Thanks everyone for their inputs. I still think we can learn a few things from
.Net design - not everything Microsoft produces is junk :)
That said, has anyone on this list ever tried PerlNet
(http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/docs/PerlDevKit) from ActiveState? Good/Bad ?
Fine Prints?
-
On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Foo JH wrote:
Boysenberry Payne wrote:
One of the draw back that seems to be evident to me as I've looked
into the client side frameworks is changes in the code are ought
of your control. WIth a purely server side solution it would seem
to give the coder the
On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:47 PM, Boysenberry Payne wrote:
Currently, without something like cpan for JS and with most of our
administration
tasks being handled via Actionscript in the client browser I'm
probably going
to take my time and continue writing most of my JS; most of it is
pretty
Boysenberry Payne wrote:
It was Yahoo's yui-ext library aka extjs that I was told this could
really be a problem
with. So I guess all JS frameworks aren't created equal.
It actually shouldn't be a problem as long as you don't use their hosted version
of files and use local copies instead.
ASP.Net tries to do both the server and client side (sometimes the programmer
doesn't even know if his C# code is actually going to be run on the server or
the client). Perl (and on this list mod_perl) takes care of the server side but
leaves the client side up to you.
I believe that's the
One of the draw back that seems to be evident to me as I've looked
into the client side frameworks is changes in the code are ought
of your control. WIth a purely server side solution it would seem
to give the coder the choice to upgrade when there is time, etc.
With the 3rd party frameworks
Boysenberry Payne wrote:
One of the draw back that seems to be evident to me as I've looked
into the client side frameworks is changes in the code are ought
of your control. WIth a purely server side solution it would seem
to give the coder the choice to upgrade when there is time, etc.
With
Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Modperl Mailing List modperl@perl.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 12:52:36 PM
Subject: Re: Perl and ASP.Net
Boysenberry Payne wrote:
One of the draw back that seems to be evident to me as I've looked
into the client side frameworks is changes in the code
Clinton Gormley wrote:
code, it's own CSS , it's own images! There should be a well
established usage pattern so someone just downloads the grid module,
run the installer and it puts all the files in 'right' places.
Of course, it's not possible currently since everyone has a different
From: Praveen Ray
The bigger issue is not of client or server side controls. What's sorely
missing is a recommended best practice pattern that mod-perl people should
follow to package and deliver chunks of functionality.
There is more than one way to do it is an advantage, not a
On Apr 25, 2007, at 11:52 AM, Michael Peters wrote:
Boysenberry Payne wrote:
One of the draw back that seems to be evident to me as I've looked
into the client side frameworks is changes in the code are ought
of your control. WIth a purely server side solution it would seem
to give the coder
Praveen Ray wrote:
My biggest gripe about these web frameworks is the lack of
reusable UI controls aka ASP.Net. One reason ASP.Net has caught on so
quickly is the availability of inexpensive and slick third party UI
controls.
ASP.Net tries to do both the server and client side (sometimes
If you want a lamp framework with reusable UI controls, maybe you should
look at http://www.activegrid.com/ . I don't believe it supports modperl
though. As far as I know, there isn't an easy high-level web design
framework that lets designers achieve some of the better features you see
Most geeks make lousy web designers and would rather fiddle
with the back end server code than CSS and javascript.
I agree that I'm a lousy designer, but in this day Javascript (and CSS to some
extent) are becoming more and more important. Javascript is a real programming
language relegating
Praveen Ray wrote:
Most geeks make lousy web designers and would rather fiddle
with the back end server code than CSS and javascript.
I agree that I'm a lousy designer, but in this day Javascript (and CSS
to some
extent) are becoming more and more important. Javascript is a real
programming
Hello people
Trying to look for the *best* perl web framework out there and looking for
suggestions. I've looked at Catalyst, Jifty and bunch of other frameworks. My
biggest gripe about these web frameworks is the lack of reusable UI controls
aka ASP.Net. One reason ASP.Net has caught on so
On 4/23/07, Praveen Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t
Hello people
Trying to look for the *best* perl web framework out there and looking for
suggestions. I've looked at Catalyst, Jifty and bunch of other frameworks.
My biggest gripe about these web frameworks is the lack of reusable UI
controls
17 matches
Mail list logo
