.8 release.
The intent of my earlier response was not to undermine the quality of
the ASF b
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Foo JH wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Foo JH wrote:
Andre,
I've recently set up a test based very closely on your platform:
AP2.2.8
AP5.8.8 Build 822
MP2.0.3
You mention a VC 2005 build of httpd, which build of MP? 2005?
Not sure which uwinnipeg is built against,
Hi guys,
thank you very much for all the interest in the issue, but
could one of you summarise and tell me what I should do ? Should I
- go back to ActivePerl 8.8.820 (instead of 8.8.22 currently) ?
- do something else (like what Jan Dubois said below ? (or is that just
for the people creating t
Jan Dubois wrote:
http://downloads.activestate.com/ActivePerl/Windows/5.8/ActivePerl-5.8.8.822-MSWin32-x86-280952-symbols.zip
The symbols.zip file should be unpacked in the C:\Perl directory, or
wherever you installed ActivePerl as it contains .pdb file for both the
bin and the lib subtree.
I know. ApacheLounge uses a different (newer) compiler, and the
implications can be quite risky. I've started on this path since the
earlier 2.2.x when modperl on the ASF binaries has been unreliable, and
support on the mailing list confirmed my experience more than resolved it.
Why don't you
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
> We might see what compiling the ppm with .pdb files (not sure if you
> do that already) - simply /Zi args to CL.exe and /debug /opt:ref to
> the linker (rather than /release). Of course you can unpack the httpd
> symbols from
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've also seen crashes of Apache/2.2.8 with mod_perl
when Apache is started as a service, whereas it's fine
if started from the command line. I'll try the
suggestion in
http://marc.info/?l=apache-modperl&m=120234507226177&w=2
to see if it's the version of ActivePerl that's
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Foo JH wrote:
Andre,
I've recently set up a test based very closely on your platform:
AP2.2.8
AP5.8.8 Build 822
MP2.0.3
You mention a VC 2005 build of httpd, which build of MP? 2005?
Not sure which uwinnipeg is built against, msvcrt or msvcr8
Foo JH wrote:
Andre,
I've recently set up a test based very closely on your platform:
AP2.2.8
AP5.8.8 Build 822
MP2.0.3
You mention a VC 2005 build of httpd, which build of MP? 2005?
Not sure which uwinnipeg is built against, msvcrt or msvcr80.
But my recent observation is that if you use A
Andre,
I've recently set up a test based very closely on your platform:
AP2.2.8
AP5.8.8 Build 822
MP2.0.3
The only diff is I got the AP2.2.8 binaries from ApacheLounge. It seems
to be quite stable so far, including service startups, Apache restarts etc.
André Warnier wrote:
Hi.
I just re-in
André Warnier wrote:
I installed Apache 2.2.8, Activeperl 5.8.8.822 and mod_perl 2.0.3 from
uwinnipeg.
Rumor has it the prior Perl 5.8.8 from ActiveState was golden, and this 822
build introduces issues. Would you give a quick try to their immediately
previous 5.8.8. release and let us know?
Hi.
I just re-installed a Windows XP Pro SP2 station from scratch after a
virus infection.
I installed Apache 2.2.8, Activeperl 5.8.8.822 and mod_perl 2.0.3 from
uwinnipeg.
I cannot start Apache as a Service, crashes with the following message
in Windows log (it's in German, but you get the dr
12 matches
Mail list logo
