Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-22 Thread Stas Bekman
Nathan Torkington wrote: >>cvs where? it has to stay at perl.apache.org I believe. >> > > Didn't you say that the current site is maintained with CVS? Just > make a subdirectory /new and put the new site into that. Work from > there. ok >>Also what components framework have you used, is i

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-22 Thread Nathan Torkington
Stas Bekman writes: > Though I prefer mild colours, not shouting ones. I use the site all the > time, and I don't need to be shouted at. May be we want a splash page > just for some entrance page, which those who use the site daily don't > have to see. I like the colours at use.perl.org and eve

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Nathan Torkington wrote: > Ken Williams writes: > >>Not that I dislike them - the current colors let me look at the page >>for a few seconds, then shut off the monitor and read the text while >>staring at a blank white sheet of paper. >> man, that was so strong, I thought I've hit some wrong l

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-18 Thread Nathan Torkington
Ken Williams writes: > Not that I dislike them - the current colors let me look at the page > for a few seconds, then shut off the monitor and read the text while > staring at a blank white sheet of paper. I'm impressed that you suffered such intense retinal distress and never made the logical de

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-18 Thread Ken Williams
Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are some web design To Do items: > * ensure colors are part of the standard palette (right now they're >just easy to type in hex :-) Holy shit Nat, those colors are strong. =) You've really taken attention-getting into the twenty-first

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-18 Thread Nathan Torkington
Ask Bjoern Hansen writes: > > I'll chew on a new layout and give you something by the end of the > > week. Thanks, > > awesome! :-) I did have something by the end of last week, just not much. I'd hoped to find the time to plug the holes this week, but haven't been able to. So here it is, woe

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-15 Thread Ken Williams
Before I forget to say anything: Ask, haven't you set up a basic Mason framework for the *.perl.org sites that an apache.perl.org could just piggyback onto? Stas, I think that was why Nat suggested Mason - not that using Mason would necessarily make anything better itself, but that we could g

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Ken Williams wrote: > Before I forget to say anything: > > Ask, haven't you set up a basic Mason framework for the *.perl.org sites > that an apache.perl.org could just piggyback onto? Stas, I think that > was why Nat suggested Mason - not that using Mason would necessarily > make anything b

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-11 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Nathan Torkington wrote: > Stas Bekman writes: > > Everything is under CVS, and if somebody wants to come and give a > > hand to redo the site, there is no problem to give a cvs access to > > this person. > > I'll chew on a new layout and give you something by the end of the

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-11 Thread Nathan Torkington
Stas Bekman writes: > Everything is under CVS, and if somebody wants to come and give a > hand to redo the site, there is no problem to give a cvs access to > this person. I'll chew on a new layout and give you something by the end of the week. Thanks, Nat

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-11 Thread brian moseley
On Sun, 7 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > We have had two new designs worked out long time ago, > but one has been picked by take23.org and the other > wasn't applied. (hi brian) :( sorry! i have this tendency to bite off more than i can chew. i have 10 projects and none of them will ever be fin

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-11 Thread brian moseley
On Sun, 7 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > can you please post the URL again? thanks! http://thisishomemade.com/for/modperl/site/ like he said before, it's really just a reorganization of the available information, rather than a complete site architecture with fancy rollover navigation, huge menu

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-06 Thread Stas Bekman
brian moseley wrote: > On Sun, 7 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>We have had two new designs worked out long time ago, >>but one has been picked by take23.org and the other >>wasn't applied. (hi brian) >> > > :( > > sorry! i have this tendency to bite off more than i can > chew. i have 10

Re: perl.apache.org / apache.perl.org

2001-10-06 Thread Stas Bekman
[CC'ing modperl-site where this discussion really belongs to] Nathan Torkington wrote: > This site is hosted on an apache.org box. Any chance we could host it > at perl.org and built a pretty-looking Mason site for the content > that's already there? Then we could open it up with CVS for other