Getting started with mod_perl

2004-04-08 Thread Ian harisay
Hi, I am just getting started with mod_perl. Can someone tell me what versions of Apache and mod_perl I should run together? I am setting up a 1U server and a laptop. I have been debating RH9 or Fedora. Any opinions there? Thanks for your input. -Ian -- Report problems: http

Re: Getting started with mod_perl

2004-04-08 Thread Ken Burcham
wget http://apache.mirrors.pair.com/httpd/httpd-2.0.48.tar.gz and while you're at it, grab the Apache::Request stuff: wget http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/J/JO/JOESUF/libapreq2-2.02_02- dev.tar.gz ken. On 8 Apr 2004 at 10:44, Ian harisay wrote: > Hi, > > I am just getting started with mod

Re: Getting started with mod_perl

2004-04-08 Thread Stas Bekman
Ken Burcham wrote: Hi, ModPerl2 and Apache2 are the latest and greatest (You can't run Apache1 with ModPerl2 or Apache2 with ModPerl1). Note also mod_perl_1.99 is (going to be) mod_perl2. Here's what I do: wget http://perl.apache.org/dist/mod_perl-2.0-current.tar.gz and wget http://apache.m

Re: Getting started with mod_perl

2004-04-08 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Stas" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stas> While mod_perl2 is almost there it is still in beta and some of the Stas> API is still changing. So if you want to stick with a stable API use Stas> mod_perl1 for now. Yeah, I was wondering about that. In particular, I've been drafted

Re: Getting started with mod_perl

2004-04-08 Thread Frank Wiles
On 08 Apr 2004 11:35:50 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote: > > "Stas" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Stas> While mod_perl2 is almost there it is still in beta and some of > the Stas> API is still changing. So if you want to stick with a stable > API use Stas>

Re: Getting started with mod_perl

2004-04-08 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Frank" == Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Frank> Considering most (if not all) of the talks last year at OSCON were Frank> about 2.0 or switching to 2.0, a mostly 1.0 talk might be welcomed Frank> by people who are new to mod_perl or not looking to switch in the Frank> near

Re: Getting started with mod_perl

2004-04-08 Thread Frank Wiles
On 08 Apr 2004 11:53:09 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote: > > "Frank" == Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Frank> Considering most (if not all) of the talks last year at OSCON > were Frank> about 2.0 or switching to 2.0, a mostly 1.0 talk might > be welcomed Fr

Re: Getting started with mod_perl

2004-04-08 Thread Stas Bekman
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Stas" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stas> While mod_perl2 is almost there it is still in beta and some of the Stas> API is still changing. So if you want to stick with a stable API use Stas> mod_perl1 for now. Yeah, I was wondering about that. Hopefully by

Re: Getting started with mod_perl

2004-04-08 Thread Stas Bekman
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: So, I'll have to change my spin a bit... can someone give me the latest pointers to "here's mp2 for you mp1 experts" notes or slides? http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/ __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH --

Re: Getting started with mod_perl

2004-04-08 Thread Gedanken
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: My mod_perl 2 tutorial is on Monday July 26, 1:45pm to 5:15pm. Feel free to stop by and learn so you can do more than just mention it. forgive my ignornace, but where? -- gedanken -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: htt

Re: Getting started with mod_perl

2004-04-08 Thread Stas Bekman
Gedanken wrote: On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: My mod_perl 2 tutorial is on Monday July 26, 1:45pm to 5:15pm. Feel free to stop by and learn so you can do more than just mention it. forgive my ignornace, but where? Randal was talking about OSCON. http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os20

[QUESTION] Newbie getting started with mod_perl on a production server = trouble?

2004-02-18 Thread cyberintense
Hello all, I'm new to the list, and I apologize if these questions seem too elementary, but I did not seem to be able to find definitive answers elsewhere. I would like to start using mod_perl12, and I'm confident that I can figure out how to get it up and running (with plenty of written instruct

Re: [QUESTION] Newbie getting started with mod_perl on a production server = trouble?

2004-02-18 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:36:36PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would like to start using mod_perl12, and I'm confident that I can is this mod_perl1 or mod_perl2 (for Apache 1.x or 2.x) Anyway, take a look at this section of the docs: http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/install.htm

Re: [QUESTION] Newbie getting started with mod_perl on a production server = trouble?

2004-02-18 Thread Geoffrey Young
in additon to the suggestions made by thomas... > 2) Would the mod_perl installation affect more than just the one > directory designated to run mod_perl scripts? IOW, would my other > scripts, now running in the cgi-bin, be affected in any way? I figured > on using an extension specific to mod_pe

Re: [QUESTION] Newbie getting started with mod_perl on a production server = trouble?

2004-02-18 Thread cyberintense
"Geoffrey Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > you should really start with one of the books dedicated to mod_perl, as it > is there that you will find explanations from the people most familiar with > the technology. Yes, the more I got into researching specifics today, finding lots of seemingly c

RE: [QUESTION] Newbie getting started with mod_perl on a production server = trouble?

2004-02-18 Thread sagi
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Newbie getting started with mod_perl on a production server = trouble? "Geoffrey Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > you should really start with one of the books dedicated to mod_perl, as it > is there that you will find explanatio

Re: [QUESTION] Newbie getting started with mod_perl on a production server = trouble?

2004-02-18 Thread Geoffrey Young
> Yes, the more I got into researching specifics today, finding lots of > seemingly conflicting advice, the more I can see the need for in-depth > help. if you stick to perl.apache.org and the resources listed there you are unlikely to suggestions that are too far apart. > I'll definitely be ge